The Writing on the (Facebook) Wall: The Use of Social Networking Sites in Hiring Decisions

Article

Abstract

The popular media has reported an increase in the use of social networking sites (SNSs) such as Facebook by hiring managers and human resource professionals attempting to find more detailed information about job applicants. Within the peer-reviewed literature, cursory empirical evidence exists indicating that others’ judgments of characteristics or attributes of an individual based on information obtained from SNSs may be accurate. Although this predictor method provides a potentially promising source of applicant information on predictor constructs of interest, it is also fraught with potential limitations and legal challenges. The level of publicly available data obtainable by employers is highly unstandardized across applicants, as some applicants will choose not to use SNSs at all while those choosing to use SNSs customize the degree to which information they share is made public to those outside of their network. It is also unclear how decision makers are currently utilizing the available information. Potential discrimination may result through employer’s access to publicly available pictures, videos, biographical information, or other shared information that often allows easy identification of applicant membership to a protected class. For the practice to progress in a positive direction, evidence for the validity and job-relevance of information obtained from SNSs needs to be established. Organizational researchers and practitioners also need to promote awareness and attempt to create safeguards against the potential negative outcomes related to misuse of SNSs by employers.

Keywords

Personnel selection Legal issues Social networking sites Social media Discrimination Prescreening 

References

  1. ADA Amendments Act of 2008, Pub. L. 110–325 (September 25, 2008).Google Scholar
  2. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AERA.Google Scholar
  3. Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S. C. A.§12101 et seq. Google Scholar
  4. Arndt, R. (2007). Admissions officers poke around on Facebook. Brown Daily Herald. Retrieved 22 February 2008 from http://www.browndailyherald.com/campus-news/admission-officers-poke-around-facebook-1.1673468.
  5. Arthur, W., & Villado, A. (2008). The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 435–442.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Back, M. D., Stopfer, S. V., Gaddis, S., Schmukle, S. C., Egloff, B., & Gosling, S. D. (2010). Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science. Retrieved from doi: 10.1177/0956797609360756.
  7. Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94, 991–1013. doi: 10.1257/0002828042002561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history and scholarship. Journal of Computer Mediated Education, 13(1), article 11. Retrieved 5 March 2008 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html.
  9. Clark, A. S. (2006). Employers look at Facebook, too: Companies turn to online profiles to see what applicants are really like. CBS Evening News, Retrieved 25 February 2010 from http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/06/20/eveningnews/main1734920.shtml.
  10. Davison, H. K., Maraist, C. C., Bing, M. N., Papinchock, J., Southwell, M., & Tamanini, K. B. (2009). The accidental resume: Legal and practical issues of e-screening. Panel discussion conducted at the 2009 Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  11. Du, W. (2007). Job candidates get tripped up by Facebook: Many students learn the hard way that online image can limit opportunity. Retrieved 5 March 2008 from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20202935/print/1/displaymode/1098.
  12. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2008). Americans with Disabilities Act: Questions and answers. Retrieved 23 February 2010 from http://www.ada.gov/qandaeng.htm.
  13. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission C. S. C, Department of Labor, & Department of Justice. (1978). Uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. Federal Register, 43(166), 38295–38309.Google Scholar
  14. Facebook, Inc. (2011, February). Facebook: Press room. Retrieved 27 February 2011 from http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/press/info.php?statistics.
  15. Goodings, L., Locke, A., & Brown, S. D. (2007). Social networking technology: Place and identity in mediated communities. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 463–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gosling, S. D., Gaddis, S., & Vazire, S. (2008). First impressions from the environments that we create and inhabit. In J. Skowronski & N. Ambady (Eds.), First impressions (pp. 334–356). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  17. Grasmuck, S., Martin, J., & Zhao, S. (2009). Ethno-racial identity displays on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 158–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01498.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grasz, J. (2009). Forty-five percent of employers use social networking sites to research job candidates, CareerBuilder survey finds. CareerBuilder Press Releases. Retrieved 21 February 2010 from http://www.careerbuilder.com/share/aboutus/pressreleasesdetail.aspx?id=pr519&sd=8%2f19%2f2009&ed=12%2f31%2f2009&siteid=cbpr&sc_cmp1=cb_pr519_.
  19. Guion, R. M. (1998). Assessment by inventories and interviews. In Guion (Ed.), Assessment, measurement, and prediction for personnel decisions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Harvey, J. H., Town, J. P., & Yarkin, K. L. (1981). How fundamental is the “fundamental attribution error”? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 346–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holahan, C. (2008, August). Facebook: No. 1 Globally. BusinessWeek. Retrieved 22 February 2010 from http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/aug2008/tc20080812_853725.htm.
  22. Kramer, N. C., & Winter, S. (2008). Impression Management 2.0: The relationship of self-esteem, extraversion, self-efficacy and self-presentation within social networking sties. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods and Applications, 20, 106–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Peluchette, J., & Karl, K. (2010). Examining students’ intended image on Facebook: ‘What were they thinking?!’. Journal of Education for Business, 85, 30–37. doi: 10.1080/08832320903217606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ricker, A. (2009, June 18). City requires Facebook passwords from job applicants. Bozeman Daily Chronicle. Retrieved 21 February 2010 from http://bozemandailychronicle.com/articles/2009/06/19/news/10socialnetworking.txt.
  26. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  27. Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (2003). Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures (4th ed.). Bowling Green, OH: Author.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyRoosevelt UniversitySchaumburgUSA

Personalised recommendations