Skip to main content
Log in

Leader responsiveness, equity sensitivity, and employee attitudes and behavior

  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the relationships between leader responsiveness to employee requests and employee attitudes and behaviors in a sample of managers and their subordinates. Additionally, the study investigated the moderating effect of an individual difference variable (equity sensitivity), on the relationships between leader responsiveness and employee attitudes and behaviors. Leader responsiveness related significantly with job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior. Furthermore, equity sensitivity moderated the relationships between leader responsiveness and job satisfaction. Entitleds reported lower job satisfaction when manager fulfillment of employee requests was low than did Benevolents, whereas differences were minimal when manager request fulfillment was high. Implications of the findings were discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams J. S., (1965). Inequity in social exchange Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 2: 267–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau P. M., (1964). Exchange and power in social life Wiley New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bing M. N., Burroughs S. M., (2001). The predictive and interactive effects of equity sensitivity in teamwork-oriented organizations Journal of Organizational Behavior 22: 271–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J., Cohen P., (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences Erlbaum Hillsdale, N.J

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger R., Huntington R., Hutchison S., Sowa D., (1986). Perceived organizational support Journal of Applied Psychology 71: 500–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger R., Stinglhamber F., Vandenberghe C., Sucharski I. L., Rhoades L., (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention Journal of Applied Psychology 87(3): 565–573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Folger R., Greenberg J., (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems In Rowland K., Ferris G., (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management Vol. 3. JAI Press Greenwich, Ct pp. 141–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner A. W., (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement American Sociological Review 25: 161–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg J., Westcott D. R., (1983). Indebtedness as a mediator or reactions to aid In Fisher J. D., Nadler A., DePaulo B. M., (Eds.), New directions in helping. Academic Press New York (pp. 85–122)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huseman R. C., Hatfield J. D., Miles E. W., (1985). Test for individual perceptions of job equity: Some preliminary findings Perceptual and Motor Skills 61: 1055–1064

    Google Scholar 

  • Huseman R. C., Hatfield J. D., Miles E. W., (1987). A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct Academy of Management Review 12: 222–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kickul J.,0 Lester S. W., (2001). Broken promises: Equity sensitivity as a moderator between psychological contract breach and employee attitudes and behavior Journal of Business and Psychology 16: 191–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King W. C. Jr., Miles E. W., (1994). The measurement of equity sensitivity Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 67: 133–142

    Google Scholar 

  • King W. C. Jr., Miles E. W., Day D. D., (1993). A test and refinement of the equity sensitivity construct Journal of Organizational Behavior 14: 301–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Kottke J. L., Sharafinski C. E., (1988). Measuring perceived supervisory and organizational support Educational and Psychological Measurement 48: 1075–1079

    Google Scholar 

  • Liden R. C., Sparrowe R. T., Wayne S. J., (1997). Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future In Ferris G. R., (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management . JAI Press Greenwich, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke E. A., (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction In Dunnette M. D., (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology Rand McNally Chicago (pp. 1297–1349)

    Google Scholar 

  • Manogram, P., & Conlon, E. J. (1993). A leader–member exchange approach to explaining organizational citizenship behaviors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta

  • Masterson S. S., Lewis K., Goldman B. M., Taylor M. S., (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships Academy of Management Journal 43(4): 738–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu J., Zajac D., (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment Psychological Bulletin 108: 171–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J. P., Allen N. J., (1984). Testing the “side-bet theory” of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations Journal of Applied Psychology 69: 372–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J. P., Allen N. J., (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research and application Sage Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles E. W., Hatfield J. D., Huseman R. C., (1989). The equity sensitivity construct: Potential implications for worker performance Journal of Management 15: 581–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles E. W., Hatfield J. D., Huseman R. C., (1994). Equity sensitivity and outcome importance Journal of Organizational Behavior 15: 585–596

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill B. S., Mone M. A., (1998). Investigating equity sensitivity as a moderator of relations between self-efficacy and workplace attitudes Journal of Applied Psychology 83: 805–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostroff C., (1992). The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational-level analysis Journal of Applied Psychology 77: 963–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades L., Eisenberger R., Armeli S., (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support Journal of Applied Psychology 86: 825–836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau D. M., (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 2: 121–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seashore S. E., Lawler E. E., Mirvis P., Cammann C., (Eds.) (1982). Observing and measuring organizational change: A guide to field practice Wiley New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore T. H., (2004). Equity sensitivity theory: Do we all want more than we deserve? Journal of Managerial Psychology 19: 722–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore L. M., Shore T. H., (1995). Perceived organizational support and organizational justice In Cropanzano R., Kacmar K. M., (Eds.), Organizational politics, justice, and support: Managing social climate at work Quorum Press Westport, CT 149–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith C. A., Organ D. W., Near J. P., (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents Journal of Applied Psychology 68: 653–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector P. E., (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes and consequences Sage Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone E. F., Hollenbeck J. R., (1989). Clarifying some controversial issues surrounding statistical procedures for detecting moderator variables: Empirical evidence and related matters Journal of Applied Psychology 74: 3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien M., Graen G. B., Scandura T. A., (2000). Implications of leader–member exchange (LMX) for strategic human resource management systems: Relationships as social capital for competitive advantage Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management 18: 137–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Vecchio R. P., (1981). An individual differences interpretation of the conflicting predictions generated by equity theory and expectancy theory Journal of Applied Psychology 66: 470–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne S. J., Shore L. M., Bommer W. H., Tetrick L. E., (2002). The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader–member exchange Journal of Applied Psychology 87(3): 590–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne S. J., Shore L. M., Liden R. C., (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader–member exchange: A social exchange perspective Academy of Management Journal 40(1): 82–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ted Shore.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shore, T., Sy, T. & Strauss, J. Leader responsiveness, equity sensitivity, and employee attitudes and behavior. J Bus Psychol 21, 227–241 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-006-9026-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-006-9026-5

Keywords

Navigation