Aaron, P. G., Joshi, R. M., Gooden, R., & Bentum, K. E. (2008). Diagnosis and treatment of reading disabilities based on the componential model of reading: An alternative to the discrepancy model of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219407310838.
Abbott, R. D., Berninger, V. W., & Fayol, M. (2010). Longitudinal relationships of levels of language in writing and between writing and reading in grades 1 to 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019318.
August, D., McCardle, P., & Shanahan, T. (2014). Developing literacy in English language learners: Findings from a review of the experimental research. School Psychology Review, 43, 490–498. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-14-0088.1.
Baker, S. K., Lesaux, N., Jayanthi, M., Dimino, J., Proctor, C. P., Morris, J., Gersten, R., Haymond, K., Kieffer, M. J., Linan-Thompson, S., & Newman-Gonchar, R. (2014). Teaching academic content and literacy to English learners in elementary and middle school (NCEE 2014– 4012). Washington, DC.
Beck, I. L., & Beck, M. E. (2013). Making sense of phonics: The hows and whys. New York: Guilford.
Blevins, W. (1998). Phonics from A to Z: A practical guide. New York: Scholastic.
Bowers, J. S., & Bowers, P. N. (2017). Beyond phonics: The case for teaching children the logic of the English spelling system. Educational Psychologist, 52, 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1288571.
Briesch, A. M., & Chafouleas, S. M. (2009). Children’s usage rating profile (actual). Storrs: University of Connecticut.
Brossart, D. F., Laird, V. C., & Armstrong, T. W. (2018). Interpreting Kendall’s tau and tau-u for single-case experimental designs. Cogent Psychology, 5, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2018.1518687.
Burns, M. K., Riley-Tillman, T. C., & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2010). RTI applications: Academic and behavioral interventions (Vol. 1). New York: Guilford.
Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19, 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271.
Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2012). Effective reading programs for Spanish-dominant English language learners (ELLs) in the elementary grades: A synthesis of research. Review of Educational Research, 82, 351–395. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312465472.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2019). Common core state standards initiative: Preparing students for college and career. Retrieved May 27, 2019 from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/.
Daly, E. J., Neugebauer, S., Chafouleas, S., & Skinner, C. H. (2015). Interventions for reading problems: Designing and evaluating effective strategies. New York: Guilford.
Dewey, E. N., Kaminski, R. A., & Good, R. H. (2014). DIBELS next national norms 2012–2013 (Technical Report No. 17). Eugene: Dynamic Measurement Group.
Ehri, L. C. (2017). Orthographic mapping and literacy development revisited. In K. Cain, D. L. Compton, & R. K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 169–190). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 393–447. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071003393.
Foorman, B. R., Herrera, S., Petscher, Y., Mitchell, A., & Truckenmiller, A. (2015). The structure of oral language and reading and their relation to comprehension in Kindergarten through Grade 2. Reading and Writing, 28, 655–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9544-5.
Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1991). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57, 488–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299105700603.
García, J. R., & Cain, K. (2014). Decoding and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis to identify which reader and assessment characteristics influence the strength of the relationship in English. Review of Educational Research, 84, 74–111.
Gast, D. L., Lloyd, B. P., & Ledford, J. R. (2018). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In J. R. Ledford & D. L. Gast (Eds.), Single-case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (pp. 239–281). New York: Routledge.
Good, R. H., Kaminski, R. A., Dewey, E. N., Wallin, J., Powell-Smith, K. A., & Lattimer, R. J. (2013). DIBELS Next technical manual. Eugene: Dynamic Measurement Group, Inc. http://dibels.org.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104.
Gunn, B., Biglan, A., Smolkowski, K., & Ary, D. (2000). The efficacy of supplemental instruction in decoding skills for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students in early elementary school. The Journal of Special Education, 34(2), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246690003400204.
Hedges, L. V., & Pigott, T. D. (2004). The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 9, 426–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.426.
Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.486.
Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799.
Horner, R. D., & Baer, D. M. (1978). Multiple probe technique: A variation on the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-189.
Hulme, C., Bowyer-Crane, C., Carroll, J. M., Duff, F. J., & Snowling, M. J. (2012). The causal role of phoneme awareness and letter-sound knowledge in learning to read: Combining intervention studies with mediation analyses. Psychological Science, 23, 572–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611435921.
Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Kieffer, M. J., & Vukovic, R. K. (2012). Components and context: Exploring sources of reading difficulties for language minority learners and native English speakers in urban schools. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 433–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411432683.
Klingbeil, D. A., Van Norman, E. R., & Nelson, P. M. (2017). Precision of curriculum-based measurement reading data: Considerations for multiple-baseline designs. Journal of Behavioral Education, 26, 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-017-9282-7.
Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). What works clearinghouse: Single-case design technical documentation. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/ReferenceResources/wwc_scd.pdf.
Lane, J. D., & Gast, D. L. (2014). Visual analysis in single case experimental design studies: Brief review and guidelines. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24, 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2013.815636.
Ludwig, C., Guo, K., & Georgiou, G. K. (2019). Are reading interventions for English language learners effective? A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(3), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219419825855.
Mancilla-Martinez, J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2017). Early indicators of later English reading comprehension outcomes among children from Spanish-speaking homes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21, 428–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1320402.
McCandliss, B., Beck, I. L., Sandak, R., & Perfetti, C. (2003). Focusing attention on decoding for children with poor reading skills: Design and preliminary tests of the word building intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 75–104. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0701_05.
Moore, B. A., & Klingner, J. K. (2014). Considering the needs of English language learner populations: An examination of the population validity of reading intervention research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(5), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412466702.
Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.273.
R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
Richards-Tutor, C., Baker, D. L., Gersten, R., Baker, S. K., & Smith, J. M. (2016). The effectiveness of reading interventions for English learners: A research synthesis. Exceptional Children, 82, 144–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915585483.
Skinner, C. H. (2013). Contextual validity: Knowing what works is necessary but not sufficient. The School Psychologist, 61, 14–21.
Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Davis, S., & Madden, N. A. (2011). Effective programs for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Educational Research Review, 6, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.07.002.
Snyder, E., Witmer, S. E., & Schmitt, H. (2017). English language learners and reading instruction: A review of the literature. Preventing School Failure, 61, 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2016.1219301.
Stanley, C. T., Petscher, Y., & Catts, H. (2018). A longitudinal investigation of direct and indirect links between reading skills in kindergarten and reading comprehension in tenth grade. Reading and Writing, 31, 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9777-6.
Suggate, S. P. (2016). A meta-analysis of the long-term effects of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, and reading comprehension interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 77–96.
Tarlow, K. R. (2016). Baseline corrected tau calculator. http://www.ktarlow.com/stats/tau.
Tarlow, K. R. (2017). An improved rank correlation effect size statistic for single-case designs: Baseline corrected tau. Behavior Modification, 41, 427–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445516676750.
Valentine, J. C., Pigott, T. D., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). How many studies do you need? A primer on statistical power for meta-analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35, 215–247. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998609346961.
Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., Capin, P., Miciak, J., Cho, E., & Fletcher, J. M. (2019). How initial word reading and language skills affect reading comprehension outcomes for students with reading disabilities. Exceptional Children, 85, 180–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918782618.
Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48.