The Life Engagement Test: Assessing Purpose in Life

  • Michael F. Scheier
  • Carsten Wrosch
  • Andrew Baum
  • Sheldon Cohen
  • Lynn M. Martire
  • Karen A. Matthews
  • Richard Schulz
  • Bozena Zdaniuk
Article

This article describes a 6-item scale, the Life Engagement Test, designed to measure purpose in life, defined in terms of the extent to which a person engages in activities that are personally valued. Psychometric data are presented including information about the scale's factor structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, discriminant predictive validity, and norms. The data suggest that the Life Engagement Test is psychometrically sound across different gender, age, and ethnic groups and is appropriate for wider use. Discussion centers on the use of the Life Engagement Test in behavioral medicine and health psychology research and recent associations that have begun to emerge between the scale and health-relevant outcomes.

KEYWORDS

purpose in life life engagement assessment factor structure psychometrics 

References

  1. Andresen, E. M., Malmgren, J. A., Carter, W. B., and Patrick, D. L. (1994). Screening for depression in well older adults: Evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale). Am. J. Prev. Med. 10: 77–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An Introduction to Motivation. Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  3. Barefoot, K. C., Dodge, K. A., Peterson, B. L., Dahlstrom, W. G., and Williams, R. B. (1989). The Cook-Medley Hostility Scale: Item content and ability to predict survival. Psychosom. Med. 62: 17–25.Google Scholar
  4. Buysse, D. J., Reynolds, C. F., Monk, T. H., Berman, S. R., and Kupfer, D. J. (1989). The Pittsburgh sleep quality index. Psychiatry. Res. 28: 193–213.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Carver, C. S., and Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and Self-regulation: A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior. Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Carver, C. S., and Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychol. Rev. 97: 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carver, C. S., and Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the Self Regulation of Behavior. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, S., Doyle, W. J., Skoner, D. P., Rabin, B. S., and Gwaltney, J. M. (1997). Social ties and susceptibility to the common cold. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 277: 1940–1944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., and Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. J. Health. Soc. Behav. 24: 385–396.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R., Kamarck, T., and Hoberman, H. (1985). Measuring the functional components of social support. In Sarason, I. G., and Sarason, B. (Eds.), Social Support: Theory, Research and Applications, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 73–94.Google Scholar
  11. Cook, W. W., and Medley, D. M. (1954). Proposed hostility and pharisaic-virtue scales for the MMPI. J. Appl. Psychol. 38: 414–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Derogatis, L. R., and Melisaratos, N. (1983). The brief symptom inventory: An introductory report. Psychol. Med. 13: 595–605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larson, R. J., and Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. J. Pers. Assess. 49: 71–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Feather, N. T. (Ed.). (1982). Expectations and Actions: Expect-ancy-Value Models in Psychology. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  15. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychol. Assess. 4: 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaplan, R. M. (1990). Behavior as the central outcome in health care. Am. Psychol. 45: 1211–1220.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Locke, H., and Wallace, K. (1959). Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage Fam. Living 21: 251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Matthews, K. A., Owens, J. F., Edmunowicz, D., and Kuller, L. H. (2005). Positive and negative affect/cognitions and risk for coronary and aortic calcification in healthy women. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
  19. Pearlin, L. I., and Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping. J. Health. Soc. Behav. 19: 2–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 1: 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  22. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 57: 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., and Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A re-evaluation of the Life Orientation Test. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67: 1063–1078.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Shah, J., and Higgins, E. T. (1997). Expectancy X value effects: Regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and direction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 73: 447–458.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Shrout, P. E., and Yager, T. J. (1989). Reliability and validity of screening scales: Effect of reducing scale length. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 42: 69–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Spielberger, C. D., et al. (1985). The experience and expression of anger: Construction and validation of an anger expression scale. In Chesney, M. A., and Rosenman, R. H. (Eds.), Anger and Hostility in Cardiovascular and Behavioral Disorders. Hemisphere, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  27. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and Motivation. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Ware, J. E., Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med. Care 30: 473–483.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., and Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54: 1063–1070.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Wrosch, C., Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., and Schulz, R. (2003a). The importance of goal disengagement in adaptive self-regulation: When giving up is beneficial. Self Identity 2: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wrosch, C., Scheier, M. F., Miller, G. E., Schulz, R., and Carver, C. S. (2003b). Adaptive self-regulation of unattainable goals: Goal disengagement, goal re-engagement, and subjective well-being. Per. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 29: 1494– 1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael F. Scheier
    • 1
  • Carsten Wrosch
    • 2
  • Andrew Baum
    • 3
  • Sheldon Cohen
    • 4
  • Lynn M. Martire
    • 3
  • Karen A. Matthews
    • 3
  • Richard Schulz
    • 3
  • Bozena Zdaniuk
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Concordia UniversityQuebecCanada
  3. 3.University of PittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
  4. 4.Carnegie Mellon UniversityPennsylvaniaUSA

Personalised recommendations