Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of Applicant Personality on Resume Evaluations

Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

This study examined the extent that personality information in resumes impacts hiring judgments through applicant’s resumes. Study 1 examined lay theories regarding relationships between resume cues and the applicant’s personality and hireability. Study 2 examined how the applicant’s personality impacted hiring judgments through resumes.

Design/Methodology/Approach

Data for both studies were collected in the context of a managerial position. For Study 1, participants assessed resume cues in regards to their relationship with personality and hireability. For Study 2, Human Resource personnel evaluated each resume in regards to personality and hireability.

Findings

Results for Study 1 highlight several connections between applicants’ personality and resumes, with strong links between resume content and perceptions of conscientiousness and agreeableness. Results for Study 2 indicate that personality was largely unrelated to ratings of hireability but perceptions of personality were strongly linked to hireability; actual personality was linked to the variability in cue information related to hireability, and conscientiousness was indirectly related to hireability through judgments of conscientiousness.

Implications

Results from these studies suggest that personality and perceptions of personality play a greater role in resume development and screening than has been previously suggested. The pattern of results reported suggest that there are a number of resumes cues that accurately reflect an applicant’s personality and influence perceptions of hireability.

Originality/Value

By taking an exploratory approach, the current studies were able to explore a large variety of cues linked to personality and ratings of hireability. Results have implications for both applicants and HR personnel evaluating resumes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that multilevel regression produces unstandardized regression coefficients. Hox (2010) presents a formula (2.13, p. 22) to derive standardized coefficients from the unstandardized coefficients. This is accomplished by multiplying the unstandardized coefficient by the standard deviation of the explanatory variable and dividing the product by the standard deviation of the outcome variable. As these regression results are computed with one explanatory and one outcome variable, the resulting standardized coefficient is analogous to a correlation controlling for the multilevel nature of the data.

References

  • Altheide, D. L. (1987). Reflections: Ethnographic content analysis. Qualitative Sociology, 1, 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, B. (2012, October 6). Why companies use software to scan resumes. NPR.org. Retrieved May 20, 2013, from http://www.npr.org/2012/10/06/162440531/why-companies-use-software-to-scan-resumes.

  • Bright, J. E. H., & Hutton, S. (2000). The impact of competency statements on résumes for short-listing decisions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. K., & Campion, M. A. (1994). Biodata phenomenology: Recruiters’ perceptions and use of biographical information in resume screening. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 897–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. S., Feild, H. S., & Giles, W. F. (2003a). Using recruiter assessments of applicants’ resume content to predict applicant mental ability and big five personality dimensions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 78–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. S., Feild, H. S., & Giles, W. F. (2003b). What can we uncover about applicants based on their resumes? A field study. Applied HRM Research, 8, 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. S., Feild, H. S., Giles, W. F., & Harris, S. G. (2004). Job type and recruiters’ inferences of applicant personality drawn from resume biodata: Their relationships with hiring recommendations. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 363–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. S., Feild, H. S., Giles, W. F., & Harris, S. G. (2009). Recruiters’ inferences of applicant personality based on resume screening: Do paper people have a personality? Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. S., Field, H. S., & Stafford, J. O. (2005). Validity of resume reviewers’ inferences concerning applicant personality based on resume evaluation. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13, 321–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corwen, L. (1988). Your resume: Key to a better job (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H. S., & Holley, W. H. (1976). Resume preparation: An empirical study of personnel managers’ perceptions. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 24, 229–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakel, M. D., Dobmeyer, T. W., & Dunnette, M. D. (1970). Relative importance of three content dimensions in overall suitability ratings of job applicants’ resumes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J. L., Curran, P. G., Keeney, J., Poposki, E. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2012). Detecting and deterring insufficient effort responding to surveys. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, K. L. (1984). Personnel administrators’ preferences for resume content: A survey and review of empirically based conclusions. Journal of Business Communication, 21, 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julian, M. W. (2001). The consequences of ignoring multilevel data structures in nonhierarchical covariance modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 325–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knouse, S. B. (1994). Impressions of the resume: The effects of applicant education, experience, and impression management. Journal of Business and Psychology, 9, 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knouse, S. B., Giacalone, R. A., & Pollard, H. (1988). Impression management in the resume and its cover letter. Journal of Business and Psychology, 3, 242–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, E. L., & Flory, A. (1975). Evaluation of job applications: A conceptual framework. Public Personnel Management, 4, 378–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1, 85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17, 437–455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nemanick, R. C, Jr, & Clark, E. M. (2002). The differential effects of extracurricular activities on attributions in resume evaluation. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 10, 206–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. D., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Selig, J. P. (2012). Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6, 77–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, C. K., & Kristof, A. L. (1995). Making the right impression: A field study of applicant impression management during job interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 587–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, G. L., Dustin, S. L., Barrick, M. R., & Darnold, T. C. (2008). Exploring the handshake in employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1139–1146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thoms, P., McMasters, R., Roberts, M. R., & Dombkowski, D. A. (1999). Resume characteristics as predictors of an invitation to interview. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 339–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. F., & Lewis, A. (1996). Better resumes for executives and professionals (3rd ed.). Hauppauge, NY: Barron’s Educational Series.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Wright State University, 3640 Colonel Glenn Hwy, Dayton, OH, 45435-0001, USA

    Gary N. Burns, Megan B. Morris & David. A. Periard

  2. Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA

    Neil D. Christiansen & John A. Coaster

Authors
  1. Gary N. Burns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Neil D. Christiansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Megan B. Morris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David. A. Periard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. John A. Coaster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary N. Burns.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 4

Table 4 Resume cues and hireability information used in studies 1 and 2
Full size table

Appendix 2: Example Cue Rating Form and Instructions from Study 1

In the following survey, you will answer questions about specific cues found in resumes, and how they are related to an applicant’s personality and hireability. Below is an example of how you will answer each question. Please follow these directions exactly how we present them.

On each page of the survey, you will be presented with one resume cue. Below this cue will be a matrix table (see example below).

The first column of the matrix table includes personality adjectives. First, start with the first row (e.g., extraverted) and work your way across the columns of the matrix table from the left to the right.

The second column asks “Is this resume cue related to the following adjective?” At this time you will answer whether you think the resume cue “Applicant’s name” is related to the adjective “Extraverted.” You will check either “Related” or “Unrelated.”

Then you will move on to the third column which states “If you checked Related, what type of relationship is it?” At this time if you checked that the resume cue “Applicant’s name” was related to the adjective “Extraverted,” you will check whether it is a “Positive” or a “Negative” relationship with the adjective.

Lastly, you will move to the fourth column which states “If you checked Related, how strongly is this resume cue related to this adjective?” At this time, if you checked that the resume cue “Applicant’s name” was related to the adjective “Extraverted,” you will check how strongly it is related to the adjective, either “Slightly” related, “Moderately” related, or “Strongly” related.

Go across each column for each adjective. If you answered “Unrelated” for any of the adjectives then leave the third and fourth columns blank.

Example of question:

Resume cue:

Applicant uses sentence fragments versus complete sentences

 

Is this resume cue related to the follow adjective?

If you checked Related, what type of relationship is it?

If you checked Related, how strongly is this resume cue related to this adjective?

 

Related

Unrelated

Positive

Negative

Slightly

Moderately

Strongly

Extraverted

       

Inactive

       

Assertive

       

Uncooperative

       

Trustful

       

Generous

       

Unorganized

       

Conscientious

       

Hardworking

       

Relaxed

       

Emotional

       

Envious

       

Analytical

       

Creative

       

Unsophisticated

       

How important is this resume cue for making decisions about the applicant’s hireability?

  • Not important.

  • Of little importance.

  • Somewhat important.

  • Very important.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burns, G.N., Christiansen, N.D., Morris, M.B. et al. Effects of Applicant Personality on Resume Evaluations. J Bus Psychol 29, 573–591 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9349-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9349-6

Keywords

search

Navigation