This study tested competing predictions about the impact of nepotistic hiring on perceptions of nepotism beneficiaries, focusing specifically on the performance attributions made about nepotism hires. Of particular interest is how the qualifications of the family member compared to other applicants impacts perceptions of the nepotism hire.
Two experimental studies, using scenarios that simulated the hiring process, were conducted. Participants reviewed materials describing the hiring process for a manager and then completed a questionnaire assessing their perceptions of the person hired.
Results showed that successful performance of nepotism beneficiaries was attributed more to political skills and relationships with upper management and less to ability and effort than was the case for non-beneficiaries and that they were perceived as less competent and as having fewer characteristics of successful managers. These negative perceptions occurred regardless of the family member’s qualifications.
This study contributes to our understanding of nepotistic hiring practices. More negative performance attributions and perceptions of competence for nepotism beneficiaries may hinder their effectiveness on the job. Knowledge gained from this study may help businesses who want to hire family members of current employees to manage this process more effectively.
This is one of the first studies to examine the consequences of nepotistic hiring for nepotism beneficiaries and the first study to examine how nepotistic hiring effects the performance attributions made about nepotism beneficiaries. It is also the only study to empirically examine how the qualifications of the nepotism beneficiary influence others’ reactions to them.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
For this interaction, Roy’s greatest characteristic root (g.c.r.) was statistically significant (Roy’s = .10, F(7,174) = 2.37, p = .025) and indicated that at least the first multivariate function differed across levels and as such warranted further exploration (see Harris 2001).
Abdalla, H. F., Maghrabi, A. S., & Raggad, B. G. (1998). Assessing perceptions of human resource managers toward nepotism: A cross-cultural study. International Journal of Manpower, 19, 554–570.
Ammons, J. L., & Brooks, C. M. (2011). An empirical study of gender issues in assessments using peer and self evaluations. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 15, 49–62.
Arasli, H., Bavik, A., & Ekiz, E. H. (2006). The effects of nepotism on human resource management: The case of three, four and five star hotels in northern Cyprus. International Journal of Sociology and Social policy, 26(7), 295–308.
Arasli, H., & Tumer, M. (2008). Nepotism, favoritism and cronyism: A study of their effects on job stress and job satisfaction in the banking industry of north Cyprus. Social Behavior and Personality, 36(9), 1237–1250.
Bellow, A. (2003a). In praise of nepotism: A natural history. New York: Doubleday.
Bellow, A. (2003b). In praise of nepotism. The Atlantic. Retrieved September 15, 2012, from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2003/07/in-praise-of-nepotism/302753.
Brenner, O. C., Tomkiewicz, J., & Schein, V. E. (1989). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics revisited. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 662–669.
Ciulla, J. (2005). In praise of nepotism? Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(1), 153–160.
Corrigan, P., Markowitz, F. E., Watson, A., Rowan, D., & Kubiak, M. (2003). An attribution model of public discrimination toward persons with mental illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44, 162–179.
Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social Stigma. In D. T. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 504–553). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Dailey, R. C., & Reuschling, T. L. (1980). Human resource management in the family-owned company. Journal of General Management, 5(3), 49–56.
Deaux, K. (1976). Sex: A perspective on the atttribution process. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution theory research (Vol. 1, pp. 335–352). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Deaux, K. (2004). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade’s research on gender. American Psychologist, 39(2), 105–116.
Denison, D., Lief, C., & Ward, J. (2004). Culture in family-owned enterprises: Recognizing and leveraging unique strengths. Family Business Review, 17(1), 61–70.
Dickson, M. W., Nieminen, L. R., & Biermeier-Hanson, B. (2012). Nepotism and organizational homogeneity: How the attraction-selection-attrition (ASA) is accelerated by nonmerit-based decision-making. In R. G. Jones (Ed.), Nepotism in organizations (pp. 93–128). New York: Routledge.
Ewing, D. W. (1965). Is nepotism so bad? Harvard Business Review, 43(1), 22–30, 39–40, 156–159.
Ford, R., & McLaughlin, F. (1986). Nepotism: Boon or bane. Personnel Administrator, 31, 79–89.
Furnham, A. (2005). Gender and personality differences in self- and other ratings of business intelligence. British Journal of Management, 16(2), 91–103.
Grice, J. W., & Iwasaki, M. (2007). A truly multivariate approach to MANOVA. Applied Multivariate Research, 12, 199–226.
Gutman, A. (2012). Nepotism and employment law. In R. G. Jones (Ed.), Nepotism in organizations (pp. 93–128). New York: Routledge.
Hamori-Ota, V. E. (2007). Gender differences in leadership style: Predictors of level of agreement between leader self-ratings and supervisory ratings, peer ratings, and ratings by direct reports. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A, 68.
Harris, R. J. (2001). A primer of multivariate statistics. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group.
Hayajenh, A. F., Maghrabi, A. S., & Al-Dabbagh, T. H. (1994). Assessing the effect of nepotism on human resource managers. International Journal of Manpower, 16, 60–67.
Heilman, M. E., Battle, W. S., Keller, C. E., & Lee, A. R. (1998). Type of affirmative action policy: A determinant of reactions to sex-based preferential selection? Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 190–205.
Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., & Lucas, J. A. (1992). Presumed incompetent? Stigmatization and affirmative action efforts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 536–544.
Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., & Stathatos, P. (1997). The affirmative action stigma of incompetence: Effects of performance information ambiguity. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 603–625.
Heilman, M. E., McCullough, W. F., & Gilbert, D. (1996). The other side of affirmative action: Reactions of non-beneficiaries to sex-based preferential selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 346–357.
Heilman, M. E., & Welle, B. (2006). Disadvantaged by diversity? The effects of diversity goals on competence perceptions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(5), 1291–1319.
Jones, R. G. (2012). Nepotism in organizations. New York: Routledge.
Keles, H. N., Ozkan, T. K., & Bezirci, M. (2011). A study on the effects of nepotism, favoritism and cronyism on organizational trust in the auditing process in family businesses in Turkey. International Business and Economics Research Journal, 10(9), 9–16.
Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457–501.
Lenz, B. F., & Laband, D. N. (1989). Why so many children of doctors become doctors: Nepotism vs. human capital transfers. The Journal of Human Resources, 24(3), 396–413.
Lin, T., Dobbins, G. H., & Farh, J. (1992). A field study of race and age similarity effects on interview ratings in conventional and situational interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(3), 363–371.
Maestripieri, D. (2012, May–June). Strangers need not apply. Psychology Today, 45, 48–50.
Martin, J. K., Pescosolido, B. A., & Tuch, S. A. (2000). Of fear and loathing: The role of disturbing behavior, labels and causal attributions in shaping public attitudes toward people with mental illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 4(2), 208–223.
Martinko, M. J., Douglas, S. C., & Harvey, P. (2006). Attribution theory in industrial–organizational psychology: A review. In G. P. Hodgkinson & J. K. Ford (Eds.), International review of industrial–organizational psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 127–187). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Massengill, D. (1997). Not with your husband (or wife) you don’t! The legality of no spouse rules in the workplace. Public Personnel Management, 26(1), 61.
Mhatre, K. H., Riggio, R. E., & Riggio, H. R. (2012). Nepotism and leadership. In R. G. Jones (Ed.), Nepotism in organizations (pp. 171–198). New York: Routledge.
Mulder, B. (2010). Risking the business or reaping the benefits: The antecedents or consequences of nepotism. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 70(12-B), 7889.
Mulder, B. (2012). A model of organizational nepotism. In R. G. Jones (Ed.), Nepotism in organizations (pp. 219–251). New York: Routledge.
Padgett, M. Y., & Morris, K. A. (2000). The impact of sex-based preferential selection on subordinate perceptions of a new supervisor. Paper presented at the 2000 Administrative Sciences Association of Canada conference in Montreal, QC.
Padgett, M. Y., & Morris, K. A. (2005). Keeping it “all in the family”: Does nepotism in the hiring process really benefit the beneficiary? Journal of Leadership and Organization Studies, 11(2), 34–45.
Padgett, M. Y., & Morris, K. A. (2012). Reactions to nepotism in the hiring process: The role of family member qualifications. Unpublished manuscript, Indianapolis, IN: Butler University.
Peters, L. H., & Terborg, J. R. (1975). The effects of temporal placement of unfavorable information and of attitude similarity in personnel selection decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(2), 279–293.
Pfeffer, J. (2005). Working alone: What ever happened to the idea of organizations as communities? Stanford Graduate School of Business Research Paper Series No. 1906. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved October 2, 2012, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=804544.
Podgers, J. (1996). Marriage traps in the workplace. ABA Journal, 82(1), 46.
Rand, T. M., & Wexley, K. N. (1975). Demonstration of the effect, “similar-to-me”, in simulated employment interviews. Psychological Reports, 36(2), 535–544.
Reisenzein, R. (1986). A structural equation analysis of Weiner’s attribution-affect model of helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1123–1133.
Schein, V. E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(2), 95–100.
Schein, V. E. (1975). Relationships between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(3), 340–344.
Schein, V. E., Mueller, R., & Jacobson, C. (1989). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among college students. Sex Roles, 20(1), 103–110.
Scoppa, V. (2009). Intergenerational transfers of public service jobs: A shred of evidence on nepotism. Public Choice, 141, 167–188.
Sears, D. O., & Funk, C. L. (1995). The role of self-interest in social and political attitudes. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 1–91). New York: Academic Press.
Sears, G. J., & Rowe, P. M. (2003). A personality-based similar-to-me effect in the employment interview: Conscientiousness and affect- versus competence-mediated interpretations and the role of job relevance. Canadian Journal of the Behavioral Sciences, 35(1), 13–24.
Slack, C. (2001, September). Breeding success. MBA Jungle, September, 82–88.
Vallejo, M. (2008). Is the culture of family firms really different? A value-based model for its survival through generations. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 261–279.
Weiner, B., Perry, R. P., & Magnusson, J. (1988). An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(5), 738–748.
Welle, B. (2004). The price of privilege: The derogation of the work and personal characteristics of favored employees. Unpublished dissertation, New York University.
Werbal, J. D., & Hames, D. S. (1996). Anti-nepotism reconsidered. Group and Organization Management, 21(3), 365–379.
Young, B. S. (1995). Family matters. HR Magazine, 40(11), 30.
Zuckerman, M. (1979). Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory. Journal of Personality, 47, 245–287.
About this article
Cite this article
Padgett, M.Y., Padgett, R.J. & Morris, K.A. Perceptions of Nepotism Beneficiaries: The Hidden Price of Using a Family Connection to Obtain a Job. J Bus Psychol 30, 283–298 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9354-9
- Performance attributions
- Preferential selection