Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Brief Training Plus Electronic Feedback on Increasing Quantity and Intonation of Behavior Specific Praise Among Preschool Teachers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a brief training plus e-mail-specific performance feedback (ESPF) on increasing preschool teacher’s use of behavior-specific praise (BSP) statements. Quantity of BSP was measured using a frequency count, while voice intonation of BSP statements was measured using a voice recording system. A multiple probe design across four preschool teachers who taught in inclusive preschool classrooms was used to evaluate the effectiveness of ESPF on BSP delivery. As an outcome measure, researchers examined whether changes to the teacher’s BSP affected children’s task engagement during class activities. Results indicated a functional relation between ESPF and an increase in the quantity of BSP statements. Voice intonation of BSP statements increased for three participants following ESPF; however, a clear functional relation was not present in the data. Results also indicated that increased quantity and intonation of BSP statements resulted in a tendency for increased mean task engagement across all children; this finding may warrant further investigation. Limitations and future research directions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allday, R. A., Neilsen-Gatti, S., Hinkson-Lee, K., Hudson, T., Kleinke, A., & Russel, C. S. (2012). Training general educators to increase behavior-specific praise: Effects on students with EBD. Behavioral Disorders, 37, 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, E. E., Fuller, E., & Schnitz, A. (2016). The use of email to coach preservice early childhood teachers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 36, 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, E. E., Lloyd, B. P., Spriggs, A. D., & Gast, D. L. (2018a). Visual analysis of graphic data. In J. R. Ledford & D. L. Gast (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed., pp. 215–238). New York, NY, US: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, E. E., Pokorski, E. A., Gossett, S., Sweeney, E., Qiu, J., & Choi, G. (2018b). The use of email to coach early childhood teachers. Journal of Early Intervention, 40, 212–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, E. E., Pribble, L., & Chen, C. I. (2013). The use of e-mail to deliver performance-based feedback to early childhood practitioners. Journal of Early Intervention, 35, 270–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, E. E., & Wolery, M. (2007). Evaluation of e-mail feedback on the verbal behaviors of pre-service teachers. Journal of Early Intervention, 30, 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, M. E., Cannella-Malone, H. I., Seaman, R. L., Andzik, N. R., Schaefer, J. M., Page, E. J., et al. (2017). Findings across practitioner training studies in special education: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 84, 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144-29176980008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanaugh, B. (2013). Performance feedback and teachers’ use of praise and opportunities to respond: A review of the literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 36, 111–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, B. G., Cameron, D. L., & Tankersley, M. (2007). Inclusive teachers’ attitudinal ratings of their students with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 40, 230–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2009). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Division for Early Childhood. (2014). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education 2014. Retrieved from http://www.dec-sped.org /recommendedpractices

  • Filcheck, H. A., McNeil, C. B., & Herschell, A. D. (2001). Types of verbal feedback that affect compliance and general behavior in disruptive and typical children. Child Study Journal, 31, 225–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, A. W., Wacker, D. P., & Boelter, E. W. (2009). An evaluation of the interaction between quality of attention and negative reinforcement with children who display escape-maintained problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 343–348.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gast, D. L., Lloyd, B. P., & Ledford, J. R. (2018). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In J. R. Ledford & D. L. Gast (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed., pp. 239–281). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grondin, S. (2008). Methods for studying psychological time. In S. Grondin (Ed.), Psychology of time (pp. 51–74). Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haydon, T., & Musti-Rao, S. (2011). Effective use of behavior-specific praise: A middle school case study. Beyond Behavior, 20, 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmeter, M. L., Snyder, P. A., Kinder, K., & Artman, K. (2011). Impact of performance feedback delivered via electronic mail on preschool teachers’ use of descriptive praise. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 96–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, Jl., & Funk, S. (2018). Promoting young children’s social and emotional health. Young Children, 73, 73–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, M., Akers, J., & Rivera, G. (2019). Use of behavioral skills training with teachers: A systematic review. Journal of Behavioral Education, 28(3), 344–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-019-09322-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klofstad, C. A., Nowicki, S., & Anderson, R. C. (2016). How voice pitch influences our choice of leaders. The American Scientist, 104(5), 282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1511/2016.122.282. Retrieved from https://www.americanscientist.org/article/how-voice-pitch-influences-our-choice-of-leaders

  • Ledford, J. R., Lane, J. D., & Gast, D. L. (2018a). Dependent variables, measurement, and reliability. In D. L. Gast & J. R. Ledford (Eds.), Single case research methodology (pp. 97–131). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ledford, J. R., Lane, J. D., & Severini, K. E. (2018b). Structured visual analysis of single-case experimental design data. Brain Impairment, 19, 4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., Singer, G. G. S., & Gibson, M. (2005). The functional effect of teacher positive and neutral affect on task performance of students with significant disabilities. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7, 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathel, J. M., Drasgow, E., Brown, W. H., & Marshall, K. J. (2014). Increasing induction-level teachers’ positive-to-negative communication ratio and use of behavior-specific praise through e-mailed performance feedback and its effect on students’ task engagement. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16, 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinke, W., Lewis-Palmer, T., & Martin, E. (2007). The effect of visual performance feedback on teacher use of behavior-specific praise. Behavior Modification, 31, 247–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, S. H. (2003). Social skills training with children and young people: theory, evidence and practice. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 8, 84–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, K. S., Wehby, J. H., & Copeland, S. R. (2000). Effect of varying rates of behavior-specific praise on the on-task behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 2–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweigart, C. A., Collins, L. W., Evanovich, L. L., & Cook, S. C. (2016). An evaluation of the evidence base for performance feedback to improve teacher praise using CEC’s Quality Indicators. Education and Treatment of Children, 39, 419–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, A. P., Maruff, P., Snyder, P. J., & Mundt, J. C. (2009). Standardization of pitch range setting in voice acoustic analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 318–324.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Weyman, J. R., & Sy, J. R. (2018). Effects of neutral and enthusiastic praise on the rate of discrimination acquisition. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51, 335–344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Allan Allday.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to report for work associated with this article.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All procedures outlined in this article were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board of the authors’ home institution and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gorton, K., Allday, R.A., Lane, J.D. et al. Effects of Brief Training Plus Electronic Feedback on Increasing Quantity and Intonation of Behavior Specific Praise Among Preschool Teachers. J Behav Educ 31, 731–750 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-020-09427-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-020-09427-w

Keywords

Navigation