Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Title VII Sex and Race Discrimination Litigation Settlements as Opportunities for Organizational Change

  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigated how frequently and under what circumstances Title VII lawsuit settlements resulted in mandates for substantive organizational change in HR policies and practices that, according to social science research, are likely to move beyond mere pro forma compliance to foster greater inclusion and equality.

Design/Methodology/Approach

502 consent decrees settling Title VII sex and race discrimination lawsuits in 200–2008 were collected, coded, and analyzed. Multinomial logistic regression was used. Sociological theories of organizational change and of the relationship between law and organizations informed the study.

Findings

48 % of the consent decrees examined specified no meaningful substantive changes; 31 % required formalization of personnel decision-making remedies; 21 % required more innovative measures. Certified class actions, other non-individual lawsuits, lawsuits filed in more liberal Federal District Courts, and public sector employer predicted more substantive remedies for organizational change in organizations’ EEO policies and practices, all else being equal. Single plaintiffs and a conservative District Court legal environment predicted a greater likelihood of pro forma only remedies.

Implications

Discrimination lawsuit settlements are a potential impetus for improved diversity management policies.

Originality/Value

Consent decrees are an unusually direct and potentially powerful mechanism under Title VII for employment discrimination lawsuits to mandate substantive organizational change. Whereas a few studies have discussed a very small number of high-profile settlements, this is the first systematic examination of the programmatic mandates in consent decrees and how they vary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bendick, M., Egan, M., & Lofhjelm, S. (2001). Workforce diversity training: From anti-discrimination compliance to organizational development. Human Resource Planning, 24(2), 10–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisom-Rapp, S. (1999). Bulletproofing the workplace. Florida State University Law Review, 26, 959–1049.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisom-Rapp, S., Cosby, F., & Stocksdale, M. (2007). A critical look at organizational responses to and remedies for sex discrimination. In F. Cosby, M. Stockdale, & A. Ropp (Eds.), Sex discrimination in the workplace. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisted: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbin, F. (2009). Inventing equal opportunity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2007). How to stop harassment: The professional construction of legal compliance in organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 112(4), 1203–1243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, L. B. (1990). Legal environments and organizational governance: The expansion of due process in the American workplace. American Journal of Sociology, 95(6), 1401–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, L. B. (1992). Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. American Journal of Sociology, 97(6), 1531–1576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, L. B., & Suchman, M. C. (1997). The legal environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 479–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EEOC. (2005). Regional Attorneys’ Manual. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/litigation/manual/index.html. Accessed 2 Apr 2013.

  • Fonow, M. M. (2003). Union women: Forging feminism in the United Steelworkers of America. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, T. (2003). Targeting workplace context: Title VII as a tool for institutional reform. Fordham Law Review, 72(1), 659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, T., & Kalev, A. (2008). Discrimination-reducing measures at the relational level. Hastings Law Journal, 59, 1435–1464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, D., & Roth, L. M. (1999). The state, courts, and equal opportunities for female CEOs in US organizations: Specifying institutional mechanisms. Social Forces, 78(2), 511–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegewisch, A., Deitch, C., & Murphy, E. (2011). Ending sex and race discrimination in the workplace: Legal interventions that push the envelope. Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, C. E. (2008). Settling for less: Organizational determinants of discrimination-charge outcomes. Law & Society Review, 42, 239–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, C. E. (2009). The strength of weak enforcement: The impact of discrimination charges, legal environments, and organizational conditions on workplace segregation. American Sociological Review, 74(2), 245–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, C. E., & Kornrich, S. (2008). The context of discrimination: Workplace conditions, institutional environments, and sex and race discrimination charges. American Journal of Sociology, 113(5), 1394–1432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, E. H., & Wooten, L. P. (2006). Diversity crises: How firms manage discrimination lawsuits. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1103–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71, 589–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, E. (2010). Failure to update: An institutional perspective on noncompliance with the Family and Medical Leave Act. Law & Society Review, 44(1), 33–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, E., & Dobbin, F. (1998). How affirmative action became diversity management. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(7), 960–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, A. M., & Linnehan, F. (1995). Formalized HRM structures: Coordinating equal employment opportunity or concealing organizational practices? Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 787–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levit, N. (2008). Megacases, diversity, and the elusive goal of workplace reform. Boston College Law Review, 49, 367–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., Berrey, E., & Nielsen, L. B. (2008). Divergent paths: Conflicting conceptions of employment discrimination in law and the social sciences. Annual Review of Law & Society, 4, 103–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, L. B., Nelson, R. L., Lancaster, R., & Pedriana, N. (2008). Contesting workplace discrimination in court: Characteristics and outcomes of federal employment discrimination litigation 1987–2003. Chicago, IL: American Bar Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Occhialino, A., & Vail, D. (2005). Why the EEOC still matters. Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal, 22, 671–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, B. (1998). The realities of affirmative action in employment. Washington, DC: The American Sociological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, B. (2000). The proximate causes of employment discrimination. Contemporary Sociology, 29(2), 319–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, B. (2002). Rethinking employment discrimination and its remedies. In M. F. Guillen, R. Collins, P. England, & M. Meyer (Eds.), The new economic sociology: Developments in an emerging field (pp. 218–244). New York, NY: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selmi, M. (2003). The price of discrimination: The nature of class action employment discrimination litigation and its effects. Texas Law Review, 81, 1249–1335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, L. (2006). Systemic taskforce report to the Chair of the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission. Washington, DC: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaggs, S. (2008). Producing change or bagging opportunity? The effects of discrimination litigation on women in supermarket management. American Journal of Sociology, 113(4), 1148–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, S. (2001). Second generation employment discrimination: A structural approach. Columbia Law Review, 101(1), 458–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J. R., & Dobbin, F. (1996). The two faces of governance: Responses to legal uncertainty in US firms, 1955 to 1985. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 794–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J. R., Dobbin, F., Meyer, J. W., & Scott, R. (1994). The legalization of the workplace. American Journal of Sociology, 99(4), 944–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomakovic-Devey, D., & Stainback, K. (2007). Discrimination and desegregation: Equal opportunity progress in US private sector workplaces since the Civil Rights Act. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 609, 49–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, P. (1975). Equal employment opportunity and the AT&T case. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. 2011. Dukes, 564 U.S.: 131 S. Ct. 2541.

  • Wooten, L. P., & James, E. H. (2004). When firms fail to learn: The perpetuation of discrimination in the workplace. Journal of Management Inquiry, 13(1), 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Women’s Studies Program, George Washington University, 837 22nd St. NW, Washington, DC, 20052, USA

    Cynthia Deitch

  2. Institute for Women’s Policy Research, Washington, DC, USA

    Ariane Hegewisch

Authors
  1. Cynthia Deitch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ariane Hegewisch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cynthia Deitch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deitch, C., Hegewisch, A. Title VII Sex and Race Discrimination Litigation Settlements as Opportunities for Organizational Change. J Bus Psychol 28, 425–438 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9294-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9294-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation