Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Affect, work-goal schemas, and work-goal striving among adults with chronic pain: a multilevel structural equation analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For individuals with chronic pain, the within-person influence of affect and goal cognition on daily work-related goal striving is not yet well understood. The present study tested the hypothesis that anticipatory goal cognition in the form of a morning work goal schema mediates the relations between morning affect and later (afternoon and evening) work goal striving. Working adults with chronic pain (N = 131) completed a 21-day diary with morning, afternoon, and evening assessments analyzed via multi-level structural equation modeling. At the within-person level, morning positive and negative affect were positively associated with morning work goal schemas; and morning work goal schemas, in turn, positively predicted both afternoon and evening work goal striving. Our findings underscore the complex dynamics over time of the relationship between affect and self-regulatory processes and have implications for future studies and for interventions to assist working adults with chronic pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The PCP:S chronic pain severity cut off scores are as follows: age 25–44 (male: 10.74 and female: 11.38); age 44–65 (male: 11.38 and female: 13.17); age 65–80 (male: 9.25 and female: 12.74).

References

  • Arnow, B. A., Blasey, C. M., Constantino, M. J., Robinson, R., Hunkeler, E., Lee, J., … Hayward, C. (2011). Catastrophizing, depression and pain-related disability. General Hospital Psychiatry, 33, 150–156.

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L. F., & Russell, J. A. (1998). Independence and bipolarity in the structure of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 967–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchette, I., & Richards, A. (2010). The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgement, decision making and reasoning. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 561–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, F. M., Marchb, L. M., Nicholasa, M. K., & Cousins, M. J. (2003). Chronic pain, work performance and litigation. Pain, 103, 41–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breivik, H., Collett, B., Ventafridda, V., Cohen, R., & Gallacher, D. (2006). Survey of chronic pain in Europe: Prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. European Journal of Pain, 10, 287–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brose, A., Schmiedek, F., Lövdén, M., & Lindenberger, U. (2012). Daily variability in working memory is coupled with negative affect: The role of attention and motivation. Emotion, 12, 605–617.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Bernston, G. G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 839–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J., Armitage, C. J., & Norman, P. (2009). Comparing implementation intention interventions in relation to young adults’ intake of fruit and vegetables. Psychology and Health, 24, 317–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Custers, R., & Aarts, H. (2005). Positive affect as implicit motivator: On the nonconscious operation of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 129–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. C., Okun, M. A., Kruszewski, D., Zautra, A. J., & Tennen, H. (2010). Sex differences in the relations of positive and negative daily events and fatigue in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Pain, 11, 1338–1347.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, H. J., Reneman, M. F., Groothoff, J. W., Geertzen, J. H., & Brouwer, S. (2013). Self-reported work ability and work performance in workers with chronic nonspecific musculoskeletal pain. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 23, 1–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, C. (2010). Applied missing data analysis (methodology in the social sciences). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbach, A., & Labroo, A. (2007). A. Be better or be merry: How mood affects self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 158–173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. H. (1987). Humans as self-constructing living systems: A developmental perspective on behavior and personality. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J. P. (2013). Don’t worry, be sad! On the cognitive, motivational, and interpersonal benefits of negative mood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 225–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J. (2014). Emotion regulation: Conceptual and empirical foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 5–6). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haase, C. M., Poulin, M. J., & Heckhausen, J. (2012). Happiness as a motivator: Positive affect predicts primary control striving for career and educational goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1093–1104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hagger, M. S., Lonsdale, A., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. (2011). Effectiveness of a brief intervention using mental simulations in reducing alcohol consumption in corporate employees. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 6, 375–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, N. A., Karoly, P., & Kitzman, H. (2004). Self-regulation and chronic pain: The role of emotion. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 28, 559–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inzlicht, M., Bartholow, B. D., & Hirsh, J. B. (2015). Emotional foundations of cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 126–132.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. P., & Karoly, P. (2011). Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults. In D. C. Turk & R. Melzack (Eds.), Handbook of pain assessment (pp. 19–41). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannes, C. B., Le, T. K., Zhou, X., & Johnston, J. A. (2010). The prevalence of chronic pain in United States adults: Results of an internet-based survey. Journal of Pain, 11, 1230–1239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kappes, H. B., Oettingen, G., Mayer, D., & Maglio, S. (2011). Sad mood promotes self-initiated mental contrasting of future and reality. Emotion, 11, 1206–1222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karoly, P. (1999). A goal systems-self-regulatory perspective on personality, psychopathology, and change. Review of General Psychology, 3, 264–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karoly, P. (2010). Goal systems and self-regulation: An individual differences perspective. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 218–242). Malden, MA: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Karoly, P., Okun, M. A., Enders, C., & Tennen, H. (2014). Effects of pain intensity on goal schemas and goal pursuit: A daily diary study. Health Psychology, 33, 968–976.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Karoly, P., & Ruehlman, L. S. (1995). Goal cognition and its clinical implications: Development and preliminary validation of four motivational assessment instruments. Assessment, 2, 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karoly, P., Ruehlman, L. S., & Okun, M. A. (2013). Psychosocial and demographic correlates of employment vs disability status in a national community sample of adults with chronic pain: Toward a psychology of pain presenteeism. Pain Medicine, 14, 1698–1707.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Principals and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luszczynska, A. (2006). An implementation intentions intervention, the use of a planningstrategy, and physical activity after myocardial infarction. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 900–908.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peugh, J. L. (2010). A practical guide to multilevel modeling. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 85–112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Zhang, Z., & Zyphur, M. J. (2011). Alternative methods for assessing mediation in multilevel data: The advantages of multilevel SEM. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 161–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15, 209–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruehlman, L. S., Karoly, P., Newton, C., & Aiken, L. S. (2005). The development and preliminary validation of a brief measure of chronic pain impact for use in the general population. Pain, 113, 82–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 3–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seebach, C. L., Kirkhart, M., Lating, J. M., Wegener, S. T., Song, Y., Riley, L. H., & Archer, K. R. (2012). Examining the role of positive and negative affect in recovery from spine surgery. Pain, 153, 518–525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sturgeon, J. A., Zautra, A. J., & Arewasikporn, A. (2014). A multilevel structural equation modeling analysis of vulnerabilities and resilience resources influencing affective adaptation to chronic pain. Pain, 155, 292–298.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. J. L., Stanish, W., Waite, H., Sullivan, M., & Tripp, D. A. (1998). Catastrophizing, pain, and disability in patients with soft-tissue injuries. Pain, 77, 253–260.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, R. W., & Bombardier, C. (2001). Employment-related factors in chronic pain and chronic pain disability. Clinical Journal of Pain, 17, 39–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennen, H., Affleck, G., & Armeli, S. (2003). Daily processes in health and illness. In J. Suls & K. Wallston (Eds.), Social foundations of health and illness (pp. 495–529). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tofighi, D., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2011). RMediation: An R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 692–700.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, M. T., Blyth, F. M., March, L. M., Nicholas, M. K., & Cousins, M. J. (2006). Chronic pain and reduced work effectiveness: The hidden cost to Australian employers. European Journal of Pain, 10, 161–166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule: Expanded form. Iowa City: University of Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., & Tellegen, A. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 820–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Source of funding

Paul Karoly is a co-developer of the Profile of Chronic Pain: Screen used in the present study. This research was supported in part by the National Institute of Nursing Research Grant 5-R21NR010752-02 awarded to Paul Karoly and Morris Okun.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chung Jung Mun.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Chung Jung Mun, Paul Karoly, Morris A. Okun, Hanjoe Kim and Howard Tennen declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights and Informed consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mun, C.J., Karoly, P., Okun, M.A. et al. Affect, work-goal schemas, and work-goal striving among adults with chronic pain: a multilevel structural equation analysis. J Behav Med 39, 288–299 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-015-9696-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-015-9696-4

Keywords

Navigation