Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 387–392 | Cite as

Multiple plans and memory performance: results of a randomized controlled trial targeting fruit and vegetable intake

  • Amelie U. Wiedemann
  • Sonia Lippke
  • Ralf Schwarzer
Article

Abstract

To test whether forming and memorizing more action plans has larger effects than generating fewer plans. In a randomized controlled trial with five intervention groups and one control group, 478 participants were asked to form one, two, three, four, or five action plans, or to complete questionnaires only (control group). One week later, behavior change was measured and participants of the intervention groups completed a free recall task. Outcome measures are daily intake of fruit and vegetables as well as recall of plans. Fruit and vegetable intake increased with higher numbers of plans, and was significantly larger in groups that formed four (d = 0.36) or five plans (d = 0.48) as compared to controls. The sum of recalled plans reflected the number of generated plans, but was unrelated to behavior change. Generating multiple plans benefits behavior change, but to be implemented they need not be recalled.

Keywords

Action plan Implementation intention Randomized controlled trial Healthy nutrition Health behavior change 

Supplementary material

10865_2011_9364_MOESM1_ESM.doc (50 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 51 kb)

References

  1. Chapman, J., Armitage, C. J., & Norman, P. (2009). Comparing implementation intention interventions in relation to young adults’ intake of fruit and vegetables. Psychology & Health, 24, 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cohen, A.-L., Jaudas, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). Number of cues influence the cost of remembering to remember. Memory & Cognition, 36, 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Elliott, M. A., & Armitage, C. J. (2006). Effects of implementation intentions on the self-reported frequency of drivers’ compliance with speed limits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 108–117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Godin, G., Sheeran, P., Conner, M., & Germain, M. (2008). Asking questions changes behavior: Mere measurement effects on frequency of blood donation. Health Psychology, 27, 179–184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Brandstätter, V. (1997). Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 186–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 70–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lippke, S., Ziegelmann, J. P., & Schwarzer, R. (2004). Initiation and maintenance of physical exercise: Stage-specific effects of a planning intervention. Research in Sports Medicine, 12, 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Luszczynska, A., Tryburcy, M., & Schwarzer, R. (2007). Improving fruit and vegetable consumption: A self-efficacy intervention compared to a combined self-efficacy and planning intervention. Health Education Research, 22, 630–638.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Michie, S., Dormandy, E., & Marteau, T. (2004). Increasing screening uptake amongst those intending to be screened: The use of action plans. Patient Education and Counseling, 55, 218–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Milne, S., Orbell, S., & Sheeran, P. (2002). Combining motivational and volitional interventions to promote exercise participation: Protection motivation theory and implementation intentions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 163–184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods, 7, 105–125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Prestwich, A., Perugini, M., & Hurling, R. (2010). Can implementation intentions and text messages promote brisk walking? A randomized trial. Health Psychology, 29, 40–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Smith, R. E., & Bayen, U. J. (2004). A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 756–777.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sniehotta, F. F., Schwarzer, R., Scholz, U., & Schüz, B. (2005). Action planning and coping planning for long-term lifestyle change: Theory and assessment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 565–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stadler, G., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G. (2010). Intervention effects of information and self-regulation on eating fruits and vegetables over 2 years. Health Psychology, 29, 274–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Steptoe, A., Perkins-Porras, L., McKay, C., Rink, E., Hilton, S., & Cappuccio, F. P. (2003). Psychological factors associated with fruit and vegetable intake and with biomarkers in adults from a low-income neighborhood. Health Psychology, 22, 148–155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. van Osch, L., Lechner, L., Reubsaet, A., & de Vries, H. (2010). From theory to practice: An explorative study into the instrumentality and specificity of implementation intentions. Psychology & Health, 25, 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Webb, T. L. (2006). Getting things done: Self-regulatory processes in goal pursuit. Social Psychological Review, 8, 2–13.Google Scholar
  19. Wiedemann, A. U., Lippke, S., Reuter, T., Ziegelmann, J. P., & Schüz, B. (2011a). The more the better? The number of plans predicts health behaviour. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3, 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wiedemann, A. U., Lippke, S., Reuter, T., Ziegelmann, J. P., & Schwarzer, R. (2011b). How planning facilitates behaviour change: Additive and interactive effects of a randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. World Health Organization. (2003). Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: WHO technical report (Vol. 916). Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amelie U. Wiedemann
    • 1
  • Sonia Lippke
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ralf Schwarzer
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of Medical Psychology, Charité—Universitaetsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Jacobs Center on Lifelong Learning and Institutional DevelopmentJacobs University BremenBremenGermany
  3. 3.Department of Health PromotionUniversiteit MaastrichtMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of Health PsychologyFreie Universitaet Berlin and Warsaw School of Social Sciences and HumanitiesBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations