Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Psychometric evaluation of the Condom Barriers and Motivations Scale (CBMS)

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Condom Barriers and Motivations Scale (CBMS) was developed to measure four distinct categories of barriers and motives to condom use, including: risk reduction motivations, pleasure reduction barriers, intimacy interference barriers, and partner pressure barriers. The CBMS is a 16-item scale with four items that correspond to each of these subscales. The CBMS was tested in two samples of gay and bisexual men. Results support the reliability and validity of the scale and its structure. Results also indicate that CBMS subscales are distinct from general measures of sexual wellbeing, personality factors, or relationship quality (i.e., discriminant validity) and are associated with self-reported condom use with different partner types (i.e., construct validity). The CBMS can be helpful in better understanding the dynamics of condom use in the context of pre-exposure prophylaxis decision-making, and can shed light on innovative approaches to enhance condom use as part of comprehensive HIV prevention and sexual health goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 170–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alaei, K., Paynter, C. A., Juan, S. C., & Alaei, A. (2016). Using pre-exposure prophylaxis, losing condoms? Preexposure prophylaxis promotion may undermine safe sex. AIDS, 30(18), 2753–2756.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bauermeister, J. A., Carballo-Diéguez, A., Ventuneac, A., & Dolezal, C. (2009). Assessing motivations to engage in intentional condomless anal intercourse in HIV-risk contexts (“bareback sex”) among men who have sex with men. AIDS Education and Prevention, 21, 156.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, R. C. (2009). Barebacking: A review of the literature. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 754–764.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birrell, P. J., Owen, N. G., Delpech, V. C., et al. (2013). HIV incidence in men who have sex with men in England and Wales 2001-10: A nationwide population study. Lancet Infectious Diseases, 13, 313–318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blechner, M. J. (2002). Intimacy, pleasure, risk, and safety: Discussion of Cheuvront’s high-risk sexual behavior in the treatment of HIV-negative patients. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Psychotherapy, 6, 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, I. S. (1984). Development of a scale to measure attitude toward the condom as a method of birth control. Journal of Sex Research, 120, 255–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burlew, A., Wilson, J., Montgomery, L., Peteet, B., Johnson, C., & Hatch-Maillette, M. (2015). Do masculinity and perceived condom barriers predict heterosexual HIV risk behaviors among black substance abusing men? Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice, 7, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. N., Brooks, A. J., Pavlicova, M., Hu, M. C., Hatch-Maillette, M. A., Calsyn, D. A., et al. (2016). Barriers to condom use: Results for men and women enrolled in HIV risk reduction trials in outpatient drug treatment. Journal of HIV/AIDS and Social Services, 15, 130–146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catania, J. A., Kegeles, S. M., & Coates, T. J. (1990). Towards an understanding of risk behavior: An AIDS risk reduction model (ARRM). Health Education Quarterly, 17, 53–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CDC. (2014). Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States-2014 clinical practice guideline. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease and Control.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2015). HIV Surveillance Report, 2013 (Vol. 25). http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/surveillance/. Accessed 10 Aug 2016.

  • Champion, V. L. (1984). Instrument development for health belief model constructs. Advances in Nursing Science, 6(3), 73–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, R., Graham, C. A., Yarber, W. L., Sanders, S. A., Milhausen, R., & Mena, L. (2016). Measures of attitudes toward communication about condom use: Their relationships with sexual risk behavior among young black men who have sex with men. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 43, 94–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, R., Milhausen, R., Yarver, W. L., Sanders, S. A., & Graham, C. A. (2008). Condom “turn offs” among adults: An exploratory study. International Journal of STD andAIDS, 19, 590–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, R., Yarber, W. L., Sanders, S. A., & Graham, C. A. (2005). Condom discomfort and associated problems with their use among university students. Journal of American College Health, 54, 143–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, L. Z., Macapagal, K. R., Rivera, Z., Prescott, T. L., Ybarra, M. L., & Mustankis, B. (2015). To have sex or not to have sex? An online focus group study of sexual decision making among experienced and inexperienced gay and bisexual adolescents. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 2027–2040.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, L. A., Driffin, D. D., Bauermeister, J., Smith, H., & Conway-Washington, C. (2015). Minimal awareness and stalled uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among risk, HIV-negative, Black men who have sex with men. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 29, 423–429.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. D., & Fisher, W. A. (1992). Changing AIDS-risk behavior. Psychology Bulletin, 111, 455–474.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gakumo, C. A., Moneyham, L. D., Enah, C. C., & Childs, G. D. (2012). The moderating effect of sexual pressure on young urban women’s condom use. Research in Nursing and Health, 35, 4–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gamarel, K. E., & Golub, S. A. (2015). Intimacy motivations and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adoption intentions among HIV-negative men who have sex with men (MSM) in romantic relationships. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 49, 177–186.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gamarel, K. E., Reisner, S. L., Darbes, L. A., Hoff, C. C., Chakravarty, D., Nemoto, T., et al. (2016). Dyadic dynamics of HIV risk among transgender women and their primary male sexual partners: the role of sexual agreement types and motivations. AIDS Care, 28, 104–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goedel, W. C., Halkitis, P. N., Greene, R. E., & Duncan, D. T. (2016). Correlates of awareness of and willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men who use geosocial-networking smartphone applications in New York City. AIDS and Behavior, 20, 1435–1442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Golub, S. A. (2014). Tensions between the epidemiology and psychology of HIV risk: Implications for pre-ex. AIDS and Behavior, 18, 1686–1693.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Golub, S. A., Starks, T. J., Payton, G., & Parsons, J. T. (2012). The critical role of intimacy in sexual risk behavior of gay and bisexual men. AIDS and Behavior, 16, 626–632.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Grady, W. R., Klepinger, D. H., Billy, J. O., & Tanfer, K. (1993). Condom characteristics: The perceptions and preferences of men in the United States. Family Planning Perspectives, 25, 67–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M., Lama, J. R., Anderson, P. L., et al. (2010). Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. New England Journal of Medicine, 363, 2587–2599.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Harawa, N. T., Williams, J. K., Ramamurthi, H. C., & Bingham, T. (2006). Perceptions towards condom use, sexual activity, and HIV disclosure among HIV-positive African American men who have sex with men: Implications for heterosexual transmission. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 682–694.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, G. J., & Elford, J. (2010). Sexual risk behaviour of men who have sex with men: Emerging patterns and new challenges. Current Opinions in Infectious Diseases, 23, 39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hau, K. T., & Marsh, H. W. (2004). The use of item parcels in structural equation modelling: Non-normal data and small sample sizes. British Journal of Math and Statistical Psycholology, 57, 327–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helweg-Larsen, M., & Colliins, B. E. (1994). The UCLA Multidimensional Condom Attitudes Scale: Documenting the complex determinants of condom use in college students. Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 224–237.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hensel, D. J., Stupiansky, N. W., Herbenick, D., & Dodge, B. (2012). Sexual pleasure during condom-protected vaginal sex among heterosexual men. Journal of Sex Medicine, 9, 1272–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, J. A., Tanner, A. E., & Janssen, E. (2009). Arousal loss related to safer sex and risk of pregnancy: Implications for women’s and men’s sexual health. Perspectives in Sex and Reproductive Health, 41, 150–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, J. A., & Wang, Y. (2015). The role of young adults’ pleasure attitudes in shaping condom use. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 1329–1332.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, B. J., Amick, E. E., & Sanders, S. A. (2011). Condoms and US college-aged men and women: Briefly assessing attitudes toward condoms and gender condom use behaviours. Sexual Health, 8, 372–377.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, C. C., Campbell, C. K., Chakravarty, D., & Darbes, L. A. (2016). Relationship-based predictors of sexual risk for HIV among MSM couples: A systematic review of the literature. AIDS and Behavior, 20, 2873–2892.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. (2006). Reliability and validity of the Sexual Pressure Scale. Research in Nursing and Health, 29, 281–293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, J. H. (2006). Factr analysis in counseling psychology research, training, and practice: Principles, advances, and applications. Counseling Psychologist, 34, 648–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalichman, S. C., & Rompa, D. (2001). The Sexual Compulsivity Scale: Further development and use with HIV-positive persons. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 379–395.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, A. Y., Cohen, S. E., Vittinghoff, E., et al. (2015). Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection integrated with municipal- and community-based sexual health services. Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine, 176, 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKellar, D. A., Valleroy, L. A., Secura, G. M., Behel, S., Bingham, T., Celentano, D. D., et al. (2007). Perceptions of lifetime risk and actual risk for acquiring HIV among young men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior, 11, 263–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Madu, S. N., & Peltzer, K. (2003). Factor structure of condom attitudes among Black South African university students. Journal of Social and Behavioral Perspectives, 31, 265–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, K. H., & Krakower, D. S. (2015). If PrEP decreases HIV transmission, what is impeding its uptake? Clinical Infectious Disease. http://www.natap.org/2015/HIV/ClinInfectDis2015-Mayer-cid_civ665.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2016.

  • Mimiaga, M. J., Goldhammer, H., Belanoff, C., Tetu, A. M., & Mayer, K. H. (2007). Men who have sex with men: Perceptions about sexual risk, HIV and sexually transmitted disease testing, and provider communication. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 34, 113–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, E., Johnson, I., & Sigler, R. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions of women’s participation in unwanted sexual intercourse. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 515–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Operario, D., Nemoto, T., Iwamoto, M., & Moore, T. (2011). Unprotected sexual behavior and HIV risk in the context of primary partnerships for transgender women. AIDS and Behavior, 15, 674–682.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, J. T., & Bimbi, D. S. (2007). Intentional unprotected anal intercourse among men who have sex with men: Barebacking—From behavior to identity. AIDS and Behavior, 11, 277–287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, J. T., Halkitis, P. N., Bimbi, D. S., & Borkowski, T. (2000). Perceptions of the benefits and costs associated with condom use and unprotected sex among late adolescent college students. Journal of Adolescences, 23, 377–391.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, J. T., Halkitis, P. N., Wolitski, R., & Gomez, C. (2003). Correlates of sexual risk behavior among HIV-positive men who have sex with men. AIDS Education and Prevevention, 15, 383–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2007). Conceptualizing the “wantedness” of women’s consensual and nonconsensual sexual experiences: Implications for how women label their experiences with rape. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 72–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. N., Cambiano, V., Nakagawa, F., et al. (2013). Increased HIV incidence in men who have sex with men despite high levels of ART-induced viral suppression: Analysis of an extensively documented epidemic. PLoS ONE, 8, e55312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, J. A., & Halkitis, P. N. (2009). Environmental factors in relation to unprotected sexual behavior among gay, bisexual and other MSM. AIDS Education and Prevention, 21, 340–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, J. O., Redding, C. A., Harlow, L. L., Rossi, J. S., & Velicer, W. F. (1994). The transtheoretical model of change and HIV prevention: A review. Health Education Quarterly, 21, 471–486.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Randolph, M. E., Pinkerton, S. D., Bogart, L. M., Cecil, H., & Abramson, P. R. (2007). Sexual pleasure and condom use. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 844–848.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reece, M., Herbenick, D., Hollub, A. V., et al. (2010). A psychometric assessment of the Multi-Factor Attitude Toward Condom Scale (MFACS). International Journal of STD and AIDS, 22, 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measure commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacco, W. P., Levine, B., Reed, D. L., & Thompason, K. (1991). Attitudes about condom use as an AIDS-relevant behavior: Their factor structure and relation to condom use. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 265–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacker, E. S., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). Structural equation modeling. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, H. M., & Klausner, J. D. (2016). Sexually transmitted infections and pre-exposure prophylaxis: Challenges and opportunities among men who have sex with men in the US. AIDS Research and Therapy, 13. doi:10.1186/s12981-016-0089-8.

  • Scott-Sheldon, L. A., & Johnson, B. T. (2006). Eroticizing creates safer sex: A research synthesis. Journal of Primary Prevevention, 27, 619–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, W. E., Fisher, T. D., & Walters, A. S. (1993). The multidimensional sexuality questionnaire: An objective self-report measure of psychological tendencies associated with human sexuality. Annals of Sex Research, 6, 27–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starks, T. J., Payton, G., Golub, S. A., Weinberger, C. L., & Parsons, J. T. (2014). Contexualizing condom use: Intimacy interference, stigma, and unprotected sex. Journal of Health Psychology, 19, 711–720.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theodore, P. S., Durán, R., Antoni, M. H., Fernandez, M. I., & Schneiderman, N. (2004). Intimacy and sexual behavior among HIV-positive men-who-have-sex-with-men in primary relationships. AIDS and Behavior, 8, 321–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C. Y., & Muthen, B. (2002). Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes (Technical Report). Los Angeles, CA: University of California at Los Angeles, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the hard work of members of the Hunter HIV/AIDS Research Team (HART), including Anthony Surace, Kailip Boonrai, Corina Lelutiu-Weinberger, Inna Saboshchuk, and Louisa Thompson. We also thank Dr. Jeffrey Parsons and the staff at the Center for HIV Educational Studies and Training. We are grateful to the participants who gave their time and energy to this study, and to Dr. Willo Pequegnat and Dr. Michael Stirratt for their support.

Funding

This project was funded by R01MH095565 and R01AA022067 (S.A. Golub, PI) from the National Institutes of Mental Health and Kristi Gamarel was supported by Grant U24AA022000 (D. Operario, PI) from the National Institutes of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Hunter College of the City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA

    Sarit A. Golub

  2. Basic and Applied Social Psychology PhD Program, The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA

    Sarit A. Golub

  3. Hunter HIV/AIDS Research Team (HART), New York, NY, USA

    Sarit A. Golub & Kristi E. Gamarel

  4. Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA

    Kristi E. Gamarel

Authors
  1. Sarit A. Golub
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kristi E. Gamarel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarit A. Golub.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

As part of an NIH-funded PrEP Demonstration Project (R01AA022067), Sarit Golub receives study drug and partial support for DBS testing from Gilead Sciences. Kristi Gamarel declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights and Informed consent

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Golub, S.A., Gamarel, K.E. Psychometric evaluation of the Condom Barriers and Motivations Scale (CBMS). J Behav Med 40, 494–505 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-016-9815-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-016-9815-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation