Religious Discrimination in the Workplace: A Review and Examination of Current and Future Trends
- 5.4k Downloads
Over the last decade, religious discrimination claims have risen more rapidly compared to most other protected categories under the Civil Rights Act (CRA). The goal of this review paper is to summarize the psychological and HR practitioner-focused research on religious discrimination as it relates to the CRA to understand these religious discrimination claims. In doing so, this review also highlights what future research is needed, and what the challenges and practical implications of religious discrimination are for managers.
We conduct a systematic literature review of the psychology and business research on religious discrimination.
Building from the literature review and case law, we highlight four trends that contribute to religious discrimination in the workplace: (1) legal ambiguities, (2) increased religious diversity in the American workforce, (3) increasing expression of religious beliefs, and (4) the unique nature of religion.
The trends identified in our review paper highlight the need for employers to understand and address religious discrimination issues in the workplace and the lack of empirical research in this area points to a critical gap in our understanding of workplace religious discrimination that warrants future research.
In addition to highlighting trends that contribute to religious discrimination in the workplace, this literature review addresses where there are gaps in the existing research that call for further research and offers practical implications for employers and organizations.
KeywordsReligious discrimination Civil rights act Religious diversity Religious harassment Religious accommodations Religious expression
- Allen, C., & Nielsen, J. S. (2002). Summary report on Islamophobia in the EU after 11 September 2001. Vienna: European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia.Google Scholar
- American Religious Identification Survey. (2009). ARIS 2008 Summary report. Retrieved from http://www.americanreligionsurvey-aris.org/reports/ARIS_Report_2008.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2012.
- Anonymous. (2012). Supreme Court fashions ministerial exception to employment discrimination laws. Bruce R. Hopkins’ Nonprofit Counsel, 29, 1.Google Scholar
- Anderson v. OCTA, Calif. Superior Ct, No. 765255 (June 17, 1996).Google Scholar
- Anti-Defamation League. (2011). Religious accommodation in the workplace: Your rights and accommodations. Retrieved from http://www.adl.org/religious_freedom/resource_kit/religion_workplace.asp#f6. Accessed 17 July 2012.
- Ball, C., & Haque, A. (2003). Diversity in religious practice: Implications of Islamic values in the public workplace. Public Personnel Management, 32, 315–330.Google Scholar
- Borstorff, P., & Arlington, K. (2010). The perils of religious accommodation: Employees’ perceptions. Allied academies international conference: Proceedings of the academy of legal. Ethical and regulatory issues, 14, 1–5.Google Scholar
- Boulter, B. (2011). Goldilocks and the three-judge panel: Spencer v. World Vision, Inc. and the Religious Organization Exemption of Title VII. Brigham Young University Law Review, 1, 33–48.Google Scholar
- Buonanno v. AT&T Broadband LLC, USDC, No. 02-MK-0778 (April 1, 2004).Google Scholar
- Center for Immigration Studies. (2002). Immigrants from the Middle East: A profile of the foreign-born population from Pakistan to Morocco. Retrieved from http://www.cis.org/articles/2002/back902.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2012.
- Civil Rights Act of 1964. (1964). Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.Google Scholar
- Coon, L. L. (2001). Employment discrimination by religious institutions: Limiting the sanctuary of the constitutional ministerial exception to religion-based employment decisions. Vanderbilt Law Review, 54, 481–546.Google Scholar
- Creusere v. James Hunt Constr., 83 F. App’x 709, 711 (6th. Cir.2003).Google Scholar
- Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1994). Reactions to stigma: The moderating role of justifications. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The Ontario symposium vol. 7. The psychology of prejudice (pp. 289–314). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Curtis, H. P. (2004). Ex-Disney employee sues over dress code. Sun-Sentinel, 3a.Google Scholar
- Deschenaux, J. (2011). Nontraditional workplace harassment lawsuits increasing. Retrieved from http://www.shrm.org/LegalIssues/FederalResources/Pages/Nontraditionalwww.shrm.org/LegalIssues/FederalResources/Pages/Nontraditional. Accessed 17 July 2012.
- Dobson, S. (2010). Calm amidst the storm, reflection rooms provide privacy, peace and religious accommodation at work. Canadian HR Reporter, 23(17), 23.Google Scholar
- Elkhatib v. Dunkin’Donuts, Inc., No. 02 C 8131, 2004 WL 2600119 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 15, 2004).Google Scholar
- EEOC. (2003). Muslim/Arab employment discrimination charges since 9/11. Retrieved November 22, 2004 from http://www.eeoc.gov/origin/z-stats.html.
- EEOC. (2008a). Religious discrimination. Retrieved April 22, 2009 from http://www.eeoc.gov/types/religion.html.
- EEOC. (2008b). Best practices for eradicating religious discrimination in the workplace. Retrieved March 15, 2012 from http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/best_practices_religion.html.
- EEOC. (2011a). Charge statistics FY 1997 through FY 2010. Retrieved January 31, 2011 from http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/charges.cfm.
- EEOC. (2011b). Compliance manual section 12—religious discrimination. Retrieved January 31, 2011 from http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/religion.html.
- EEOC. (2011c). Abercrombie and Fitch sued for religious discrimination [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/6-27-11a.cfm. Accessed 17 July 2012.
- EEOC. (2011d). Court finds for EEOC in religious discrimination suit against Abercrombie and Fitch [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/7-15-11a.cfm. Accessed 17 July 2012.
- EEOC. (2011e). Taco bell owner sued by EEOC for religious discrimination [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/7-28-11.cfm. Accessed 17 July 2012.
- EEOC .(2011f). Supercuts settles EEOC religious discrimination and retaliation lawsuit [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/9-14-11.cfm. Accessed 17 July 2012.
- EEOC. (2011g). Questions and answers: Religious discrimination in the workplace. Retrieved October 5, 2011 from http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/quanda_religion.html.
- EEOC v. White Lodging Services, Corp. W.D. Ky., No. 3:06-CV-353 (March 31, 2010).Google Scholar
- Elizabethton Star (2004). CitiGroup settles religious discrimination lawsuit filed by former employee. Retrieved from http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=ybQOAAAAIBAJandsjid=w4IDAAAAIBAJandpg=2632%2C2145955. Accessed 17 July 2012.
- Estreicher, S., & Gray, M. J. (2006). Religion and the US workplace. Human Rights, 33, 17–20.Google Scholar
- Ettorre, B. (1996). Religion in the workplace: Implications for managers. Management Review, 85, 15–20.Google Scholar
- Fitzgerald, L. F., Swan, S. C., & Magley, V. J. (1997b). But was it really sexual harassment? Legal, behavioral, and psychological definitions of the workplace victimization of women. In W. O’Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Gallup Poll. (2006). Religion. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/1690/Religion.aspx. Accessed 17 July 2012.
- Kern v. Dynalectron Corp., 577 F. Supp. 1196 (N.D. Tex. 1983).Google Scholar
- Minkus v. Metro. Sanitary Dist., 600 F.2d 80 (7th Cir. 1979).Google Scholar
- Grossman, R. J. (2008). Religion at work. HR Magazine, 53(12), 26–33.Google Scholar
- Gutek, B. A., & Stockdale, M. S. (2005). Sex discrimination in employment. In F. Landy (Ed.), Employment discrimination litigation: Behavioral, quantitative and legal perspectives (pp. P229–P255). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Harrison, D. A., & Sin, H. (2006). What is diversity and how should it be measured? In A. Konrad, P. Prasad, & J. K. Pringle (Eds.), Handbook of workplace diversity (pp. 191–216). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
- Heller, L. (2007). Modifying the ministerial exception: Providing ministers with a remedy for employment discrimination under Title VII while maintaining First Amendment protections of religious freedom. St. John’s Law Review, 81, 663–699.Google Scholar
- Henle, C. A., & Hogler, R. (2004). The duty of accommodations and the Workplace Religious Freedom Act of 2003: From bad policy to worse law. Labor Law Journal, 55, 155–164.Google Scholar
- Inman, D. F., & Inman, R. A. (2003). The workplace religious freedom act: ADA problem under a new name. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 6, 41–51.Google Scholar
- Jones, E. E., Farina, A., Hastorf, A. H., Markus, H., Miller, D. T., & Scott, R. A. (1984). Social stigma: The psychology of marked relationships. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
- Landy, F. (2005). Employment discrimination litigation: behavioral, quantitative and legal perspectives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- LeVine, R. A., & Campbell, D. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Lubin, J. (2004, December 7). How to stop the snubs that demoralize you and your colleagues?. Wall Street Journal, pp. B1.Google Scholar
- Major, B., & Kaiser, C. R. (2005). Perceiving and claiming discrimination. In L. B. Nielsen & R. L. Nelson (Eds.), The handbook of research on employment discrimination: Rights and realities (pp. 279–293). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Morgan, J. F. (2004). How should business respond to a more religious workplace? SAM Advanced Management Journal, 69, 11–19.Google Scholar
- Nichols, J. L. (2008). The influence of coworker justice perceptions on worksite accommodations and the return to work of persons with disabilities. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 39(3), 33–39.Google Scholar
- Noyes v. Kelly Services Inc., 488 F.3d 1163 (9th Cir. 2007).Google Scholar
- Rawtuszko, M. (2009). Communication in the conditions of diversity. Kobieta i Biznes, 1–4, 53–56.Google Scholar
- Risley v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 929 F.2d 701 (6th Cir. 1991).Google Scholar
- Rodriguez v. City of Chicago, 156 F.3d 771 (7th Cir. September 21, 1998).Google Scholar
- McClure v. Salvation Army, 460 F.2d 553, 558–60 (5th Cir. 1972).Google Scholar
- Shaheen, J. G. (1997). Arab and Muslim stereotyping in American popular culture. Washington: Georgetown University Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding.Google Scholar
- SHRM. (2008). Religion and corporate culture. Alexandria: Society of Human Resource Management.Google Scholar
- Smith, D. (2004). Workplace religious freedom: What is an employer’s duty to accommodate? A review of recent cases. The ALSB Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 10, 49–65.Google Scholar
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
- Tanenbaum Center for Interreligious Understanding. (1999). Religious bias in workplace: the Tanenbaum center’s 1999 survey of employees—executive summary. New York: Author.Google Scholar
- Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C 2000e(j), 1994.Google Scholar
- Townley Eng’g & Mfg. Co., 859 F.2d 610, 618 (9th Cir. 1988).Google Scholar
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hardison. (1977). 432 U.S. 63.Google Scholar
- Tolani v. Upper Southampton Township, 158 F. Supp. 2d 593 (E.D. Pa. 2001).Google Scholar
- VNU Business Media. (2004). Taboo no more. WLNR, 1377221.Google Scholar
- Von Bergen, C., & Bressler, M. (2011). A matter of conscience: do conflicting beliefs and workplace demands constitute religious discrimination? Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business, 3, 1–14.Google Scholar
- Webb v. City of Philadelphia. 562 F.3d 256 (3d Cir. April 7, 2009).Google Scholar
- Zaheer, B. (2007). Accommodating minority religions under Title VII: How Muslims make the case for a new interpretation of section 701(J). University of Illinois Law Review, 2007, 497–534.Google Scholar
- Zayed v. (2006). Apple computers. F.Supp.2d, WL 889571 (N.D. Cal. 2006).Google Scholar