Advertisement

Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 407–420 | Cite as

Assessing Workgroup Norms for Civility: The Development of the Civility Norms Questionnaire-Brief

  • Benjamin M. WalshEmail author
  • Vicki J. Magley
  • David W. Reeves
  • Kimberly A. Davies-Schrils
  • Matthew D. Marmet
  • Jessica A. Gallus
Article

Abstract

Purpose

This research describes the development and validation of the Civility Norms Questionnaire-Brief (CNQ-B), a 4-item measure designed to assess workgroup climate for civility. Climate for civility is defined as employee perceptions of norms supporting respectful treatment among workgroup members.

Design/Methodology/Approach

Five samples (N = 2,711) of adult employees, including two from distinct organizations and three from multiple organizations, responded to the CNQ-B and additional measures.

Findings

Evidence for the internal consistency, and convergent and discriminant validity of the CNQ-B was observed. Additionally, evidence for the criterion-related and incremental validity of the CNQ-B was demonstrated as it was a significant predictor of later-assessed incivility experiences and accounted for significant variability in work attitudes beyond incivility experiences and related measures.

Implications

The CNQ-B is a psychometrically sound instrument despite being composed of only four items. The CNQ-B can be used by researchers and practitioners alike to assess climate for civility, to study climate for civility as a precursor to incivility experiences, and to target workgroups that could benefit from interventions (e.g., training) to enhance civility and reduce incivility.

Originality/Value

This is one of the first studies to conduct a rigorous psychometric assessment of a measure of workgroup climate for civility that is grounded in theory and research on workplace civility and incivility. At four items, the CNQ-B is the shortest assessment tool currently available that is designed for this purpose.

Keywords

Workplace incivility Workplace civility Workplace norms Climate Scale development 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by Grant Number 5T01OH008610-07 awarded to Vicki Magley from CDC-NIOSH. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NIOSH.

References

  1. Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24, 452–471.Google Scholar
  2. Balfour, D. L., & Wechsler, B. (1996). Organizational commitment: Antecedents and outcomes in public organizations. Public Productivity & Management Review, 19, 256–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, R. J., Aquino, K., Reed, A., & Thau, S. (2005). The normative nature of employee deviance and the impact of moral identity. In S. Fox & P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 107–125). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43–55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. R. (1983). The Michigan organizational assessment questionnaire: Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational members. In S. E. Seashore, E. E. Lawler, P. H. Mervis, & C. Cammann (Eds.), Assessing organizational change: A guide to methods, measures, and practices (pp. 71–138). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caza, B. B., & Cortina, L. M. (2007). From insult to injury: Explaining the impact of incivility. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 462–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2009). Patterns and profiles of response to incivility in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 272–288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 64–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dion, K. L. (2000). Group cohesion: From “field of forces” to multidimensional construct. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Donovan, M. A., Drasgow, F., & Munson, L. J. (1998). The Perceptions of Fair Interpersonal Treatment scale: Development and validation of a measure of interpersonal treatment in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 683–692.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feldman, D. C. (1984). The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 9, 47–53.Google Scholar
  17. Fiske, S. T. (2004). Social beings: A core motives approach to social psychology. New Brunswick, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Gill, M. J., & Sypher, B. D. (2009). Workplace incivility and organizational trust. In P. Lutgen-Sandvik & B. D. Sypher (Eds.), Destructive organizational communication: Processes, consequences, and constructive ways of organizing (pp. 53–73). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Glomb, T. M., & Liao, H. (2003). Interpersonal aggression in work groups: Social influence, reciprocal, and individual effects. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 486–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Griffin, B. (2010). Multilevel relationships between organizational-level incivility, justice and intention to stay. Work & Stress, 24, 309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hackman, J. R. (1992). Group influences on individuals in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Haugh (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 199–267). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  23. Hershcovis, M. S., & Barling, J. (2010). Towards a multi-foci approach to workplace aggression: A meta-analytic review of outcomes from different perpetrators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hicks-Clarke, D., & Iles, P. (2000). Climate for diversity and its effects on career and organizational attitudes and perceptions. Personnel Review, 29, 324–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14, 6–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jex, S. M., Geimer, J. L. B., Clark, O., Guidroz, A. M., & Yugo, J. E. (2010). Challenges and recommendations in the measurement of workplace incivility. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Insidious workplace behavior (pp. 239–271). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, P. R., & Indvik, J. (2001). Slings and arrows of rudeness: Incivility in the workplace. Journal of Management Development, 20, 705–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jöreskob, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8.5: User’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  31. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kessler, S. R., Spector, P. E., Chang, C., & Parr, A. D. (2008). Organizational violence and aggression: Development of the three-factor violence climate survey. Work & Stress, 22, 108–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kim, J., & Mueller, C. W. (1978). Introduction to factor analysis: What it is and how to do it. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kossek, E. E., & Zonia, S. C. (1993). Assessing diversity climate: A field study of reactions to employer efforts to promote diversity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. Klein & S. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  37. Lim, S., & Cortina, L. M. (2005). Interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace: The interface and impact of general incivility and sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 483–496.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lim, S., Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2008). Personal and workgroup incivility: Impact on work and health outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 95–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lim, S., & Lee, A. (2011). Work and nonwork outcomes of workplace incivility: Does family support help? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 95–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Martin, R. J., & Hine, D. W. (2005). Development and Validation of the Uncivil Workplace Behavior Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 477–490.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meng, X., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 172–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Meterko, M., Osatuke, K., Mohr, D., Warren, N., & Dyrenforth, S. (2007, August). Civility: The development and psychometric assessment of a survey measure. In M. Nagy (Moderator), Measuring and assessing workplace civility: Do “nice” organizations finish first? Symposium presented at the 67th annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  44. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  45. Miner-Rubino, K., & Cortina, L. M. (2007). Beyond targets: Consequences of vicarious exposure to misogyny at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1254–1269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Miner-Rubino, K., & Reed, W. D. (2010). Testing a moderated mediational model of workgroup incivility: The roles of organizational trust and group regard. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 3148–3168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Morrison, E. W. (2006). Doing the job well: An investigation of pro-social rule breaking. Journal of Management, 32, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Naylor, J. C., Pritchard, R. D., & Ilgen, D. R. (1980). A theory of behavior in organizations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  49. Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 527–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Osatuke, K., Moore, S. C., Ward, C., Dyrenforth, S. R., & Belton, L. (2009). Civility, respect, engagement in the workforce (CREW): Nationwide organization development intervention at Veterans Health Administration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 45, 384–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ostroff, C., Kinicki, A. J., & Clark, M. A. (2002). Substantive and operational issues of response bias across levels of analysis: An example of climate-satisfaction relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 355–368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Parker, C. P., Baltes, B. B., Young, S. A., Huff, J. W., Altmann, R. A., LaCost, H. A., et al. (2003). Relationships between psychological climate perceptions and work outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 389–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pearson, C. M., Andersson, L. M., & Porath, C. L. (2000). Assessing and attacking workplace incivility. Organizational Dynamics, 29, 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pearson, C. M., Andersson, L. M., & Porath, C. L. (2005). Workplace Incivility. In S. Fox & P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 177–200). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pearson, C. M., Andersson, L. M., & Wegner, J. W. (2001). When workers flout convention: A study of workplace incivility. Human Relations, 54, 1387–1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pearson, C. M., & Porath, C. L. (2005). On the nature, consequences and remedies of workplace incivility: Not time for “nice”? Think again. Academy of Management Executive, 19, 7–18.Google Scholar
  57. Peck, D. L. (2002). Civility: A contemporary context for a meaningful historical concept. Sociological Inquiry, 72, 358–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Penney, L., & Spector, P. E. (2005). Job stress, incivility, and counterproductive work behavior: The moderating role of negative affectivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 777–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Porath, C. L., & Erez, A. (2007). Does rudeness really matter? The effects of rudeness on task performance and helpfulness. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1181–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Porath, C. L., & Erez, A. (2009). Overlooked but not untouched: How rudeness reduces onlookers’ performance on routine and creative tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Porath, C. L., & Pearson, C. M. (2010). The cost of bad behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 39, 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Porath, C. L., Shapiro, D. L., & Duffy, M. K. (2004, August). When does perceived incivility lead to production deviance? A test of a systemwide perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  63. Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1997). Workplace deviance: Its definition, its manifestations, and its causes. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 6, 3–27.Google Scholar
  65. Schneider, B., & Reichers, A. E. (1983). On the etiology of climates. Personnel Psychology, 36, 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sliter, M., Jex, S., Wolford, K., & McInnerney, J. (2010). How rude! Emotional labor as a mediator between customer incivility and employee outcomes. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15, 468–481.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Smith, P. C., Kendall, L., & Hulin, C. L. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  68. Stanton, J. M., & Weiss, E. M. (2002). Online panels for social science research: An introduction to the Study Response project (Technical report no. 13001; www.studyresponse.com). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University School of Information Studies.
  69. Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1972). Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sypher, B. D. (2004). Reclaiming civil discourse in the workplace. Southern Communication Journal, 69, 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin M. Walsh
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Vicki J. Magley
    • 1
  • David W. Reeves
    • 1
  • Kimberly A. Davies-Schrils
    • 1
  • Matthew D. Marmet
    • 1
  • Jessica A. Gallus
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  2. 2.Department of ManagementUniversity of Illinois SpringfieldSpringfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations