Skip to main content
Log in

DRESSING TO IMPRESS: BELIEFS AND ATTITUDES REGARDING WORKPLACE ATTIRE

  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine individual differences in beliefs and attitudes regarding workplace attire including: the value placed on clothing, the impact of attire on workplace outcomes (e.g., promotions, raises), the effort and planning involved in dressing appropriately for work, how their clothing made them feel, and whether they used their attire to manage the impression of others in the workplace. Results from a sample of MBA students indicate that those who valued workplace attire used it to manage the impressions of others and believed that it positively impacts the way they feel about themselves and their workplace outcomes. Dressing to impress appeared to have particular utility for high self-monitors and those in management/executive positions. Women were found to be more interested in clothing and experienced more “appearance labor” when compared to men. Suggestions for future research are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A. 1995.Self-efficacy in changing societies.Cambridge University PressNew York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Bixler S., 1997. The new professional image: From business casual to the ultimate power look. Adams Media Avon, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Christman L., Branson D., 1990. Influence of physical disability and dress of female job applicants on interviewers. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 8(3):51–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhary U., 1988. Instructor’s attire as a biasing factor in students’ ratings of an instructor. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 6(2):17–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis L., Lennon S., 1985. Self-monitoring, fashion opinion leadership, and attitudes toward clothing. In Solomon M., (Ed.) Psychology of fashion Heath Lexington, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Day D., Unckless A., Schleicher D., Hiller N., 2002. Self-monitoring personality at work: A meta-analytic investigation of construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology 87(2):390–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drake M., Ford I., 1979. Adolescent clothing and adjustment. Home Economics Research Journal 7:234–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Fandt P., Ferris G., 1990. The management of information and impressions: When employees behave opportunistically. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 45:140–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske S., Taylor S., 1984. Social cognition. Addison-Wesley Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe S. M., Drake M. F., Cox C. E., 1985. Influence of applicant’s dress on interviewer’s selection decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology 70(2):374–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frith H., Gleeson K., 2004. Clothing and embodiment: Men managing body image and appearance. Psychology of Men and Masculinity 5(1):40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galin A., Benoliel B., 1990. Does the way you dress affect your performance rating? Personnel 67:49–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad W., Snyder M., 1985. To carve nature at its joints: On the existence of discrete classes in personality. Psychological Review 92:317–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson L., Balkwell C., 1990. Effects of harmony between personal and apparel coloring on perceptions of a woman’s employment potential. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 8(2):23–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman E., 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday Garden City, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling R., Standen R., 1998. Doctors’ dress. British Journal of Psychiatry 172:188–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goudge B., Littrell M., 1989. Attributions for job acquisition: Job skills, dress, and luck of female job applicants. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 7(4):19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graen G., Scandura T., 1987. Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In Cummings L. L., Staw B., (Eds.) Research in organizational behavior 9 JAI Press Greenwich, CT, 175–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy A., Banim M., 2000. Personal collections: Women’s clothing use and identity. Journal of Gender Studies 9(3):313–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman E., Adcock W., 1978. An examination of innovative communicators, opinion leaders, and innovators for men’s fashion apparel. In Hunt H. K., (Ed.) Advances in consumer research Association for Consumer Research Ann Arbor, MI, 303–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins M., Atkins V., 1990. Perceptions of acceptable dress by corporate and non-corporate recruiters. Journal of Human Behavior and Learning 7(1):38–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz D., Kahn R., 1978. The social psychology of organizations. (2nd edn.). Wiley New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff M., Day D., 1994. Do chameleons get ahead? The effects of self-monitoring on managerial careers. Academy of Management Journal 37:1047–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon Y., 1994. The influence of appropriateness of dress and gender on the self-perception of occupational attributes. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 12(3):33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leary M., Kowalski R., 1990. Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin 107: 34–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malloy J., 1988. John T. Molloy’s new dress for success. Warner New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Menahem S., Shvartzman P., 1998. Is our appearance important to our patients? Family Practice 15(5):391–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller J., Cardy R., 2003. Self-monitoring and performance appraisal: Rating outcomes in project teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior 21:609–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minshall B., Winakor G., Sinney J., 1982. Fashion preferences of males and females, risk perceived, and temporal quality of styles. Home Economics Research Journal 10(4):369–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Morem S., 1997. How to gain the professional edge: Achieve the personal and professional image you want. Better Books Dudley, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris T., Gorham J., Cohen S., Huffman D., 1996. Fashion in the classroom: Effects of attire on student perceptions of instructors in college classes. Communication Education 45(2):135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musa K., Roach M., 1973. Adolescent appearance and self concept. Adolescence 8:385–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafaeli A., Dutton J., 1997. Navigating by attire: The use of dress by administrative employees. Academy of Management Journal 40(1):19–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafaeli A., Pratt M., 1993. Tailed meanings: On the meaning and impact of organizational dress. Academy of Management Review 18:32–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roach D., 1997. Effects of graduate teaching assistant attire on student learning, misbehaviors, and ratings of instruction. Communication Quarterly 45(3):125–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld P., Giacalone R., Riordan C., 2001. Impression management: Building and enhancing reputations at work. International Thompson Business Press New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rucker M., Anderson E., Kangas A., 1999. Clothing, power and the workplace. In Johnson K., Lennon S., (Eds.) Appearance and power: Dress, body, culture Berg New York, USA, 59–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabath A., 2000. Beyond business casual: What to wear to work to get ahead. Career Press Franklin Lakes, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz V., 2000 Your executive image: The art of self-packaging for men and women. Adams Media Avon, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Shim S., Kostiopulos A., Knoll D., 1991. Body cathesis, clothing attitude, and their relation to clothing and shopping behavior among male consumers. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 9(3):35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder M., 1987. Public appearances/private realities: The psychology of self-monitoring. W.H. Freeman & Co. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder M., 1989. Selling images versus selling products: Motivational foundations of consumer attitudes and behavior. Advances in Consumer Research 16:306–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder M., Copeland J., 1989. Self-monitoring processes in organizational settings. In Giacalone R., Rosenfeld P., (Eds.) Impression management in the organization Lawrence Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ, 7–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon M., Schopler J., 1982. Self-consciousness and clothing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 8(3):508–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor S., Crocker J., 1981. Schematic bases of social information processing. In Higgins E. T., Herman C., Zanna M., (Eds.) Social cognition: The Ontario symposium, 1Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ, 89–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi J., Melburg V., 1984. Impression management and influence in the organization. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 3: 31–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Trice H., Beyer J., 1993. The culture of work organizations. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseelon E., 1992. Self-presentation through appearance: A manipulative vs. dramaturgical approach. Symbolic Interaction 15(4):501–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnley W., Bolino M., 2001. Achieving desired images while avoiding undesired images: Exploring the role of self-monitoring in impression management. Journal of Applied Psychology 86(2):351–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joy V. Peluchette.

Additional information

The authors wish to thank the University of Southern Indiana for its sponsorship of this research through a 2004 Faculty Research and Creative Work Award grant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peluchette, J.V., Karl, K. & Rust, K. DRESSING TO IMPRESS: BELIEFS AND ATTITUDES REGARDING WORKPLACE ATTIRE. J Bus Psychol 21, 45–63 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-005-9022-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-005-9022-1

Keywords

Navigation