Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of Interactive Computerized Training to Teach Paraprofessionals to Implement Errorless Discrete Trial Instruction

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Efficient and effective training strategies for paraprofessionals in special education settings face many challenges. Interactive computerized training (ICT)—a self-paced program that incorporates audio narration, video models, interactive activities, and competency checks—is one potential solution. ICT has been successful in training college students and special education teachers to implement discrete trial instruction (DTI), but its effectiveness to train paraprofessionals is unknown. Using a multiple-baseline design, we evaluated the feasibility of ICT, to train six paraprofessionals to implement DTI with an errorless learning procedure. Following ICT, the fidelity of implementation of DTI increased for all participants when implemented with a student in their classroom; however, competency varied. We added additional training components that progressed from low to more intensive feedback delivered remotely in attempt to increase fidelity to 90% or higher implementation. We also evaluated generalization to novel instructional programs and maintenance of instruction in the absence of feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boomer, L. W. (1994). The utilization of paraprofessionals in programs for students with autism. Focus on Autism and other Developmental Disabilities, 9, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/108835769400900201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, D., Elliffe, D., & DiGennaro Reed, F. D. (2017). Using sequential analysis to assess component integrity of discrete-trial teaching programs. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 19, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2017.1404392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, J. E., Nicolson, A. C., & Higbee, T. S. (2000). Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context. Journal of Applied Behaviors Analysis, 33, 353–357. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2000.33-353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J. E., Subramaniam, S., Brunson, L. Y., Larson, N. A., Poe, S. G., & St. Peter, C. C. (2015). Global measures of treatment integrity may mask important errors in discrete-trial training. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-014-0039-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fazzio, D., & Martin, G. L. (2011). Discrete-trials teaching with children with autism: A self-instructional manual. Winnipeg: Hugo Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M. & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).

  • Geiger, K. B., LeBlanc, L. A., Hubik, K., Jenkins, S. R., & Carr, J. E. (2018). Live training versus e-learning to teach implementation of listen response programs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51, 220–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higbee, T. S., Aporta, A. P., Resende, A., Nogueira, M., Goyos, C., & Pollard, J. S. (2016). Interactive computer training to teach discrete trial instruction to undergraduates and special educators in Brazil. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 780–793. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Student Achievement Through Staff Development (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leblanc, M. P., Ricciardi, J. N., & Luiselli, J. K. (2005). Improving discrete trial instruction by paraprofessional staff through abbreviated performance feedback intervention. Education and Treatment of Children, 28, 76–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, J. S., Higbee, T. S., Akers, J. S., & Brodhead, M. T. (2014). An evaluation of interactive computer training to teach instructors to implement discrete trials with children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 765–776. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, C. G., & Mueller, P. H. (2001). Employment and utilization of paraeducators in inclusive settings. The Journal of Special Education, 35, 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246690103500106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarokoff, R. A., & Sturmey, P. (2004). The effects of behavioral skills training on staff implementation of discrete-trial teaching. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 535–538. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2004.37-535.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Severtson, J. M., & Carr, J. E. (2012). Training novice instructors to implement errorless discrete-trial teaching: A sequential analysis. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5, 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2014). 36th annual report to congress on the implementation of the individuals with disabilities education act. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Tim Slocum, Tyra Sellers, Robert Morgan, and Eadric Bressel for their comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. We also thank Michele, Neeley, Laura, and the school district for their valuable support throughout this project. Portions of this article were submitted in partial fulfillment of the first author’s dissertation under the direction of the second author.

Funding

This study was partially fund by a grant from Utah State University, Graduate Research and Collaborative Opportunities Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristina R. Gerencser.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gerencser, K.R., Higbee, T.S., Contreras, B.P. et al. Evaluation of Interactive Computerized Training to Teach Paraprofessionals to Implement Errorless Discrete Trial Instruction. J Behav Educ 27, 461–487 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-9308-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-9308-9

Keywords

Navigation