Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 73–88 | Cite as

Examining Applicant Reactions to the Use of Social Networking Websites in Pre-Employment Screening

  • J. William Stoughton
  • Lori Foster Thompson
  • Adam W. Meade
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Social networking websites such as Facebook allow employers to gain information about applicants which job seekers may not otherwise share during the hiring process. This multi-study investigation examined how job seekers react to this screening practice.

Design/Methodology

Study 1 (N = 175) employed a realistic selection scenario examining applicant reactions to prospective employers reviewing their social networking website. Study 2 (N = 208) employed a simulated selection scenario where participants rated their experience with a proposed selection process.

Findings

In Study 1, social networking website screening caused applicants to feel their privacy had been invaded, which ultimately resulted in lower organizational attraction. Applicants low in agreeableness had the most adverse reactions to social networking website screening. In Study 2, screening again caused applicants to feel their privacy had been invaded, resulting in lower organizational attraction and increased intentions to litigate. The organization’s positive/negative hiring decision did not moderate the relationship between screening and justice.

Implications

The results suggest organizations should consider the costs and benefits of social media screening which could reduce the attractiveness of the organization. Additionally, applicants may need to change their conceptualization of social networking websites, viewing them through the eyes of a prospective employer.

Originality/Value

This investigation proposed and tested an explanatory model of the effects of screening practices on organizational outcomes demonstrating how electronic monitoring, privacy, and applicant reactions can be integrated to better understand responses to technological innovations in the workplace.

Keywords

Electronic monitoring Procedural justice Organizational attraction Social networking Privacy 

References

  1. Aguinis, H. (1995). Statistical power with moderated multiple regression in management research. Journal of Management, 21(6), 1141–1158. doi:10.1177/014920639502100607.Google Scholar
  2. Aguinis, H., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1997). Methodological artifacts in moderated multiple regression and their effects on statistical power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 192–206. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alder, G. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2005). Towards understanding fairness judgments associated with computer performance monitoring: An integration of the feedback, justice, and monitoring research. Human Resource Management Review, 15(1), 43–67. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alder, G. S., Schminke, M., Noel, T. W., & Kuenzi, M. (2007). Employee reactions to internet monitoring: The moderating role of ethical orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(3), 481–498. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9432-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alge, B. J. (2001). Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 797–804. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.86.4.797.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Alge, B. J., Ballinger, G. A., Tangirala, S., & Oakley, J. L. (2006). Information privacy in organizations: empowering creative and extrarole performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 221–232. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.221.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Allen, D. G., Mahto, R. V., & Otondo, R. F. (2007). Web-based recruitment: Effects of information, organizational brand, and attitudes toward a Web site on applicant attraction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1696–1708. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1696.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  9. Barger, T., Behrend, T. S., Sharek, D. J., & Sinar, E. F. (2011). I-O and the crowd: Frequently asked questions about using Mechanical Turk for research. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 49(2), 11–18.Google Scholar
  10. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160. doi:10.1177/0018726708094863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Sanchez, R. J., Craig, J. M., Ferrara, P., & Campion, M. A. (2001). Applicant reactions to selection: Development of the Selection Procedural Justice Scale (SPJS). Personnel Psychology, 54(2), 387–419. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00097.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Behrend, T. S., Sharek, D. J., Meade, A. W., & Wiebe, E. N. (2011). The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 800–813. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0081-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120(2), 189–208. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.189.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown, V. R., & Vaughn, E. D. (2011). The writing on the (Facebook) wall: The use of social networking sites in hiring decisions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(2), 219–225. doi:10.1007/s10869-011-9221-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2005). Contingent and alternative employment arrangements. (USDL Publication No. 05-1433). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  17. CareerBuilder.com. (2009). Forty-five percent of employers use networking sites to research job candidates, CareerBuilder survey finds. CareerBuilder.com. Retrieved January 20, 2010, from http://www.careerbuilder.com/share/aboutus/pressreleasesdetail.aspx?id=pr519&sd=8/19/2009&ed=12/31/2009&siteid=cbpr&sc_cmp1=cb_pr519_&cbRecursionCnt=3&cbsid=0c13dc78541544338f04998d7c0dd165-317523116-JD-5.
  18. Chen, J. V., & Ross, W. H. (2007). Individual differences and electronic monitoring at work. Information, Communication & Society, 10(4), 488–505. doi:10.1080/13691180701560002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Colquitt, J. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Davison, H. K., Maraist, C., & Bing, M. N. (2011). Friend or foe? The promise and pitfalls of using social networking sites for HR decisions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(2), 153–159. doi:10.1007/s10869-011-9215-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ducklin, P. (2009). Sophos Australia Facebook ID probe 2009. Sophos.com. Retrieved January 19, 2010, from http://www.sophos.com/blogs/duck/g/2009/12/06/facebook-id-probe-2009/.
  23. Duffy, E. (2006, November 1). Employers use Facebook in hiring process. The Observer. Retrieved from http://www.ndsmcobserver.com/2.2754/employers-use-facebook-in-hiring-process-1.263806.
  24. Eddy, E. R., Stone, D. L., & Stone-Romero, E. E. (1999). The effects of information management policies on reactions to human resource information systems: An integration of privacy and procedural justice perspectives. Personnel Psychology, 52(2), 335–358. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00164.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Finder, A. (2006, June 11). When a risqué online persona undermines a chance for a job. The New York Times, p. A1.Google Scholar
  28. Gamliel, E., & Peer, E. (2009). Effect of framing on applicants’ reactions to personnel Selection Methods. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(3), 282–289. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00470.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gilliland, S. W. (1993). The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational perspective. Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 694–734. doi:10.2307/258595.Google Scholar
  30. Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality Psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Goldberg, S. (2010). Young job-seekers hiding their Facebook pages. CNN.com. Retrieved April 20, 2010, from http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/03/29/facebook.job-seekers/index.html.
  32. Goldman, B. M. (2001). Toward an understanding of employment discrimination claiming: An integration of organizational justice and social information processing theories. Personnel Psychology, 54(2), 361–386. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00096.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks (the Facebook case). Paper presented at ACM workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society (WPES) (pp. 71–80). doi:10.1145/1102199.1102214.
  34. Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57(3), 639–683. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00003.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Highhouse, S., Lievens, F., & Sinar, E. F. (2003). Measuring attraction to organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 986–1001. doi:10.1177/0013164403258403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kluemper, D. H., Rosen, P. A., & Mossholder, K. W. (2012). Social networking websites, personality ratings, and the organizational context: More than meets the eye? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(5), 1143–1172. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00881.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kolb, K. J., & Aiello, J. R. (1996). The effects of electronic performance monitoring on stress: Locus of control as a moderator variable. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 407–423. doi:10.1016/0747-5632(96)00016-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–88). New York, NY: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Levinson, M. (2009). Job seekers to employers: Stop snooping! CIO. Retrieved June 16, 2009, from http://advice.cio.com/meridith_levinson/job_seekers_to_employers_stop_snooping.
  41. Levinson, M. (2011). Social networks: New hotbed for hiring discrimination claims. Computer World. Retrieved June 11, 2011, from http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9215907/Social_Networks_New_Hotbed_for_Hiring_Discrimination_Claims.
  42. Lorenzen-Huber, L., Boutain, M., Camp, L. J., Shankar, K., & Connelly, K. H. (2010). Privacy, technology, and aging: A proposed framework. Ageing International, 36(2), 232–252. doi:10.1007/s12126-010-9083-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Margulis, S. T. (2003). Privacy as a social issue and behavioral concept. Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 243–261. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McNichol, T. (2010). The gathering storm of social network litigation. HRO Today, 9(10). Retrieved from http://www.hrotoday.com/content/4756/gathering-storm-social-network-litigation.
  45. Murphy, K. R. (1986). When your top choice turns you down: Effect of rejected offers on the utility of selection tests. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 133–138. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  47. National Association of Colleges and Employers. (2006). More than one quarter of organizations have Goggled job candidates profiles. National Association of Colleges and Employers. Retrieved December 08, 2007, from http://www.naceweb.org/press/display.asp?year=2006&prid=240.
  48. Palank, J. (2006, July 17). Face it: “Book” no secret to employers; social sites used as background check. The Washington Times, p. A01.Google Scholar
  49. Ployhart, R. E., & Ryan, A. M. (1997). Toward an explanation of applicant reactions: An examination of organizational justice and attribution frameworks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72(3), 308–335. doi:10.1006/obhd. 1997.2742.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Ployhart, R. E., & Ryan, A. M. (1998). Applicants’ reactions to the fairness of selection procedures: The effects of positive rule violations and time of measurement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(1), 3–16. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.1.3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Raciot, B. M., & Williams, K. J. (1993). Perceived invasiveness and fairness of drug-testing procedures for current employees. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(22), 1879–1891. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01070.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ryan, A. M., Greguras, G. J., & Ployhart, R. E. (1997). Perceived job relatedness of physical abilities testing for firefighters: Exploring variations in reactions. Human Performance, 9, 219–240. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup0903_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rynes, S. L. (1993). Who’s selecting whom? Effects of selection practices on applicant attitudes and behavior. In N. Schmitt, W. C. Borman, & Associates (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 240–274). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  54. Rynes, S. L., Bretz, R. D., & Gerhart, B. (1991). The importance of recruitment in job choice: A different way of looking. Personnel Psychology, 44, 487–521. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb02402.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schiffman, L. (2007, November 12). Employers using Facebook information when hiring. North by Northwestern. Retrieved from http://www.northbynorthwestern.com/2007/11/5072/employers-use-facebook-information-when-hiring/.
  56. Shi, J., Lin, H., Wang, L., & Wang, M. (2009). Linking the Big Five personality constructs to organizational justice. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 37(2), 209–222. doi:10.2224/sbp.2009.37.2.209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stanton, J. (2000). Reactions to employee performance monitoring: Framework, review, and research directions. Human Performance, 13(1), 85–113. doi:10.1207/S15327043HUP1301_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stern, J. (2012). Maryland Bill Bans Employers From Facebook Passwords. ABC News. Retrieved April 08, 2013, from http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2012/04/maryland-bill-bans-employers-from-facebook-passwords/.
  59. Stone-Romero, E. F., Stone, D. L., & Hyatt, D. (2003). Personnel selection procedures and invasion of privacy. Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 343–368. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stoughton, J. W., Thompson, L. F., & Meade, A. W. (2013). Big Five personality traits reflected in job applicants’ social media postings. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(11), 800–805. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stutzman, F. (2006). An evaluation of identity-sharing behavior in social network communities. Journal of the International Digital Media and Arts Association, 3(1), 10–18.Google Scholar
  62. Tabak, F., & Smith, W. P. (2005). Privacy and electronic monitoring in the workplace: A model of managerial cognition and relational trust development. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17(3), 173–189. doi:10.1007/s10672-005-6940-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tam, D. (2013). Facebook by the numbers: 1.06 billion monthly active users. C-Net. Retrieved April 12, 2013, from http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57566550-93/facebook-by-the-numbers-1.06-billion-monthly-active-users/.
  64. Tolchinsky, P. D., McCuddy, M. K., Adams, J., Ganster, D. C., Woodman, R. W., & Fromkin, H. L. (1981). Employee perceptions of invasion of privacy: A field simulation experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 308–313. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.66.3.308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Truxillo, D. M., Bauer, T. N., Campion, M. A., & Paronto, M. E. (2006). A field study of the role of Big Five personality in applicant perceptions of selection fairness, self, and the hiring organization. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14(3), 269–277. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00351.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Turban, D. B., & Keon, T. L. (1993). Organizational attractiveness: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 184–193. doi:10.1037/00219010.78.2.184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Valdes, M., & McFarland, S. (2012, March 21). Privacy red flag raised as more job applicants asked to turn over Facebook passwords. The Associated Press. Retrieved from http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_20218922/privacy-red-flag-raised-more-job-applicants-asked.
  68. Vandenberg, R. (2011). Call for papers: Feature topic: Research design. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 581–582. doi:10.1177/1094428111411879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Westin, A. F. (1967). Privacy and freedom. New York, NY: Atheneum.Google Scholar
  70. Wiehl, L. (2008). The law behind hiring practices and the social networking website Facebook. Foxnews.com. Retrieved January 17, 2010, from http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,331970,00.html.
  71. Wortham, J. (2009). More employers use social networks to check out applicants. NYTimes.com. Retrieved January 19, 2010, from http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/20/more-employers-use-social-networks-to-check-out-applicants/.
  72. Zweig, D., & Webster, J. (2003). Personality as a moderator of monitoring acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(4), 479–493. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00075-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. William Stoughton
    • 1
  • Lori Foster Thompson
    • 1
  • Adam W. Meade
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations