Exploring Procedural Manipulations to Enhance Student Performance on SAFMEDS in Undergraduate Introduction to Behavior Analysis Courses

Abstract

Research into the fluency-building tactic named Say All Fast Minute Every Day Shuffled (SAFMEDS) has implications for instruction at all academic levels. Several researchers have studied the effects of SAFMEDS in undergraduate courses; however, not all of the salient variables, or the relationships among variables, have been fully analyzed. The numerous procedural variations may pose specific challenges for college instructors who wish to implement SAFMEDS in their course design or for students who are attempting to use SAFMEDS on their own. We collected behavioral data across four semesters of undergraduate introductory behavior analysis courses. The effects of two procedural manipulations were evaluated in relation to undergraduate students’ performance frequencies on weekly checkouts with two or four decks of see term/say definition SAFMEDS. The authors describe how SAFMEDS were implemented and modified over the course of four semesters of instruction. SAFMEDS’ procedures were modified each semester based on student outcomes in the prior semester in an effort to improve our student outcomes and to assist other course instructors who might wish to utilize SAFMEDS in their university courses. An overview of the decision-making process and student outcomes allows for the authors to make recommendations for course instructors who employ SAFMEDS in their courses and suggestions for future research to improve our understanding of how SAFMEDS affect student performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Cihon et al. (2017) for a detailed description of the course components.

  2. 2.

    SAFMEDS cards are available by contacting the second author.

References

  1. Adams, O., Cihon, T. M., Urbina, T., & Goodhue, R. J. (2017). The comparative effects of cumulative and unitary SAFMEDS terms in an introductory undergraduate behavior analysis course. European Journal of Behavior Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2017.1404394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 163–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03393163.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cihon, T. M., Kieta, A., & Glenn, S. (2017). Teaching behavior analysis with behavior analysis: 30 years of a work in progress. European Journal of Behavior Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2017.1404393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cihon, T. M., Sturtz, A. M., & Eshleman, J. (2012). The effects of instructor-provided or student created flashcards with weekly, one-minute timings on unit quiz scores in introduction to applied behavior analysis courses. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 13, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2012.11434404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper, J. O. (2000). Tutoring Joe: Winning with the precision teaching team. In W. L. Heward (Ed.), Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (6th ed., pp. 268–270). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eshleman, J. W. (1985). Improvement pictures with low celerations: An early foray into the use of SAFMEDS. Journal of Precision Teaching, 6, 54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fabrizio, M., & Moors, A. (2003). Evaluating mastery: Measuring instructional outcomes for children with autism. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 4, 23–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2003.11434213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goodhue, R. J., Liu, S. C., & Cihon, T. M. (2019). An alternative to non-human laboratory experiences for students of behavior analysis: The Portable Operant Research and Teaching Laboratory (PORTL). Journal of Behavioral Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-019-09323-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Graf, S. A., & Auman, J. (2005). SAFMEDS: A tool to build fluency. Poland, OH: Graf Implements.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heward, W. L. (1997). Four validated instructional strategies. Behavior and Social Issues, 7, 43–49. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v7i1.298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson, K., & Street, E. M. (2012). From the laboratory to the field and back again: Morningside Academy’s 32 years of improving students’ academic performance. The Behavior Analyst Today, 13, 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kubina, R. M., & Yurich, K. K. L. (2012). The precision teaching book. Lemont, PA: Greatness Achieved Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ledoux, S. F. (2014). Running out of time: Introducing behaviorology to help solve global problems. Ottawa, ON: BehaveTech Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lindsley, O. (2000). Celeration and agility for the 2000s. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 17, 107–111.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mason, L. L., Rivera, C. J., & Arriaga, A. (2017). The effects of an avoidance contingency on postsecondary student SAFMEDS performance. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 19, 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2017.1418125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Meindl, J. N., Ivy, J. W., Miller, N., Neef, N. A., & Williamson, R. L. (2013). An examination of stimulus control in fluency-based strategies: SAFMEDS and generalization. Journal of Behavioral Education, 22, 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-013-9172-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Neef, N. A., Cihon, T. M., Kettering, T., Guld, A., Axe, J., Itoi, M., et al. (2007). A comparison of study session formats on attendance and quiz performance in a college course. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-006-9037-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Quigley, S. P., Peterson, S. M., Frieder, J. E., & Peck, K. M. (2018). A review of SAFMEDS: Evidence for procedures, outcomes and directions for future research. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 41, 283–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2016). Test enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stockwell, F., & Eshleman, J. (2010). A case study using SAFMEDS to promote fluency with skinner’s verbal behavior terms. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 26, 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Twyman, J. S., & Heward, W. L. (2018). How to improve student learning in every classroom now. International Journal of Education Research, 87, 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. US Department of Education. (2008). Structure of US Education. Retrieved March 6, 2018, from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ous/international/usnei/us/edlite-structure-us.html.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Owen Adams, Rob J. Goodhue, Michaela Smith, and the members of the Teaching Science Lab at the University of North Texas for their assistance with the data collected for this manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Traci M. Cihon.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Urbina, T., Cihon, T.M. & Baltazar, M. Exploring Procedural Manipulations to Enhance Student Performance on SAFMEDS in Undergraduate Introduction to Behavior Analysis Courses. J Behav Educ 30, 130–148 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-019-09359-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • College teaching
  • Precision teaching
  • SAFMEDS
  • Undergraduates