Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effects of a Diversity Learning Experience on Positive and Negative Diversity Perceptions

  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a pretest-posttest research paradigm, we administered the Reaction-To-Diversity Inventory to students enrolled in a workplace diversity course at a regional Midwestern university. Our results show that the diversity experience produced an increase in the number of positive and negative perceptions students associated with workplace diversity. Gender also played a significant role in determining diversity perceptions. We discuss the implications of our findings for the design, implementation, and evaluation of diversity learning experiences in academic and corporate settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arvey, R. D., & Cole, D. A. (1989). Evaluating change due to training. In I. Goldstein (Ed.), Training and development in work organizations (pp. 89–117). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2000). AACU survey on diversity requirements: Overview of survey data. Retrieved from http://www.aacu-edu.org/divsurvey/irvineoverview.cfm. Accessed 1 Apr 2007.

  • Bartunek, J. M., Gordon, J. R., & Weathersby, R. P. (1983). Developing “complicated” understanding in administrators. Academy of Management Review, 8(2), 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaton, A. M., & Tougas, F. (2001). Reactions to affirmative action: Group membership and social justice. Social Justice Research, 14(1), 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brief, A. P., Umphress, E. E., Dietz, J., Burrows, J. W., Butz, R. M., & Scholten, L. (2005). Community matters: Realistic group conflict theory and the impact of diversity. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 830–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrell, M. R., & Mann, E. E. (1995). Defining workforce diversity in public sector organizations. Public Personnel Management, 24(1), 99–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrell, M. R., Mann, E. E., & Sigler, H. (2006). Defining workforce diversity programs and practices in organizations: A longitudinal study. Labor Law Journal, 57(1), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatman, J., Polzer, J., Barsade, S., & Neale, M. (1998). Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 749–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau, P. Y. K. (1997). Reexamining a model for evaluating information center success using a structural equation modeling approach. Decision Sciences, 28(2), 309–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherniss, C., & Goleman, D. (Eds.). (2001). The emotionally intelligent workplace: How to select for, measure, and improve emotional intelligence in individuals, groups, and organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comer, D. R., & Soliman, C. E. (1996). Organizational efforts to manage diversity: Do they really work? Journal of Managerial Issues, 8, 470–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T. (2001). Creating the multicultural organization: A strategy for capturing the power of diversity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T., & Blake, S. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness. Academy of Management Executive, 5(3), 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W. (1991). Problems of direction in socially shared cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 384–397). Washington, D.C.: APA Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Meuse, K. P., & Hostager, T. J. (2001). Developing an instrument for measuring attitudes toward and perceptions of workplace diversity: An initial report. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(1), 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, F. M. (2003). How gender counts when couples count their money. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 48(7–8), 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Early, P. C., & Peterson, R. S. (2004). The elusive cultural chameleon: Cultural intelligence as a new approach to intercultural training for the global manager. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3, 100–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbedour, S., Bastien, D. T., & Center, B. A. (1997). Identity formation in the shadow of conflict: Projective drawings by Palestinian and Israeli Arab children from the West Bank and Gaza. Journal of Peace Research, 34(2), 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1994). Diverse approaches to managing diversity. Human Resource Management, 33, 79–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esen, E. (2005). 2005 workplace diversity practices: Survey report. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen, M., & Palmer, A. T. (1994, January 31). White, male, and worried. Business Week, 50–55.

  • Gandz, J. (2001). A business case for diversity. Retrieved from http://www.equalopportunity.on.ca/eng_g/documents/BusCase.html. Accessed 1 Apr 2007.

  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, F. (2003). Diversity’s business case doesn’t add up. Workforce, 82(4), 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, K. D. (2001). Level III training evaluation: Considerations for today’s organizations. Performance Improvement Journal, 40(5), 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, D. R. (1970). The semantic differential and attitude research. In G. F. Summers (Ed.), Attitude measurement (pp. 235–253). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hostager, T. J., & De Meuse, K. P. (2002). Assessing the complexity of diversity perceptions: Breadth, depth, and balance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(2), 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, E. E. (2004). The diversity scorecard. New York: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. E. (1992). Team composition in organizations. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 138–173). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. E., Joshi, A., & Erhardt, N. L. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29(6), 801–830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidder, D. L., Lankau, M. J., Chrobot-Mason, D., Mollica, K. A., & Friedman, R. A. (2004). Backlash toward diversity initiatives: Examining the impact of diversity program justification, personal and group outcomes. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 15, 77–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. R., & Pate, A. N. (2002). Individual differences in judgmental tendencies derived from first impressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(1), 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, T., Bezrukova, K., Ely, R., Jackson, S., Joshi, A., Jehn, K., et al. (2003). The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network. Human Resource Management, 42(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E. E., Markel, K. S., & McHugh, P. P. (2003). Increasing diversity as an HRM strategy. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16, 328–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kravitz, D. A., & Klineberg, S. L. (2000). Reactions to two versions of affirmative action among Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 597–611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kravitz, D. A., & Platania, J. (1993). Attitudes and beliefs about affirmative action: Effects of target and of respondent sex and ethnicity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), 928–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. (1998). Gender-related individual difference and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the “People-Things” dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 996–1009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. A. (2005). Gender, nature, and nurture (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, B. L., Murry, W. D., & Wimbush, J. C. (1998). Perceptions of workplace affirmative action plans: A psychological perspective. Group & Organization Management, 23(1), 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannix, E., & Neale, M. A. (2005). What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(2), 31–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values to fit indexes and dangers of overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martineau, J. W., & Preskill, H. (2002). Evaluating the impact of organizational development interventions. In J. Waclawski & A. H. Church (Eds.), Organization development: A data-driven approach to organizational change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, C., Wright, M., & Harris, M. E. (2000). Diversity workshops on campus: A survey of current practice at U.S. colleges and universities. College Student Journal, 34(1), 100–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCuiston, V. E., & Wooldridge, B. R. (2004). Leading the diverse workforce: Profit, prospects, and progress. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25, 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, P., Lobel, S., & Cox, T. (1996). Ethnic diversity and creativity in small groups. Small Group Research, 27(2), 248–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan-Capehart, A. (2005). A configurational framework for diversity: Socialization and culture. Personnel Review, 34(4), 488–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, F. A., & Katz, J. H. (2002). The inclusion breakthrough: Unleashing the real power of diversity. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 402–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minehan, M. (2004). Changing demography and recruitment. Retrieved from http://www.diversityresources.com/rc21d/changedem.html. Accessed 1 Apr 2007.

  • Mobley, M., & Payne, T. (1992). Backlash! The challenge to diversity training. Training & Development, 46(2), 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mor Barak, M. E., Cherin, D. A., & Berkman, S. (1998). Organizational and personal dimensions in diversity climate. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 34, 82–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Survey of Voters. (1998). Overview report. Retrieved from http://www.diversityweb.org/research_and_trends/research_evaluation_impact/campus_community_connections/national_poll.cfm. Accessed 3 Apr 2008.

  • Nemeth, C. J., & Kwan, J. L. (1987). Minority influence, divergent thinking and detection of correct solutions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17(9), 788–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth, C., Mosier, K., & Chiles, C. (1992). When convergent thought improves performance: Majority vs. minority influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(2), 139–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth, C. J., & Wachtler, J. (1983). Creative problem solving as a result of majority vs. minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13(1), 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, C. P., Baltes, B. B., & Christensen, N. D. (1997). Support for affirmative action, justice perceptions, and work attitudes: A study of gender and racial-ethnic group differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 376–389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, D. L. (Ed.). (2003). Handbook of diversity management. New York: University Press of American, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst, T. M. (2003). Changing attitudes over time: Assessing the effectiveness of a workplace diversity course. Teaching of Psychology, 30(3), 236–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricaud, J. S. (2006). Auditing cultural diversity. Internal Auditor, 63(6), 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, O. (2000). Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 164–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberson, L., Kulik, C. T., & Pepper, M. B. (2003). Using needs assessment to resolve controversies in diversity training design. Group & Organization Management, 28(1), 148–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockdale, M. S., & Crosby, F. J. (Eds.). (2004). The psychology and management of workplace diversity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, J. P., & Connerley, M. L. (2003). Demographics personality, contact, and universal-diverse orientation: An exploratory examination. Human Resource Management, 42(2), 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streufert, S., & Swezey, R. W. (1986). Complexity, managers and organizations. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, J. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. A. (2004). Diversity as strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(9), 98–108.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. R., Ely, R. J., Meyerson, D., & Thomas, D. A. (2002). Harvard Business Review on managing diversity. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. (2000). When the topic is race white male denial. Diversity Factor, 8(3), 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 549–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2004). U.S. interim projections by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/usinterimproj. Accessed 3 Apr 2008.

  • van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008–1022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, W., Kumar, K., & Michaelsen, L. (1993). Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 590–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 77–140). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winquist, L. A., Mohr, C. D., & Kenny, D. A. (1998). The female positivity effect in the perception of others. Journal of Research in Personality, 32(3), 370–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, WI, USA

    Todd J. Hostager

  2. Lominger International: A Korn/Ferry Company, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    Kenneth P. De Meuse

Authors
  1. Todd J. Hostager
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kenneth P. De Meuse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Todd J. Hostager.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hostager, T.J., De Meuse, K.P. The Effects of a Diversity Learning Experience on Positive and Negative Diversity Perceptions. J Bus Psychol 23, 127–139 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-008-9085-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-008-9085-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation