Skip to main content

Leadership and Organizational Culture: Linking CEO Characteristics to Cultural Values

Journal of Business and Psychology volume 24, pages 123–137 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to empirically examine organizational culture theorists’ assertions about the linkages between leadership and the cultures that emerge in the organizations they lead. Specific hypotheses were developed and tested regarding relationships between chief executive officers’ (CEO’s) personality traits, and the cultural values that are shared among their organization’s members.

Design/Methodology/Approach

Thirty-two CEOs completed measures of the Big-Five personality traits and personal values. A total of 467 employees across the 32 organizations completed a competing values measure of organizational culture.

Findings

Results indicate support for several hypothesized relationships between CEO personality and cultural values. Exploratory analyses indicated that several CEO personal values were related to culture values.

Implications

Organizations need to seriously consider the “fit” between the current or desired organizational culture and CEO characteristics. Organizations attempting to change fundamental aspects of its functioning may need significant behavioral—or personnel—changes at the top of the organization in order to achieve those changes.

Originality/Value

This is the first empirical study to establish a link between specific CEO characteristics and the cultural values of their organizations. This study provides evidence that CEO characteristics are felt throughout the organization by impacting the norms that sanction or discourage member behavior and decision making, and the patterns of behavior and interaction among members.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern, growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apter, D. E. (1964). Introduction: Ideology and discontent. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 153–192). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, H. (1996). Strengths and limitations of ipsative measurement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377–391. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartram, D. (1996). The relationship between ipsatized and normative measures of personality. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. (1986). Leaders and visions: Orchestrating the corporate culture. In M. A. Berman (Ed.), Corporate culture and change. New York: The Conference Board Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders. Harper & Row, Pub: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new developments (pp. 349–381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cable, D. M., & Edwards, J. R. (2004). Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 822–834. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.822.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K. S., Quinn, R. E., Degraff, J., & Thakor, A. (2007). Competing values leadership: Creating value in organizations. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1943). Fluctuation of sentiments and attitudes as a measure of character integration and temperament. The American Journal of Psychology, 56, 559–594. doi:10.2307/1417504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, R. A., & Lafferty, J. C. (1987). The organizational culture inventory. Plymouth, MI: Human Synergistics Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., Jr, & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. M. (1984). Managing corporate culture. New York: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R. (1990). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1991). Organizational culture and organizational development: A competing values approach. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 5, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donahue, K. B. (2001). How to ruin a merger: Five people-management pitfalls to avoid. Harvard Management Update, 6(9), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1990). Biological dimensions of personality. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 244–276). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giberson, T. R., Resick, C. J., & Dickson, M. W. (2005). Embedding leader characteristics: An examination of homogeneity of personality and values in organizations. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 1002–1010. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.1002.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1997). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7). The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (2000). International Personality Item Pool. [On-Line]. Available: http://www.ipip.org, May 2000.

  • Gough, H. G. (1987). California psychology inventory administrator’s guide. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, W. G., Habashi, M. M., Sheese, B. E., & Tobin, R. M. (2007). Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person × situation perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 565–582. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.565.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanges, P. J., Lord, R. G., & Dickson, M. W. (2000). An information processing perspective on leadership and culture: A case for connectionist architecture. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 133–161. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1995). Hogan personality inventory manual. Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1996). Motives. values, and preferences inventory manual. Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Cable, D. M. (1997). Applicant personality, organizational culture, and organizational attraction. Personnel Psychology, 50, 359–393. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00912.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The big five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52, 621–652. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00174.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 211–236. doi:10.1177/109442810033001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K. J., Lim, B., Saltz, J. L., & Mayer, D. M. (2004). How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 952–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, C. (1942). Myths and rituals: A general theory. The Harvard Theological Review, 35, 45–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and value orientations in the theory of action. In T. Parsons & E. Shils (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action (pp. 388–433). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P., & Heskitt, J. L. (1992). Corporate culture and performance. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebreton, J. M. & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A. (1991). The motivation sequence, the motivation hub, and the motivation core. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 288–299. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90023-M.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, M. R. (1980). Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 226–251.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51–87). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, A. W. (2004). Psychometric problems and issues involved with creating and using ipsative measures for selection. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 531–552. doi:10.1348/0963179042596504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meglino, B. M., & Ravlin, E. C. (1998). Individual values in organizations: Concepts, controversies, and research. Journal of Management, 24, 351–389. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80065-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Droge, C. (1986). Psychological and traditional determinants of structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 539–560. doi:10.2307/2392963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Kets de Vries, M. F. R., & Toulouse, J. M. (1982). Top executive locus of control and its relationship to strategy-making, structure, and environment. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 237–253. doi:10.2307/255988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1995). The big five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resources management. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 13, pp. 153–200). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (1996). Culture as social control: Corporations, cults and commitment. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 18, pp. 157–200). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487–516. doi:10.2307/256404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R., Smith, D. B., Martorana, P., & Owens, P. (2003). The impact of chief executive officer personality on top management team dynamics: One mechanism by which leadership affects organizational performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 795–808. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.795.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. E., & Kimberly, J. R. (1984). Paradox, planning, and perseverance: Guidelines for managerial practice. In J. R. Kimberly & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Managing organizational transitions (pp. 295–313). Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. E., & McGrath, M. R. (1984). The transformation of organizational culture: A competing values perspective. Paper presented at the Conference of Organizational Culture and Meaning of Life in the Workplace, Vancouver.

  • Ravlin, E. C., & Meglino, B. M. (1987). Effects of values on perceptions and decision making: A study of alternative work values measurers. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 666–673. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.4.666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rentsch, J. R. (1990). Climate and culture: Interaction and qualitative differences in organizational meanings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 668–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1990). Assessing organizational culture: The case for multiple methods. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 153–192). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saville, P., & Willson, E. (1991). The reliability and validity of normative and ipsative approaches in the measurement of personality. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 219–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437–453. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00609.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B., Goldstein, H. W., & Smith, D. B. (1995). The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psychology, 48, 747–773. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01780.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B., & Smith, D. B. (2004). Personality and organizational culture. In B. Schneider & D. B. Smith (Eds.), Personality and organization (pp. 347–369). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550–562. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. Harper & Row, Pub: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. B., Dickson, M. W., Grojean, M., & Hanges, P. J. (2002). Development and validation of a new measure of personal values. Working Paper. Houston, TX: Rice University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Have, S., Ten Have, W., Stevens, F., & van der Elst, M. (2003). Key management models: What they are and when you use them. Upper Saddlewood River, NJ: FT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, R. M., Graziano, W. G., Vanman, E., & Tassinary, L. (2000). Personality, emotional experience, and efforts to control emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 656–669.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trice, H. M., & Beyer, J. M. (1993). The cultures of work organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. S., Zhang, Z.-X., Want, H., Xin, K. R., & Wu, J. B. (2006). Unpacking the relationship between CEO leadership behavior and organizational culture. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 113–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vianen, A. E. M. (2000). Person-organization fit: The match between newcomers’ and recruiters’ preferences for organizational cultures. Personnel Psychology, 53, 113–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1997). Extraversion and its positive emotional core. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 767–793). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. K. (1968). Personality and organizational behavior studies. In B. P. Indik & F. K. Berrien (Eds.), People, groups, and organizations (pp. 154–171). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zammuto, R. F., & Krakower, J. Y. (1991). Quantitative and qualitative studies of organizational culture. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 5, 83–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zammuto, R. F., & O’Connor, E. J. (1992). Gaining advanced manufacturing technologies’ benefits: The roles of organizational design and culture. Academy of Management Review, 17, 701–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Oakland University, 495 C Pawley Hall, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA

    Tomas R. Giberson

  2. Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Christian J. Resick

  3. Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA

    Marcus W. Dickson & Malissa A. Clark

  4. Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA

    Jacqueline K. Mitchelson

  5. Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA

    Kenneth R. Randall

Authors
  1. Tomas R. Giberson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian J. Resick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marcus W. Dickson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jacqueline K. Mitchelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kenneth R. Randall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Malissa A. Clark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomas R. Giberson.

Additional information

Received and reviewed by former editor, George Neuman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giberson, T.R., Resick, C.J., Dickson, M.W. et al. Leadership and Organizational Culture: Linking CEO Characteristics to Cultural Values. J Bus Psychol 24, 123–137 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9109-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9109-1

Keywords

  • CEO characteristics
  • Organizational culture
  • Leadership
  • ASA theory
  • Multi-level research