Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 343–366 | Cite as

Analysis of Self-Reported Motives for Task-Related Helping: Implications for an Integrated Theory of Helping

  • Thomas D. TaberEmail author
  • Kanchan Deosthali



In organizations where work is complex, dynamic and interdependent, maintaining an environment where employees offer help to one another is essential for organizational effectiveness. This research is aimed at understanding the antecedent motives underlying task-related interpersonal helping.


The research took an atypical approach by asking employees directly to explain in their own words why they would, or would not, help co-workers with work-related problems. Content analysis yielded five categories of motives for helping. The qualitative motive categories were able to explain variance in quantitative scales assessing respondents’ affect, attitudes, organizational perceptions, and demographics.


Employees who gave altruistic reasons for helping (i.e., helping was a personal value or a contribution to the team) reported performing more helping behaviors, expressed greater organizational commitment, and perceived more organizational justice than did employees who expected reciprocity for helping, or whose help was contingent.


No existing theory of helping explains the total collection of motives identified in this research. We encourage researchers to develop integrated theories capable of explaining the totality of motives for task-related helping. Our research identities several essential parameters of such integrated theories and provides guidance for carrying out the task of theory integration.


This phenomenological research is the only empirical investigations into task-related helping based on respondents’ own reasons for helping. It also is one of the few to incorporate both qualitative and quantitative methodologies.


Helping OCB Motivation Norms Social exchange Qualitative 



The authors thank Dr. Marcus Crede and Dr. Dianna Stone for their comments and suggestions on this research


  1. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antaki, C. (1989). Structured causal beliefs and their defense in accounts of student political action. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 8, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagozzi, R. P., Bergami, M., & Leone, L. (2003). Hierarchical representation of motives in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 915–943.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagozzi, R. P., & Dabholkar, P. A. (1994). Customer recycling goals and their effect on decisions to recycle: A means-end chain analysis. Psychology and Marketing, 11, 313–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagozzi, R. P., & Dabholkar, P. A. (2000). Discursive psychology: An alternative conceptual foundation to means-end chain theory. Psychology and Marketing, 17, 535–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, T. E., & Vance, R. J. (1993). Construct validity of three types of organizational citizenship behavior: An illustration of the direct product model with refinements. Journal of Management, 19, 663–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergeron, D. (2007). The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizens at what cost? Academy of Management Review, 32, 1078–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bergeron, D., Shipp, A., Rosen, B., & Furst, S. (2013). Organizational citizenship behaviors and career outcomes: The cost of being a good citizen. Journal of Management, 39, 958–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Bolino, M., Turnley, W., & Neihoff, B. (2004). The other side of the story: Re-examining prevailing assumptions about organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource, Management Review, 14, 229–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Crede, M. (2011). Personal communication.Google Scholar
  13. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31, 874–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dovido, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., & Penner, L. A. (2010). The social psychology of prosocial behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Dudley, N. M., & Cortina, Jose. M. (2008). Knowledge and skills that facilitate the personal support dimension of citizenship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1249–1270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehrhart, M. G., & Naumann, S. E. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior in work groups: A group norms approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 960–974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eisenberger, R., Cotterell, N., & Marvel, J. (1987). Reciprocation ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 743–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1998). How to study thinking in everyday life: Contrasting think-aloud protocols and explanations of thinking. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5, 178–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology; the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frost, B. C., Ko, C.-H. E., & James, L. R. (2007). Implicit and explicit personality: A test of a channeling hypothesis for aggressive behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1299–1319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Furnham, A. (2003). Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 795–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. George, J. M. (2009). The illusion of will in organizational behavior research: Nonconscious processes and job design. Journal of Management, 35, 1318–1339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (1997). Organizational spontaneity in context. Human Performance, 10, 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  29. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grant, A. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32, 393–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grant, A. M., Dutton, J. E., & Rosso, B. D. (2008). Giving commitment: Employee support programs and the prosocial sensemaking process. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 898–918.Google Scholar
  32. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  33. Harris, S. (1994). Organizational culture and individual sensemaking: A schema-based perspective. Organization Science, 5, 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorf, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hollensbe, E. C., Khazanchi, S., & Masterson, S. S. (2008). How do I assess if my supervisor and organization are fair? Identifying the rules underlying entity-based justice perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 1099–1116.Google Scholar
  36. Huffmeier, J., & Hertel, G. (2011). Many cheers make light the work: How social support triggers process gains in teams. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26, 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ilies, R., Fulmer, I. S., Spitzmuller, M., & Johnson, M. D. (2009). Personality and citizenship behavior: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 945–959.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Leader–member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 269–277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ilies, R., Scott, B. A., & Judge, T. A. (2006). The interactive effects of personal traits and experienced states on intraindividual patterns of citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 561–575.Google Scholar
  40. Johnson, R., Chang, C. H., & Yang, L. Q. (2010). Commitment and motivation at work: The relevance of employee identity and regulatory focus. Academy of Management Review, 35, 226–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 530–541.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kaplan, S., Bradley, J. C., Luchman, J. N., & Haynes, D. (2009). On the role of positive and negative affectivity in job performance: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 162–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kidwell, R. E., Jr, Mossholder, K. W., & Bennett, N. (1997). Cohesiveness and organizational citizenship behavior: A multilevel analysis using work groups and individuals. Journal of Management, 23, 775–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Konovsky, M. A., & Organ, D. (1996). Dispositional and contextual determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 656–669.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Krebs, D. (1970). Altruism—An examination of the concept and a review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 258–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  49. Kunin, T. (1955). The construction of a new type of job attitude measure. Personnel Psychology, 8, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Leeds, R. (1963). Altruism and the norm of giving. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 9, 229–240.Google Scholar
  52. LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 52–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Peer responses to low performers: An attributional model of helping in the context of groups. Academy of Management Review, 26, 67–84.Google Scholar
  54. Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 1030–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2004). What should we do about motivation theory? Six recommendations for the twenty-first century. Academy of Management Review, 29, 388–403.Google Scholar
  56. Mayfield, C. O., & Taber, T. D. (2010). A prosocial self-concept approach to understanding organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25, 741–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Meyer, J. P., & Mulherin, A. (1980). From attribution to helping: An analysis of the mediating effects of affect and expectancy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Moorman, R. H., & Blakely, G. L. (1995). Individualism–collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee’s perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1543–1567.Google Scholar
  60. Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmitt, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10, 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mowday, R., Steers, R. H., & Porter, L. M. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 527–556.Google Scholar
  63. Nielsen, T. M., Hrivnak, G. A., & Shaw, M. (2009). Organizational citizenship behavior and performance: A meta-analysis of group-level research. Small Group Research, 40, 555–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S., Viswesvaran, C., & Judge, T. A. (2007). In support of personality assessment in organizational settings. Personnel Psychology, 60, 995–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Organ, D. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10, 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Mackenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  67. Pearce, J. L., & Gergensen, H. B. (1991). Task interdependence and extra-role behavior: A test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 838–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Piliavin, J. A., & Charng, H. W. (1990). Altruism: A review of recent theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 27–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996). A meta-analysis of the relationships between Kerr and Jermier’s substitutes for leadership and employee job attitudes, role perception, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 80–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leaders, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26, 513–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Podsakoff, P., & Organ, D. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. B. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 122–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1986). The handbook of organizational measurement. Marshfield: M.A. Pittman.Google Scholar
  75. Reynolds, T. J., & Gutman, J. (1988). Laddering theory, method, analysis and interpretation. Journal of Advertising Research, 28, 11–31.Google Scholar
  76. Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698–714.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rioux, S. M., & Penner, L. A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1306–1314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Roberts, B. W., Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires. Personnel Psychology, 58, 101–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Scandura, T. A., & Graen, G. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader–member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 428–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Shamir, B. (1991). Meaning, self and motivation in organizations. Organization Studies, 12, 405–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Shore, L. M., Bommer, W. H., Rao, A. N., & Seo, J. (2009). Social and economic exchange in the employee-organization relationship: The moderating role of reciprocation wariness. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24, 701–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Shore, L. M., & Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M. (2003). New developments in the employee–organization relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sommerfield, E. (2010). The subjective experience of generosity. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and BEHAVIOR: The better angels of our nature, (Chap. 16). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  85. Spence, J. R., Ferris, D. L., Brown, D. J., & Heller, D. (2011). Understanding daily citizenship behaviors: A social comparison perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 547–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Stone-Romero, E. F., Alvarez, K., & Thompson, L. F. (2009). The construct validity of conceptual and operational definitions of contextual performance and related constructs. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 104–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  88. Taber, T. D. (1991). Triangulating job attitudes with interpretive and positivist measurement methods. Personnel Psychology, 44, 577–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Taber, T. D., & Taylor, E. (1990). A review and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Personnel Psychology, 43, 467–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tepper, B. J., & Taylor, E. C. (2003). Relationships among supervisors’ and subordinates’ procedural justice perceptions and organizational citizenship behaviors. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 97–105.Google Scholar
  91. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., & Tellegen, A. E. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 820–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Weick, K. (1995). Sense-making in organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  94. Weick, K. (2000). Making sense of the organization. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  95. Weiner, B. (1980). A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of judgments of help-giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 186–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wents, D. R. (1994). Prosocial organizational behavior and the dimension of beneficiary. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
  97. Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Witt, A. (1991). Equal opportunity perceptions and job attitudes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 431–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessState University of New York at AlbanyAlbanyUSA
  2. 2.College of BusinessUniversity of Mary WashingtonFredericksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations