Abstract
Youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) must adhere to a complex treatment regimen to prevent health complications. Friends may provide diabetes-specific support to help youth manage diabetes, but evidence on whether youth benefit from diabetes-specific friend support is inconclusive. The present study first investigated whether satisfaction with friend support was linked to psychological distress and diabetes management. Second, it was investigated whether self-esteem mediated these relations. To this end, 324 Dutch-speaking emerging adults (17–28 years) with T1D completed questionnaires on diabetes-specific friend support, self-esteem, diabetes-specific distress, depressive symptoms, and self-care. HbA1c values were obtained from patients’ physicians. Receiving diabetes-specific support from friends was associated with more diabetes-specific distress, but not for youth who were satisfied with the received support. Diabetes-specific friend support was not associated with other outcomes. Self-esteem did not mediate these relations. These results suggest that associations between diabetes-specific friend support and diabetes management are limited and that support satisfaction should be taken into consideration when examining the role of friend support for youth with T1D.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In the registered analysis plan we opted for listwise deletion to handle missing data in the preliminary analyses, but changed this to multiple imputation for the actual paper. This did not affect the inclusion of control variables in the structural equation models.
A small addendum was made to the registered analysis plan in that the variances and covariances of exogenous variables were estimated freely, rather than the ‘lavaan’ default to fix them at their sample values. This appeared necessary for estimating mediation and moderation effects within the SEM framework and did not alter the path coefficients.
In the reduced sample (excluding 17 year olds), there also was a significant interaction effect between support satisfaction and frequency in predicting diabetes-specific distress (β = -.102, p = .003). In addition, support satisfaction negatively predicted HbA1c (β = -.187, p = .040) and depressive symptoms (β = -.142, p = .048).
References
Andrews, B., Brewin, C. R., & Rose, S. (2003). Gender, social support, and PTSD in victims of violent crime. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16, 421–427.
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480.
Barry, C. M., Madsen, S. D., & DeGrace, A. (2016). Growing up with a little help from their friends in emerging adulthood. In J. J. Arnett (Ed.), The oxford handbook of emerging adulthood (pp. 215–229). Oxford University Press.
Bearman, K. J., & La Greca, A. M. (2002). Assessing friend support of adolescents’ diabetes care: The diabetes social support questionnaire-friends version. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 27, 417–428.
Beckerle, C. M., & Lavin, M. A. (2013). Association of Self-efficacy and Self-care with glycemic control in diabetes. Diabetes Spectrum, 26, 172–178.
Berg, C. A., Butner, J., Wiebe, D. J., Lansing, A. H., Osborn, P., King, P. S., & Butler, J. M. (2017). Developmental model of parent-child coordination for self-regulation across childhood and into emerging adulthood: Type 1 diabetes management as an example. Developmental Review, 46, 1–26.
Berg, C. A., Wiebe, D. J., Lee Tracy, E., Kelly, C. S., Mello, D., Turner, S. L., & White, P. C. (2019). Parental involvement and executive function in emerging adults with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 44, 970–979.
Bolger, N., & Amarel, D. (2007). Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 458–475.
Bolger, N., Zuckerman, A., & Kessler, R. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953–961.
Bouma, J., Ranchor, A., Sanderman, R., & Van Sonderen, E. (1995). Het meten van symptomen van depressie met de CES-D. Een handleiding.
Brazeau, A.-S., Nakhla, M., Wright, M., Henderson, M., Panagiotopoulos, C., Pacaud, D., & Dasgupta, K. (2018). Stigma and its association with glycemic control and hypoglycemia in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes: Cross-sectional study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20, e151.
Commissariat, P. V., Kenowitz, J. R., Trast, J., Heptulla, R. A., & Gonzalez, J. S. (2016). Developing a personal and social identity with type 1 diabetes during adolescence: A hypothesis generative study. Qualitative Health Research, 26, 672–684.
Daneman, D. (2006). Type 1 diabetes. The Lancet, 367, 847–858.
Doe, E. (2018). An analysis of the relationships between peer support and diabetes outcomes in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Health Psychology, 23, 1356–1366.
Fisher, E. B., Boothroyd, R. I., Coufal, M. M., Baumann, L. C., Mbanya, J. C., Rotheram-Borus, M. J., & Tanasugarn, C. (2012). Peer support for self-management of diabetes improved outcomes in international settings. Health Affairs, 31, 130–139.
Fisher, J. D., Nadler, A., & Whitcher-Alagna, S. (1982). Recipient reactions to aid. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 27–54.
Gignac, G. E. (2016). The higher-order model imposes a proportionality constraint: That is why the bifactor model tends to fit better. Intelligence, 55, 57–68.
Gleason, M. E., Iida, M., Bolger, N., & Shrout, P. E. (2003). Daily supportive equity in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1036–1045.
Hains, A. A., Berlin, K. S., Davies, W. H., Smothers, M. K., Sato, A. F., & Alemzadeh, R. (2007). Attributions of adolescents with type 1 diabetes related to performing diabetes care around friends and peers: The moderating role of friend support. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32, 561–570.
Helgeson, V. S., Palladino, D. K., Reynolds, K. A., Becker, D. J., Escobar, O., & Siminerio, L. (2014). Relationships and health among emerging adults with and without type 1 diabetes. Health Psychology, 33, 1125–1133.
Idalski Carcone, A., Ellis, D. A., Weisz, A., & Naar-King, S. (2011). Social support for diabetes illness management: Supporting adolescents and caregivers. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 32, 581–590.
King, P. S., Berg, C. A., Butner, J., Butler, J. M., & Wiebe, D. J. (2014). Longitudinal trajectories of parental involvement in type 1 diabetes and adolescents’ adherence. Health Psychology, 33, 424–432.
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
Kowitt, S. D., Ayala, G. X., Cherrington, A. L., Horton, L. A., Safford, M. M., Soto, S., & Fisher, E. B. (2017). Examining the support peer supporters provide using structural equation modeling: Nondirective and directive support in diabetes management. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 51, 810–821.
La Greca, A. M., Auslander, W. F., Greco, P., Spetter, D., Fisher, E. B., Jr., & Santiago, J. V. (1995). I get by with a little help from my family and friends: Adolescents’ support for diabetes care. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 20, 449–476.
Lambert, V., & Keogh, D. (2015). Striving to live a normal life: A review of children and young people’s experience of feeling different when living with a long term condition. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 30, 63–77.
Lane, J. A., & Fink, R. S. (2015). Attachment, social support satisfaction, and well-being during life transition in emerging adulthood. The Counseling Psychologist, 43, 1034–1058.
Lau, E. Y. H., Chan, K. K. S., & Lam, C. B. (2018). Social support and adjustment outcomes of first-year university students in Hong Kong: Self-esteem as a mediator. Journal of College Student Development, 59, 129–134.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
Lepore, S. J., Glaser, D. B., & Roberts, K. J. (2008). On the positive relation between received social support and negative affect: A test of the triage and self-esteem threat models in women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 17, 1210–1215.
Luszczynska, A., Sarkar, Y., & Knoll, N. (2007). Received social support, self-efficacy, and finding benefits in disease as predictors of physical functioning and adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Patient Education and Counseling, 66, 37–42.
Malik, F. S., Panlasigui, N., Gritton, J., Gill, H., Joyce, P., & Moreno, M. A. (2019). Adolescent perspectives on the use of social media to support type 1 diabetes management: Focus group study. Journal of medical Internet research, 21, e12149.
Malik, J. A., & Koot, H. M. (2012). Assessing diabetes support in adolescents: Factor structure of the modified diabetes social support questionnaire (DSSQ–Friends). Diabetic Medicine, 29, 232–240.
Markowitz, B., Parsons, J. A., & Advani, A. (2016). Diabetes in emerging adulthood: Transitions lost in translation. Canadian Journal of Diabetes, 41, 1–5.
Mattacola, E. (2020). “They think it’s helpful, but it’s not”: A qualitative analysis of the experience of social support provided by peers in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 27, 444–454.
Meeus, W. (2016). Adolescent psychosocial development: A review of longitudinal models and research. Developmental Psychology, 52, 1969–1993.
Morelli, S. A., Lee, I. A., Arnn, M. E., & Zaki, J. (2015). Emotional and instrumental support provision interact to predict well-being. Emotion, 15, 484–493.
Naar-King, S., Podolski, C.-L., Ellis, D. A., Frey, M. A., & Templin, T. (2006). Social ecological model of illness management in high-risk youths with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 785–789.
Nadler, A., Fisher, J. D., & Itzhak, S. B. (1983). With a little help from my friend: Effect of single or multiple act aid as a function of donor and task characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 310–321.
Newsom, J. T., Rook, K. S., Nishishiba, M., Sorkin, D. H., & Mahan, T. L. (2005). Understanding the relative importance of positive and negative social exchanges: Examining specific domains and appraisals. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 60, 304–312.
Oris, L., Rassart, J., Prikken, S., Verschueren, M., Goubert, L., Moons, P., & Luyckx, K. (2016). Illness identity in adolescents and emerging adults with type 1 diabetes: Introducing the illness identity questionnaire. Diabetes Care, 39, 757–763.
Pihlaskari, A. K., Wiebe, D. J., Troxel, N. R., Stewart, S. M., & Berg, C. A. (2018). Perceived peer support and diabetes management from adolescence into early emerging adulthood. Health Psychology, 37, 1055–1058.
Polonsky, W. H., Anderson, B. J., Lohrer, P. A., Welch, G., Jacobson, A. M., Aponte, J. E., & Schwartz, C. E. (1995). Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes Care, 18, 754–760.
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The ces-d scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.
Raymaekers, K., Oris, L., Prikken, S., Moons, P., Goossens, E., Weets, I., & Luyckx, K. (2017). The role of peers for diabetes management in adolescents and emerging adults with type 1 diabetes: A longitudinal study. Diabetes Care, 40, 1678–1684.
Raymaekers, K., Prikken, S., Vanhalst, J., Moons, P., Goossens, E., Oris, L., et al. (2020). The social context and illness identity in youth with type 1 diabetes: A three-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(2), 449–466.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.
Snoek, F. J., Pouwer, F., Welch, G. W., & Polonsky, W. H. (2000). Diabetes-related emotional distress in Dutch and U.S. diabetic patients: Cross cultural validity of the problem areas in diabetes scale. Diabetes Care, 23, 1305–1309.
Sparud-Lundin, C., Öhrn, I., & Danielson, E. (2010). Redefining relationships and identity in young adults with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66, 128–138.
Symister, P., & Friend, R. (2003). The influence of social support and problematic support on optimism and depression in chronic illness: A prospective study evaluating self-esteem as a mediator. Health Psychology, 22, 123–129.
Vallis, M., Willaing, I., & Holt, R. I. G. (2018). Emerging adulthood and Type 1 diabetes: Insights from the DAWN2 Study. Diabetic Medicine, 35, 203–213.
Van der Linden, F., Dijkman, T. A., & Roeders, P. (1983). Metingen van kenmerken van het persoonssysteem en sociale systeem [Measurements of features of the person system and the social system]. Hoogveld Instituut.
van der Ven, N. C. W., Weinger, K., Yi, J., Pouwer, F., Adèr, H., van der Ploeg, H. M., & Snoek, F. J. (2003). The confidence in diabetes self-care scale: Psychometric properties of a new measure of diabetes-specific self-efficacy in Dutch and US patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 26, 713–718.
Van Vleet, M., & Helgeson, V. S. (2020). Friend and peer relationships among youth with type 1 diabetes. In A. M. Delamater & D. G. Marrero (Eds.), Behavioral diabetes: Social ecological perspectives for Pediatric and adult populations (pp. 121–138). Springer International Publishing.
Weinger, K., Butler, H. A., Welch, G. W., & La Greca, A. M. (2005). Measuring diabetes self-care: A psychometric analysis of the self-care inventory-revised with adults. Diabetes Care, 28, 1346–1352.
Wilson, V. (2010). Students’ experiences of managing type 1 diabetes. Nursing Children and Young People, 22, 25–28.
Young, M. T., Lord, J. H., Patel, N. J., Gruhn, M. A., & Jaser, S. S. (2014). Good cop, bad cop: quality of parental involvement in type 1 diabetes management in youth. Current Diabetes Reports, 14, 546–558.
Zimmerman, C., Albanese-O’Neill, A., & Haller, M. J. (2019). Advances in type 1 diabetes technology over the last decade. European endocrinology, 15, 70–76.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Human and animal rights and informed consent
A total of 1450 eligible participants were mailed a package including a questionnaire bundle and informed consent forms with detailed information about the study’s purpose and content. Parents provided consent for youth below 18 years. The Medical Ethics Committee and Social and Societal Ethics Committee of KU Leuven provided ethical approval (file number: S57299).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Raymaekers, K., Helgeson, V.S., Prikken, S. et al. Diabetes-specific friend support in emerging adults with type 1 diabetes: Does satisfaction with support matter?. J Behav Med 44, 402–411 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-021-00211-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-021-00211-3