Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to explore the relationships between perceived coworker loafing and counterproductive work behaviors toward the organization (CWB-O) and toward the coworkers (CWB-I).
Design/Methodology/Approach
Data were collected from 184 supervisor–employee pairs from multiple sources (i.e., self-rated and supervisor-rated). Structural equation modeling (SEM) analyses were conducted to test our hypotheses.
Findings
The results of SEM showed that perceived loafing was positively related to CWB-O (self-rated) and CWB-I (self-rated and supervisor-rated). Moreover, a revenge motive toward the organization fully mediated the relationship between perceived loafing and CWB-O, whereas a revenge motive toward coworkers fully mediated the relationship between perceived loafing and CWB-I.
Implications
This study advances our understanding as to how and why perceived coworker loafing increases employees’ CWB-I and CWB-O. Our investigation also highlights the important cognitive mediator: revenge motive in the perceived loafing–CWB linkage.
Originality/Value
This is one of the first studies which examines the relationships between perceived coworker loafing and two facets of CWB, and investigates a cognitive mediator (i.e., a revenge motive) that underlines the perceived loafing–CWB linkage. In addition, we respond to Bennett and Robinson’s (J Appl Psychol 85:349–360, 2003) call to test the nomological network of CWB in a collectivist culture (i.e., Taiwan).
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The term “sucker” is informally used to describe someone who is easily deceived.
As 81 supervisors rated more than one employee, this raises the issue of data non-independence on supervisor-rated CWB (e.g., rater effects). Similarly, employee self-rated CWB could be influenced by the group effect (e.g., working within the same work context or for the same boss may have led to the similar levels of self-rated CWB). Therefore, we calculated the ICC(1) and r wg values for both supervisor-rated CWB-I (ICC[1] = .15, mean r wg = .95) and CWB-O (ICC[1] = .18, mean r wg = .98), and employee self-rated CWB-I (ICC[1] = .22, mean r wg = .96) and CWB-O (ICC[1] = .17, mean r wg = .97). These values suggested that the potential for non-independence problems in terms of supervisor-rated and self-rated CWB did exist. Thus, we conducted HLM to control the non-independence problem (i.e., rater effects and group effects) and then tested our model again. According to Hofmann and Gavin’s (1998) suggestions, we used the grand-mean centering method to center the Level-1 predictors and control for the Level-2 rater or group effects. The HLM results showed similar findings to the SEM results. Hence, the non-independence problem did not adversely influence our findings.
Although it is useful to control negative affectivity (NA) in order to reduce the possibility of common method variances, Podsakoff et al. (2003) also suggest that controlling for NA might also partial out the meaningful variances between NA and other theoretically related variables. As such, we performed additional analyses that excluded NA from our final models. The results remained identical to our original findings.
Those studies using different rating scale (e.g., five-point Likert scale) or different anchors (e.g., very agree to very disagree) were excluded in our comparison.
References
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411.
Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2001). How employees respond to personal offense: The effects of blame attribution, victim status, and offender status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 52–59. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.52.
Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 421–458. doi:10.2307/2393203.
Barclay, L. J., Skarlicki, D. P., & Pugh, S. D. (2005). Exploring the role of emotions in injustice perceptions and retaliation. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 629–643. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.629.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
Baron, R. A., & Neuman, J. H. (1996). Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence on their relative frequency and potential causes. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 161–173. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:3<161::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-Q.
Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 349–360. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349.
Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2003). The past, present, and future of workplace deviance research. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (pp. 247–281). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS: Structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
Berry, C. M., Ones, D. S., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 410–424. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.410.
Beugre, C. D. (2005). Reacting aggressively to injustice at work: A cognitive stage model. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20, 291–301. doi:10.1007/s10869-005-8265-1.
Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations (Vol. 1, pp. 43–55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (1996). Beyond distrust: Getting even and the need for revenge. In R. M. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust and organizations (pp. 246–260). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (2001). A passion for justice: The rationality and mortality of revenge. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the work place: From theory to practice (Vol. 2, pp. 197–208). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bies, R. J., Tripp, T. M., & Kramer, R. M. (1997). At the breaking point: Cognitive and social dynamics of revenge in organizations. In R. A. Giacalone & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in organizations (pp. 18–36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
Burk-Lee, V., & Spector, P. E. (2006). The social stressors-counterproductive work behaviors link: Are conflicts with supervisors and coworkers the same? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 145–156. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.11.2.145.
Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The Convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 875–884. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.875.
Comer, D. R. (1995). A model of social loafing in real work group. Human Relations, 48, 430–452. doi:10.1177/001872679504800603.
Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1241–1255. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1241.
Diefendorff, J. M., & Mehta, K. (2007). The relations of motivational traits with workplace deviance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 967–977. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.967.
Eisenberger, R., Lynch, P., Aselage, J., & Rohdieck, S. (2004). Who takes the most revenge? Individual differences in negative reciprocity norm endorsement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 787–799. doi:10.1177/0146167204264047.
Felps, W., Mitchell, T. R., & Byington, E. (2006). How, when, and why bad apples spoil the barrel: Negative group members and dysfunctional groups. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 181–230. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27005-9.
Fox, S., & Spector, P. E. (1999). A model of work frustration–aggression. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 915–931. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199911)20:6<915::AID-JOB918>3.0.CO;2-6.
Fox, S., Spector, P. E., Goh, A., & Bruursema, K. (2007). Does your coworker know what you’re doing? Convergence of self- and peer-reports of counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of Stress Management, 14, 41–60. doi:10.1037/1072-5245.14.1.41.
Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Miles, D. (2001). Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 291–309. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1803.
Glomb, T. M., & Liao, H. (2003). Interpersonal aggression in work groups: Social influences, reciprocal and individual effects. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 486–496.
Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24, 623–641.
Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hogan, J., & Hogan, R. (1989). How to measure employee reliability. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 273–279. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.2.273.
Jones, D. A. (2004). Toward a better understanding of fairness in the workplace: Attitude strength, predictive asymmetry, and the revenge motive. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary, Canada.
Jones, D. A. (2009). Getting even with one’s supervisor and one’s organization: Relationships among types of injustice, desires for revenge, and counterproductive work behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, (in press). doi:10.1002/job.563.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1999). LISREL: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Judge, T. A., Scott, B. A., & Ilies, R. (2006). Hostility, job attitudes, and workplace deviance: Test of a multilevel model. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 126–138. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.126.
Kidwell, R. E., & Bennett, N. (1993). Employee propensity to withhold effort: A conceptual model to intersect three avenues of research. Academy of Management Review, 18, 429–456. doi:10.2307/258904.
Korsgaard, M. A., & Roberson, L. (1995). Procedural justice in performance evaluation: The role of instrumental and non-instrumental voice in performance appraisal discussions. Journal of Management, 21, 657–669. doi:10.1177/014920639502100404.
Kwok, C. K., Au, W. T., & Ho, J. C. (2005). Normative controls and self-reported counterproductive behaviors in the workplace in China. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 456–475. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00220.x.
Lau, C. S., Au, W. T., & Ho, M. C. (2003). A qualitative and quantitative review of antecedents of counterproductive behavior in organizations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18, 73–99. doi:10.1023/A:1025035004930.
Liao, H., Joshi, A., & Chuang, A. (2004). Sticking out like a sore thumb: Employee dissimilarity and deviance at work. Personnel Psychology, 57, 969–1000. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00012.x.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Jaworski, R. A., & Bennett, N. (2004). Social loafing: A field investigation. Journal of Management, 30, 285–304. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2003.02.002.
Martinko, M. J., Gundlach, M. J., & Doglas, S. C. (2002). Toward an integrative theory of counterproductive workplace behavior: A causal reasoning perspective. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 36–50. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00192.
Mount, M., Ilies, R., & Johnson, E. (2006). Relationship of personality traits and counterproductive work behaviors: The mediating effects of job satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 59, 591–622. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00048.x.
Mulvey, P. W., & Klein, H. J. (1998). The impact of perceived loafing and collective efficacy in group goal processes and group performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 62–87. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2753.
O’Driscoll, M. P., Pierce, J. L., & Coghlan, A. (2006). The psychological ownership: Work environment structure, organizational commitment, and citizenship behavior. Group & Organization Management, 31, 388–416. doi:10.1177/1059601104273066.
Penney, L. M., & Spector, P. E. (2005). Job stress, incivility, and counterproductive work behavior (CWB): The moderating role of negative affectivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 777–796. doi:10.1002/job.336.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavior research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544. doi:10.1177/014920638601200408.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.
Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555–572. doi:10.2307/256693.
Robinson, S. L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (1998). Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the antisocial behavior of employees. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 658–672. doi:10.2307/256963.
Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 66–80. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.66.
Sackett, P. R. (2002). The structure of counterproductive behaviors: Dimensionality and relationships with facets of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 5–11. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00189.
Schmitt, N., Cortina, J. M., Ingerick, M. J., & Wiechmann, D. (2003). Personnel selection and employee performance. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 77–105). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Schwab, D. P. (2005). Research methods for organizational studies (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 434–443. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.3.434.
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sommers, J. A., Schell, T. L., & Vodanovich, S. J. (2002). Developing a measure of individual differences in organizational revenge. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 207–222. doi:10.1023/A:1019633531675.
Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221–232. doi:10.1177/1094428105284955.
Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior (CWB) and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). Human Resource Management Review, 12, 269–292. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00049-9.
Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2003). Reducing subjectivity in the assessment of the job environment: Development of the Factual Autonomy Scale (FAS). Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 417–432. doi:10.1002/job.199.
Thau, S., Aquino, K., & Wittek, R. (2007). An extension of uncertainty management theory to the self: The relationship between justice, social comparison orientation, and antisocial work behaviors. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 250–258. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.250.
Venkataramani, V., & Dalal, R. S. (2007). Who helps and harms who? Relational antecedents of interpersonal helping and harming in organizations. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 952–966. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.952.
Vigoda, E. (2002). Stress-related aftermaths to workplace politics: The relationship among politics, job distress, and aggressive behavior in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 571–591. doi:10.1002/job.160.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14, 490–495. doi:10.2307/258554.
Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806–838. doi:10.1177/0011000006288127.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Received and reviewed by former editor, George Neuman.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hung, TK., Chi, NW. & Lu, WL. Exploring the Relationships Between Perceived Coworker Loafing and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Mediating Role of a Revenge Motive. J Bus Psychol 24, 257–270 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9104-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9104-6