“We get what we deserve”: the belief in a just world and its health consequences for Blacks
- 654 Downloads
This study explored whether individual differences in the endorsement of the belief that the world is a just place (i.e., the just world belief) would predict individual differences in resilience/vulnerability to the negative health consequences of discrimination. One-hundred and thirty Blacks participated in a vital check and completed a computer-based questionnaire that included measures of the just world belief, perceived discrimination, physical and mental health, and the presence/absence of chronic illnesses. Endorsement of the just world belief was not associated with self-reported physical/mental health; however, it moderated the effects of perceived discrimination on the number of chronic illnesses and systolic blood pressure. These findings suggest that Blacks who believe that the world is a just place where they get what they deserve may be at a particularly higher risk for the negative health consequences of discrimination. Theoretical and clinical implications of the findings are discussed.
KeywordsBlacks Perceived discrimination Health disparities The just world belief Individual differences
Conflict of Interest
Nao Hagiwara, Courtney J. Alderson and Jessica M. McCauley declared that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
All procedures followed were in accordance with ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
- Blascovich, J. (2008). Challenge, threat, and health. In J. Y. Shah & W. L. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 481–493). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Bost, J. E., Williams, B. A., Bottegal, M. T., Dang, Q., & Rubio, D. M. (2007). The 8-item Short-Form Health Survey and the physical comfort composite score of the quality of recovery 40-item scale provide the most responsive assessments of pain, physical function, and mental function during the first 4 days after ambulatory knee surgery with regional anesthesia. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 105, 1693–1700. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000287659.14893.65 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dover, T. L., Major, B., Kunstman, J. W., & Sawyer, P. J. (2015). Does unfairness feel different if it can be linked to group membership? Cognitive, affective, behavioral and physiological implications of discrimination and unfairness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 96–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fiske, S. T. (2002). Five core social motives, plus or minus five. In S. J. Spencer, S. Fein, M. P. Zanna, & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Motivated social perception: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 9, pp. 878–902). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Hafer, C. L., & Choma, B. L. (2009). Belief in a just world, perceived fairness, and justification of the status quo. In J. Jost, A. C. Kay, & H. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 107–125). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Haritatos, J., Mahalingam, R., & James, S. A. (2007). John Henryism, self-reported physical health indicators, and the mediating role of perceived stress among high socio-economic status Asian immigrants. Social Science and Medicine, 64, 1192–1203. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.10.037 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Peach, J. M., Laurin, K., Friesen, J., Zanna, M. P., et al. (2009). Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to see the way things are as the way they should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 421–434. doi: 10.1037/a0015997 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krieger, N., & Berkman, L. F. (2000). Discrimination and health: Social epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Logan, J. G., Barksdale, D. J., & Chien, L. C. (2014). Exploring moderating effects of John Henryism active coping on the relationship between education and cardiovascular measures in Korean Americans. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 77, 552–557. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.08.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 293–355). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
- Murphy, S. L., Xu, J., & Kochanek, K. D. (2013). Deaths: Final data for 2010. National vital statistics reports: From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System, 61, 1–117.Google Scholar
- Pittman, T. S., & Zeigler, K. R. (2007). Basic human needs. In A. W. Kruglanski & T. E. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 473–489). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Ryan, A. M., Gee, G. C., & Laflamme, D. F. (2006). The association between self-reported discrimination, physical health and blood pressure: Findings from African Americans, Black immigrants, and Latino immigrants in New Hampshire. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 17, 116–132.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smedley, B. D., Stith, A. Y., & Nelson, A. R. (2003). Unequal treatment: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Subramanyam, M. A., James, S. A., Diez-Roux, A. V., Hickson, D. A., Sarpong, D., Sims, M., et al. (2013). Socioeconomic status, John Henryism and blood pressure among African-Americans in the Jackson Heart Study. Social Science and Medicine, 93, 139–146. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.016 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., Dewey, J. E., & Gandek, B. (2001). How to score and interpret single-item health status measures: A manual for users of the SF-8 health survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.Google Scholar