Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 305–317 | Cite as

The interplay of dyadic and individual planning of pelvic-floor exercise in prostate-cancer patients following radical prostatectomy

  • Silke Burkert
  • Nina Knoll
  • Aleksandra Luszczynska
  • Oliver Gralla


This study broadens the current understanding of the role of planning by focusing on the interplay between individual and dyadic planning (i.e. making plans about the target person’s behaviour together with a partner). Self-report data from N = 141 prostatectomy-patients and their partners were assessed at three times within 1 year post-surgery. Direct and indirect effects of dyadic and individual planning on patients’ pelvic-floor exercise (PFE) were tested. Proposed mediators were social support, social control, and action control. Cross-sectionally, the dyadic planning–PFE relationship was mediated by patients’ received support and partners’ provided social control. Longitudinally, mediators of dyadic planning were partners’ provided social control and support. Effects of individual planning on PFE were mediated by action control at baseline only. Also, at lower levels of individual planning, patients’ dyadic planning was more strongly associated with receipt of social control. Results underscore the importance of social factors in the planning process and its mechanisms in health-behaviour change.


Dyadic planning Social exchange processes Self-regulation Health-behaviour change Multiple mediation 


  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Arbuckle, J. L. (2009). AMOS 18 user’s guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Basillote, J. B., Ahlering, T. E., Skarecky, D. W., Lee, D. I., & Clayman, R. V. (2004). Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Review and assessment of an emerging technique. Surgical Endoscopy, 18, 1694–1711.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumeister, R. F., & Heatherton, T. F. (1996). Self-regulation failure: An overview. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benyamini, Y., Ashery, L., & Shiloh, S. (2011). Involving husbands in their wives’ health behaviour: Does it work? Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3, 66–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berkman, L. F., Glass, T., Brissette, I., & Seeman, T. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millenium. Social Science and Medicine, 51, 843–857.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolger, N., & Amarel, D. (2007). Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 458–475.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brunstein, J. C., Dangelmayer, G., & Schultheiss, O. C. (1996). Personal goals and social support in close relationships: Effects on relationship mood and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1006–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burkert, S., Knoll, N., Scholz, U., Roigas, J., & Gralla, O. (2011). Dyadic planning as a social and self-regulatory strategy for health behaviour change: A randomized-controlled planning intervention. Social Science and Medicine, 73, 783–792.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2002). Control processes and self-organization as complementary principles underlying behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 304–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, S. (1988). Psychosocial models of the role of support in the etiology of physical disease. Health Psychology, 7, 269–297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dorey, G., Glazener, C., Buckley, B., Cochrane, C., & Moore, K. (2009). Developing a pelvic floor muscle training regimen for use in a trial intervention. Physiotherapy, 95, 199–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dunkel-Schetter, C., Blasband, D. E., Feinstein, L. G., & Herbert, T. B. (1992). Elements of supportive interactions: Where are attempts to help effective? In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.), Helping and being helped: Naturalistic studies (pp. 83–114). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Dunkel-Schetter, C., & Skokan, L. A. (1990). Determinants of social support provision in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 437–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Emmons, R. A., & King, L. A. (1988). Conflict among personal strivings: Immediate and long-term implications for psychological and physical well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1040–1048.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferlay, J., Bray, F., Pisani, P., & Parkin, D. M. (2001). GLOBOCAN 2000: Cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence worldwide, Version 1.0, IARC CancerBase No. 5. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer and World Health Organization, IARC Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fleig, L., Lippke, S., Pomp, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2011). Intervention effects of exercise self-regulation on physical exercise and eating fruits and vegetables: A longitudinal study in orthopedic and cardiac rehabilitation. Preventive Medicine, 53, 182–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Glass, T. A. (2000). Psychosocial intervention. In L. F. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 267–305). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hahlweg, K. (1996). Fragebogen zur Partnerschaftsdiagnostik [Relationship Questionnaire]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  21. Hunter, K. F., Moore, K. N., & Glazener, C. M. A. (2007). Conservative management for prostatectomy urinary incontinence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2, 1–56.Google Scholar
  22. Karantanis, E., Fynes, M., Moore, K. H., & Stanton, S. L. (2004). Comparison of the ICIQ-SF and 24 hour pad test with other measures for evaluating the severity of urodynamic stress incontinence. International Urogynecology Journal of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, 15, 111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Knoll, N., Burkert, S., Kramer, J., Roigas, J., & Gralla, O. (2009a). Relationship satisfaction and erectile functions in men receiving laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Effects of pro-vision and receipt of spousal support. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 1438–1450.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knoll, N., Burkert, S., Roigas, J., & Gralla, O. (2011). Changes in reciprocal support provision and need-based support from partners of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Social Science and Medicine, 73, 308–315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knoll, N., Burkert, S., Scholz, U., Roigas, J., & Gralla, O. (in press). The dual-effects model of social control revisited: Relationship satisfaction as a moderator. Anxiety, Stress & Coping. doi:10.1080/10615806.2011.584188.
  26. Knoll, N., Scholz, U., Burkert, S., Roigas, J., & Gralla, O. (2009b). Effects of received and mobilized support on recipients’ and providers’ self-efficacy beliefs: A one-year follow-up study with patients receiving radical prostatectomy and their spouses. International Journal of Psychology, 44, 129–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lewis, M. A., & Rook, K. S. (1999). Social control in personal relationships: Impact on health behaviors and psychological distress. Health Psychology, 18, 63–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luszczynska, A., Sarkar, Y., & Knoll, N. (2007). Received social support, self-efficacy, and finding benefits in being HIV-infected as predictors of adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Patient Education and Counseling, 66, 37–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Luszczynska, A., & Schwarzer, R. (2003). Planning and self-efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of breast self-examination: A longitudinal study on self-regulatory cognitions. Psychology and Health, 18, 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. MacDonald, R., Fink, H. A., Huckabay, C., Monga, M., & Wilt, T. J. (2007). Pelvic-floor muscle training to improve urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: A systematic review of effectiveness. British Journal Urology International, 100, 76–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martire, L. M., Stephens, M. A. P., & Schulz, R. (2011). Independence centrality as a moderator of the effects of spousal support on patient well-being and physical functioning. Health Psychology, 30, 651–655.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Prestwich, A., Conner, M., Lawton, R., Bailey, W., Litman, J., & Molyneaux, V. (2005). Individual and collaborative implementation intentions and the promotion of breast self-examination. Psychology and Health, 20, 743–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roumeguere, T., Bollens, R., Van den Bossche, M., Rochet, D., Bialek, D., Hoffman, P., et al. (2003). Radical prostatectomy: A prospective comparison of oncological and functional results between open and laparoscopic approaches. World Journal of Urology, 20, 360–366.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Schwarzer, R., & Knoll, N. (2007). Functional roles of social support within the stress and coping process: A theoretical and empirical overview. International Journal of Psychology, 42, 243–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schwarzer, R., Luszczynska, A., Ziegelmann, J. P., Scholz, U., & Sniehotta, F. F. (2008). Social-cognitive predictors of physical exercise adherence: Three longitudinal studies in rehabilitation. Health Psychology, 28, S54–S63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sheeran, P., Webb, T. L., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2005). The interplay between goal intentions and implementation intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 87–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sniehotta, F. F., Nagy, G., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2006). The role of action control in implementing intentions during the first weeks of behaviour change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 87–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sniehotta, F. F., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). Bridging the intention-behavior gap: Planning, self-efficacy, and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise. Psychology and Health, 20, 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290–312). Washington DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  41. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  42. Thrasher, J. F., Campbell, M. K., & Oates, V. (2004). Behavior-specific social support for healthy behaviors among African American church members: Applying optimal matching theory. Health Education & Behavior, 31, 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tucker, J. S., Orlando, M., Elliott, M. N., & Klein, D. J. (2006). Affective and behavioral rseponse to health-related social control. Health Psychology, 25, 715–722.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2007). How do implementation intentions promote goal attainment? A test of component processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silke Burkert
    • 1
  • Nina Knoll
    • 1
    • 2
  • Aleksandra Luszczynska
    • 3
    • 4
  • Oliver Gralla
    • 5
  1. 1.Institute of Medical PsychologyCharité, Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Freie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Warsaw School of Social Sciences and HumanitiesWarsawPoland
  4. 4.Trauma, Health, and Hazards CenterUniversity of ColoradoColorado SpringsUSA
  5. 5.Urologie am RingCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations