Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 265–279 | Cite as

Millennials’ (Lack of) Attitude Problem: An Empirical Examination of Generational Effects on Work Attitudes

Article

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to contribute to the sparse empirical literature on generational differences at work by examining (1) the effect of generation on work attitudes (e.g., job satisfaction, job security, and turnover intentions) and (2) how Millennials’ work attitudes differ from prior generations.

Design/Methodology/Approach

Data were collected from a diverse sample of U.S. employees (N = 115,044) obtained from 18 years of repeated administrations of the Kenexa WorkTrends™ employee opinion survey. The data were analyzed using a hierarchical age-period-cohort regression model which has been recommended for the analysis of generational effects using repeated cross-sectional data.

Findings

In general, work attitudes differed across generations, although effect sizes were relatively small and depended on the work attitude. Compared to Boomers and Gen Xers, Millennials reported higher levels of overall company and job satisfaction, satisfaction with job security, recognition, and career development and advancement, but reported similar levels of satisfaction with pay and benefits and the work itself, and turnover intentions.

Implications

While generational differences do exist, whether they warrant special programs for Millennials is debatable. The cost of tailoring an intervention to each generation should be weighed against the potential benefits of considering generational differences.

Originality/Value

To our knowledge, no study has empirically examined differences in work attitudes across five generations while controlling for the confounding effects of age and time period.

Keywords

Generational differences Millennials Gen Y Work attitudes WorkTrends HAPC 

References

  1. Baltes, P. B., Reese, H. W., & Lipsitt, L. P. (1980). Life-span developmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 65–110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we do now and where do we go next? Personality and Performance, 9, 9–30.Google Scholar
  3. Cassidy, J. J., & Berube, D. (2009, April). Understanding generational differences through measurement: Identifying trends and developing recommendations for Gen Y. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Society of Industrial Organizational Psychology, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, P., & Choi, Y. (2007). Generational differences in work values: A study of hospitality management. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 20, 595–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1982). An approach to the attribution of aging, period, and cohort effects. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 238–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, J. B., Pawlowski, S. D., & Houston, A. (2006). Work commitments of Baby Boomers and Gen-Xers in the IT profession: Generational differences or myth? Journal of Computer Information Systems, Spring, 43–49.Google Scholar
  8. Deal, J. J. (2007). Retiring the generation gap: How employees young and old can find common ground. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Dudley, C. M., Burnfield-Geimer, J., & Erdheim, J. (2009, April). Generational differences in federal government employee attitudes and perceptions. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Society of Industrial Organizational Psychology, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  10. Duncan, L. E., & Agronick, G. S. (1995). The intersection of life stage and social events: Personality and life outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 558–568.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Giancola, F. (2006). The generation gap: More myth than reality. Human Resource Planning, 29, 32–37.Google Scholar
  12. Golembiewski, R. T., Billingsley, K., & Yeager, S. (1976). Measuring change and persistence in human affairs: Types of change generated by OD designs. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 12, 133–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrison, D. A., Newman, D. A., & Roth, P. L. (2006). How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 305–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  15. Hulin, C. L., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Job attitudes: A theoretical and empirical review. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 255–276). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. B., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 376–407.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2000). Generation X and the public employee. Public Personnel Management, 29, 55–74.Google Scholar
  18. Kleinfield, N. R. (1996). A new and unnerving workplace. In The downsizing of America (pp. 37–76). New York: The New York Times Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Macky, K., Gardner, D., & Forsyth, S. (2008). Generational differences at work: Introduction and overview. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 857–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generations. In Essays on the sociology of knowledge (pp. 276–322). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.Google Scholar
  21. Mason, K. O., Mason, W. H., Winsborough, H. H., & Poole, K. (1973). Some methodological issues in cohort analysis of archival data. American Sociological Review, 38, 242–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Neumark, D., Polsky, D., & Hanson, D. (1999). Has job stability declined yet? New evidence for the 1990s. Journal of Labor Economics, 17, S29–S64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Noble, S. M., & Schewe, C. D. (2003). Cohort segmentation: An exploration of its validity. Journal of Business Research, 56, 979–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., & Congdon, R. (2007). HLM (Version 6.04) [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  26. Ryder, N. B. (1965). The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review, 30, 843–861.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Safer, M. (2007). 60 Minutes: The “Millennials” are coming [television broadcast]. New York: CBS Corporation.Google Scholar
  28. Smola, K. W., & Sutton, C. D. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 363–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. New York, NY: William Morrow & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  30. Sverke, M., Hellgren, J., & Naswall, K. (2002). No security: A meta-analysis and review of job insecurity and its consequences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7, 242–264.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46, 259–293.Google Scholar
  32. The 500 Greatest Songs of All Time. (2004). Rolling stone. Retrieved July 31, 2009, from http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/500songs.
  33. Townshend, P. (1965a). My generation [recorded by The Who]. On my generation [record]. UK: Brunswick Studio.Google Scholar
  34. Townshend, P. (1965b). My generation [recorded by Green Day]. On Kerplunk! [CD]. Berkeley, CA: Lookout! Records. (1992).Google Scholar
  35. Townshend, P. (1965c). My generation [recorded by Hillary Duff]. On Hillary Duff [CD]. Burbank, CA: Hollywood Records (2004).Google Scholar
  36. Trunk, P. (2007). What Gen Y really wants. Retrieved July 26, 2009, from Time Magazine, http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1640395,00.html.
  37. Twenge, J. M. (2000). The age of anxiety? Birth cohort change in anxiety and neuroticism, 1952–1993. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1007–1021.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Twenge, J. M. (2001). Birth cohort changes in extraversion: A cross-temporal meta-analysis, 1966–1993. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 735–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2001). Age and birth cohort differences in self-esteem: A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 321–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Twenge, J. M., & Im, C. (2007). Changes in the need for social approval, 1958–2001. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Twenge, J. M., Konrath, S., Foster, J. D., Campbell, W. K., & Bushman, B. J. (2008). Egos inflating over time: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality, 76, 875–902.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Twenge, J. M., Zhang, L., & Im, C. (2004). It’s beyond my control: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of increasing externality in locus of control, 1960–2002. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 308–319.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (n.d.). Total mass layoff events. Retrieved July 31, 2009, from http://www.bls.gov/mls/home.htm.
  44. Yang, Y., & Land, K. C. (2006). A mixed models approach to the age-period-cohort analysis of repeated cross-section surveys, with an application to data on trends in verbal test scores. Sociological Methodology, 36, 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yang, Y., & Land, K. C. (2008). Age-period-cohort analysis of repeated cross-section surveys: Fixed or random effects? Sociological Methods Research, 36, 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kenexa Research InstituteMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations