Combining risk communication strategies to simultaneously convey the risks of four diseases associated with physical inactivity to socio-demographically diverse populations

Abstract

A single risk factor can increase the risk of developing multiple diseases, but most risk communication research has been conducted in the context of a single disease. We explored which combination of three recommended risk communication strategies is most effective in simultaneously conveying risk estimates of four diseases associated with physical inactivity: colon cancer, stroke, diabetes, and heart disease. Participants (N = 1161, 50% no college experience, 50% racial/ethnic minority) were shown hypothetical risk estimates for each of the four diseases. All four diseases were placed at varying heights on 1 of 12 vertical bar charts (i.e., “risk ladders”) to indicate their respective probabilities. The risk ladders varied in a 2 (risk reduction information: present/absent) × 2 (numerical format: words/words and numbers) × 3 (social comparison information: none/somewhat higher than average/much higher than average) full factorial design. Participants were randomly assigned to view one of the risk ladders and then completed a questionnaire assessing message comprehension, message acceptance, physical activity-related risk and efficacy beliefs, and physical activity intentions. Higher message acceptance was found among (1) people who received risk reduction information versus those who did not (p = .01), and (2) people who did not receive social comparison information versus those told that they were at higher than average risk (p = .03). Further, absolute cognitive perceived risk of developing “any of the diseases shown in the picture” was higher among people who did not receive social comparison information (p = .03). No other main effects and only very few interactions with demographic variables were found. Combining recommended risk communication strategies did not improve or impair key cognitive or affective precursors of health behavior change. It might not be necessary to provide people with extensive information when communicating risk estimates of multiple diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. 1.

    The original intent was to show participants either no social comparison information, information that they were at lower than average risk, or information that they were at higher than average risk. However, an error resulted in participants who should have been assigned to the lower than average condition instead being shown information that they were at somewhat higher than average risk. We collapsed the two higher than average conditions into 1 “higher than average” category, resulting in 2 social comparison conditions (i.e. absent/higher than average).

References

  1. Abraham, C., & Sheeran, P. (2004). Deciding to exercise: The role of anticipated regret. British Journal of Health Psychology, 9, 269–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barlas, F. M., & Thomas, R. K. (2017, May). Good questionnaire design: Best practices in the mobile era. Paper presented at American Association for Public Opinion Research Conference, New Orleans.

  3. Barnes, R., Giles-Corti, B., Bauman, A., Rosenberg, M., Bull, F. C., & Leavy, J. E. (2013). Does neighbourhood walkability moderate the effects of mass media communication strategies to promote regular physical activity? Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 45, 86–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brennan, E., Durkin, S. J., Cotter, T., Harper, T., & Wakefield, M. A. (2011). Mass media campaigns designed to support new pictorial health warnings on cigarette packets: Evidence of a complementary relationship. Tobacco Control, 20, 412–418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brewer, N. (2011). Chapter 2: Goals. In B. Fisschoff, N. Brewer, & J. Downs (Eds.), Communicating risks and benefits: An evidence-based user’s guide (pp. 3–11). New Hampshire: US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brewer, N., Chapman, G., Gibbons, F., Gerrard, M., McCaul, K., & Weinstein, N. D. (2007). Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: The example of vaccination. Health Psychology, 26, 136–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brewer, N. T., DeFrank, J. T., & Gilkey, M. B. (2016). Anticipated regret and health behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 35, 1264–1275.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. FastStats—Deaths and Mortality. Retrieved October, from 2013 from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/deaths.htm.

  9. Claassen, L., Henneman, L., Nijpels, G., Dekker, J., Marteau, T., & Timmermans, D. (2011). Causal beliefs and perceptions of risk for diabetes and cardiovascular disease, The Netherlands, 2007. Preventing Chronic Disease, 8, A130.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Conner, M., & Norman, P. (Eds.). (1995). The theory of planned behaviour and health behaviours Philadelphia. PA: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cuite, C., Weinstein, N. D., Emmons, K., Colditz, G. (2008). A test of numeric formats for risk communication. Medical Decision Making, 28(3), 377–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dillard, A. J., Ubel, P. A., Smith, D. M., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Nair, V., Derry, H. A. et al. (2011). The distinct role of comparative risk perceptions in a breast cancer prevention program. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 42(2), 262–268.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Evans, A. T., Peters, E., Strasser, A. A., Emery, L. F., Sheerin, K. M., & Romer, D. (2015). Graphic warning labels elicit affective and thoughtful responses from smokers: Results of a randomized clinical trial. PLoS ONE, 10, e0142879.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Fagerlin, A., Wang, C., & Ubel, P. A. (2005). Reducing the influence of anecdotal reasoning on people’s health care decisions: Is a picture worth a thousand statistics? Medical Decision Making, 25, 398–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fagerlin, A., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Nair, V., Derry, H. A., McClure, J. B., Greene, S., et al. (2010). Women’s decisions regarding tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention: Responses to a tailored decision aid. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 119, 613–620.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Fagerlin, A., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., & Ubel, P. A. (2007). “If I’m better than average, then I’m ok?”: Comparative information influences beliefs about risk and benefits. Patient Education and Counseling, 69, 140–144.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferrer, R. A., & Klein, W. M. (2015). Risk perceptions and health behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 5, 85–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fischhoff, B., Brewer, N. T., & Downs, J. S. (2011). Communicating risks and benefits: An evidence-based user’s guide. Silver Spring: Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fisher, W. A., Fisher, J. D., & Harman, J. (2003). The information-motivation behavioral skills model: A general social psychological approach to understanding and promoting health behavior. In J. Suls & K. A. Wallston (Eds.), Social psychological foundations of health and illness (pp. 82–106). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  21. French, D. P., Sutton, S. R., Marteau, T. M., & Kinmonth, A. L. (2004). The impact of personal and social comparison information about health risk. British Journal of Health Psychology, 9, 187–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Galesic, M., & Bosnjak, M. (2009). Effects of questionnaire length on participation and indicators of response quality in a web survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Galesic, M., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2011). Graph literacy: A cross-cultural comparison. Medical Decision Making, 31, 444–457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Galesic, M., & Okan, Y. (2013). Short graph literacy scale. Paper presented at the 35th annual meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making, Baltimore, MD, United States.

  25. Garcia-Retamero, R., & Cokely, E. T. (2013). Communicating health risks with visual aids. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Han, P. K., Hootsmans, N., Neilson, M., Roy, B., Kungel, T., Gutheil, C., et al. (2013). The value of personalised risk information: A qualitative study of the perceptions of patients with prostate cancer. British Medical Journal Open, 3, e003226.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Harris, P. R., & Smith, V. (2005). When the risks are low: The impact of absolute and comparative information on disturbance and understanding in US and UK samples. Psychology & Health, 20, 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hay, J., McCaul, K. D., & Mangan, R. E. (2006). Does worry about breast cancer predict screening behaviors? A meta-analysis of the prospective evidence. Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory, 42, 401–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hay, J. L., Orom, H., Kiviniemi, M. T., & Waters, E. A. (2015). “I don’t know” my cancer risk: Exploring deficits in cancer knowledge and information-seeking skills to explain an often-overlooked participant response. Medical Decision Making, 35, 436–445.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Hoffrage, U., Lindsay, S., Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Communicating statistical information. Science, 290, 2261–2262.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Janssen, E., van Osch, L., de Vries, H., & Lechner, L. (2010). Measuring risk perceptions of skin cancer: Reliability and validity of different operationalizations. British Journal of Health Psychology, 16, 92–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Janssen, E., van Osch, L., de Vries, H., & Lechner, L. (2012a). The influence of narrative risk communication on feelings of cancer risk. British Journal of Health Psychology, 18, 407–419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Janssen, E., Waters, E. A., van Osch, L., Lechner, L., & de Vries, H. (2012b). The importance of affectively-laden beliefs about health risks: The case of tobacco use and sun protection. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 37, 11–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Jones, L. W., Sinclair, R. C., & Courneya, K. S. (2003). The effects of source credibility and message framing on exercise intentions, behaviors, and attitudes: An integration of the elaboration likelihood model and prospect theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Keller, C., Siegrist, M., & Visschers, V. (2009). Effect of risk ladder format on risk perception in high- and low-numerate individuals. Risk Analysis, 29, 1255–1264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Klein, W. M. P. (2002). Comparative risk estimates relative to the average peer predict behavioral intentions and concern about absolute risk. Risk, Decision & Policy, 7, 193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kutner, M., Greenburg, E., Jin, Y., & Paulsen, C. (2006). The health literacy of america’s adults: Results from the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy (NCES 2006-483). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lipkus, I. M. (2007). Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: Suggested best practices and future recommendations. Medical Decision Making, 27, 696–713.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lipkus, I. M., Samsa, G., & Rimer, B. K. (2001). General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making, 21, 37–44.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. McGuire, W. J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  41. McQueen, A., Kreuter, M. W., Kalesan, B., & Alcaraz, K. I. (2011). Understanding narrative effects: The impact of breast cancer survivor stories on message processing, attitudes, and beliefs among African American women. Health Psychology, 30, 674–682.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Nair, V., Strecher, V., Fagerlin, A., Ubel, P., Resnicow, K., Murphy, S., et al. (2008). Screening experiments and fractional factorial designs in behavioral intervention research. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 1354–1359.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. National Cancer Institute. (2001). Making health communication programs work: A planner’s guide. NIH publication no. 04-5145. Bethesda, MD.

  44. National Cancer Institute. (2009). Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) items for years 2003-2007. Retrieved June 7, 2010 from http://hints.cancer.gov/questions/all-questions1.jsp.

  45. National Cancer Institute. (2014). Health information national trends survey 4 (HINTS 4) Cycle 4 Questionnaire. Retrieved November 1, 2016 from http://hints.cancer.gov/.

  46. Nelson, W. L., Moser, R. P., & Han, P. K. J. (2013). Exploring objective and subjective numeracy at a population level: Findings from the 2007 health information national trends survey (HINTS). Journal of Health Communication, 18, 192–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Nelson, W., Reyna, V. F., Fagerlin, A., Lipkus, I., & Peters, E. (2008). Clinical implications of numeracy: Theory and practice. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35, 261–274.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Peters, E., Dieckmann, N., Dixon, A., Hibbard, J. H., & Mertz, C. K. (2007). Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers. Medical Care Research and Review, 64, 169–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Peters, E., Hart, P. S., Tusler, M., & Fraenkel, L. (2014). Numbers matter to informed patient choices: A randomized design across age and numeracy levels. Medical Decision Making, 34, 430–442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Reyna, V. F. (2008). A theory of medical decision making and health: Fuzzy trace theory. Medical Decision Making, 28, 850–865.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Reyna, V. F., Nelson, W. L., Han, P. K., & Dieckmann, N. F. (2009). How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 943–973.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Schwarzer, R. (2001). Social-cognitive factors in changing health-related behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Schwarzer, R., & Fuchs, R. (1995). Self-efficacy and health behaviours. In M. Conner & P. Norman (Eds.), Predicting health behaviour (pp. 169–196). Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sheeran, P., Harris, P. R., & Epton, T. (2013). Does heightening risk appraisals change people’s intentions and behavior? A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 511–543.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sinayev, A., Peters, E., Tusler, M., & Fraenkel, L. (2015). Presenting numeric information with percentages and descriptive risk labels: A randomized trial. Medical Decision Making, 35, 937–947.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Sullivan, L., & D’Agostino, R. (2003). Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to ordinal scaled data as arising in randomized controlled trials. Statistics in Medicine, 22, 1317–1334.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Tait, A. R., Voepel-Lewis, T., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., & Fagerlin, A. (2010). The effect of format on parents’ understanding of the risks and benefits of clinical research: a comparison between text, tables, and graphics. Journal of Health Communication, 15, 487–501.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Thomas, R. K., & Barlas, F. M. (2017). Thumbs up or down? Emojis as a response format for online surveys. Paper presented at the Advertising Research Foundation Annual Conference, New York.

  59. Wang, C., Miller, S. M., Egleston, B. L., Hay, J. L., & Weinberg, D. S. (2010). Beliefs about the causes of breast and colorectal cancer among women in the general population. Cancer Causes and Control, 21, 99–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Waters, E. A., Fagerlin, A., & Zikmund-Fisher, B. J. (2016). Avoiding common pitfalls of risk communication. In M. A. Diefenbach, D. J. Bowen, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of health decision science (pp. 265–279). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Waters, E. A., Hay, J. L., Orom, H., Kiviniemi, M. T., & Drake, B. F. (2013). “Don’t know” responses to risk perception measures: Implications for underserved populations. Medical Decision Making, 33, 271–281.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Waters, E. A., Sullivan, H. W., Nelson, W., & Hesse, B. W. (2009). What is my cancer risk? Identifying how internet-based cancer risk calculators convey individualized risk estimates to the public. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11, e33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Waters, E. A., Weinstein, N. D., Colditz, G. A., & Emmons, K. (2006). Formats for improving risk communication in medical tradeoff decisions. Journal of Health Communication, 11, 167–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Weinstein, N. D. (1999). What does it mean to understand a risk? Evaluating risk comprehension. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 25, 15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Weinstein, N. D., Kwitel, A., McCaul, K. D., Magnan, R. E., Gerrard, M., & Gibbons, F. X. (2007). Risk perceptions: Assessment and relationship to influenza vaccination. Health Psychology, 26, 146–151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Weinstein, N. D., Lyon, J. E., Cuite, C. L., & Sandman, P. M. (1998). Experimental evidence for stages of health behavior change: The precaution adoption process model applied to home radon testing. Health Psychology, 17, 445–453.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Weinstein, N. D., Sandman, P. M., & Miller, P. (1991). Communicating effectively about risk magnitudes, phase two. New Brunswick: Environmental Communication Research Program, Cook College, Rutgers University.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Weinstein, N. D., Sandman, P. M., & Roberts, N. E. (1989). Communicating effectively about risk magnitudes, phase one. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Willis, G. B. (2004). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Windschitl, P. D., Martin, R., & Flugstad, A. R. (2002). Context and the interpretation of likelihood information: The role of intergroup comparisons on perceived vulnerability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 742–755.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59, 329–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Witteman, H. O., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Waters, E. A., Gavaruzzi, T., & Fagerlin, A. (2011). Risk estimates from an online risk calculator are more believable and recalled better when expressed as integers. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13, e54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Wold, K. S., Byers, T., Crane, L. A., & Ahnen, D. (2005). What do cancer survivors believe causes cancer? Cancer Causes and Control, 16, 115–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Woloshin, S., Schwartz, L. M., & Ellner, A. (2003). Making sense of risk information on the web: Don’t forget the basics. British Medical Journal, 327, 695.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. World Health Organization. (2016). Physical activity. Factsheet. Retrieved December 7, 2016 from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs385/en/.

  76. Zikmund-Fisher, B. J. (2013). The right tool is what they need, not what we have: A taxonomy of appropriate levels of precision in patient risk communication. Medical Care Research and Review, 70, 37S–49S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Fagerlin, A., & Ubel, P. A. (2010). A demonstration of ‘‘less can be more’’ in risk graphics. Medical Decision Making, 30, 661–671.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Susan Gillham Design for excellent work creating the visual displays and the following individuals for their valuable input regarding study design and interpretation of the results: Dr. Graham A. Colditz, Dr. Deborah J. Bowen, Mr. Hank Dart, and Dr. Sarah Gehlert.

Funding

The results presented in this paper were presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society of Medical Decision Making in 2016. This research was supported by funding awarded to Erika Waters from the U.S. National Cancer Institute (R01CA190391). The funding agreement ensured the authors’ independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, writing, and publishing the report. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official view of the National Cancer Institute.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erika A. Waters.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Eva Janssen, Robert A. C. Ruiter, and Erika A. Waters declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and animal rights and Informed consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1518 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Janssen, E., Ruiter, R.A.C. & Waters, E.A. Combining risk communication strategies to simultaneously convey the risks of four diseases associated with physical inactivity to socio-demographically diverse populations. J Behav Med 41, 318–332 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-017-9894-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Risk communication
  • Decision making
  • Physical activity
  • Health disparities