Skip to main content
Log in

A Behavioral Intervention Package to Increase Vocalizations of Individuals with Autism During Speech-Generating Device Intervention

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined a behavioral intervention package to promote the use of target vocalizations alongside speech-generating device (SGD) mands. Six minimally verbal children with autism spectrum disorder participated, including three with no prior SGD experience. During baseline, SGD responses resulted in access to a preferred item and there was no reinforcement for vocalizations. In Phase I of intervention, responses that included target vocalizations were differentially reinforced with a highly preferred target item and, following a delay, responses without vocalizations produced an easy distractor trial and access to a lesser-preferred item. Three participants increased vocalizations with these procedures alone. For two of these participants, closer approximations or full words were modeled and differentially reinforced during a secondary intervention phase, resulting in an increase in closer matches for one of them. The third did not require this intervention, but a second target was introduced successfully. Although the remaining three participants responded minimally to Phase I, vocalizations increased to high levels for two of these three participants after a vocal model was added and faded during Phase II. Independent SGD maintained throughout all phases of the study for all participants, and participants generalized the use of vocalization responses when the SGD was not present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, E. S., & Jokel, A. (2012). Language outcomes for preverbal toddlers with autism. Studies in Literature and Language, 4, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bernthal, J. E., Bankson, N. W., & Flipsen, P. (2017). Articulation and phonological disorders: Speech sound disorders in children (8th ed.). Boston, Massachusetts: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blischak, D., Lombardino, L., & Dyson, A. (2003). Use of speech-generating devices: In support of natural speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 29–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bourret, J., Vollmer, T. R., & Rapp, J. T. (2004). Evaluation of a vocal mand assessment and vocal mand training procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 129–144.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, N. C., Storkel, H. L., Bushnell, P., Barker, R. M., Saunders, K., Daniels, D., et al. (2015). Investigating a multimodal intervention for children with limited expressive vocabularies associated with autism. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24, 438–459.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, V. J., Sweeney-Kerwin, E. J., Attanasio, V., & Kasper, T. (2010). Increasing the vocal responses of children with autism and developmental disabilities using manual sign mand training and prompt delay. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 705–709.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Charlop-Christy, M. H., Carpenter, M., Le, L., LeBlanc, L. A., & Kellet, K. (2002). Using the picture exchange communication system (PECS) with children with autism: Assessment of PECS acquisition, speech, social-communicative behavior, and problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 213–231.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519–533.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Esch, B. E. (2008). Early echoic skills assessment. In M. L. Sundberg (Ed.), Verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program: The VB-MAPP (p. 24). Concord, CA: AVB Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, L., & Bondy, A. (2002). The picture exchange communication system: Training manual. Newark, DE: Pyramid Educational Products.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganz, J. B., & Simpson, R. L. (2004). Effects on communicative requesting and speech development of the picture exchange communication system in children with characteristics of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 395–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gevarter, C., O’Reilly, M. F., Kuhn, M., Mills, K., Ferguson, R., & Watkins, L. (2016). Increasing the vocalizations of individuals with autism during intervention with a speech-generating device. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gevarter, C., O’Reilly, M. F., Rojeski, L., Sammarco, N., Lang, R., Lancioni, G. E., et al. (2013). Comparing communication systems for individuals with developmental disabilities: A review of single-case research studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 4415–4432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, V. A., Sigafoos, J., Didden, R., O’Reilly, M., Lancioni, G., Ollington, N., et al. (2008). Validity of a structured interview protocol for assessing children’s preferences. In P. G. Grotewell & Y. R. Burton (Eds.), Early childhood education: Issues and developments (pp. 87–104). New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, A. L., Tomaino, M. E., & Charlop, M. H. (2014). Adapting the picture exchange communication system to elicit vocalizations in children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26, 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen, D. (2003). Communicative repair strategies and problem behaviours of children with autism. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 50, 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas, O. I., Koegel, R., Simmons, J. Q., & Long, J. S. (1973). Some generalization and follow-up measures on autistic children in behavior therapy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 131–165.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ragliani, R. R., Ayres, K. M., Whiteside, E., & Ringdahl, J. E. (2017). Picture exchange communication system and delay to reinforcement. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-017-9564-y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, L., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Schlosser, R. W., Stevens, M., et al. (2014). An evaluation of speech production in two boys with neurodevelopmental disorders who received communication intervention with a speech-generating device. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 38, 10–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1997). Augmentative and alternative communication for children with developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 3, 363–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, D. E., & Greer, R. D. (2003). Generalized imitation and the mand: Inducing first instances of speech in young children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24, 58–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, R. W., & Wendt, O. (2008). Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production in children with autism: A systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 212–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schopler, E., Van Bourgondien, M. E., Wellman, G. J., & Love, S. R. (2010). Childhood autism rating scale (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigafoos, J., Didden, R., & O’Reilly, M. F. (2003). Effects of speech output on maintenance of requesting and frequency of vocalizations in three children with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 37–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sloane, H. N., Johnston, M. K., & Harris, F. R. (1968). Remedial procedures for teaching verbal behavior to speech deficient or defective young children. In H. N. Sloane & B. D. MacAulay (Eds.), Operant procedures in remedial speech and language training (pp. 77–101). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., & Balla, D. A. (2005). Vineland adaptive behavior scales (2nd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M. L. (2008). Verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program: The VB-MAPP. Concord, CA: AVB Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tincani, M. (2004). Comparing the picture exchange communication system and sign language training for children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 19, 152–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tincani, M., Crozier, S., & Alazetta, L. (2006). The picture exchange communication system: Effects on manding and speech development for school-aged children with autism. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cindy Gevarter.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

The first author was a professor at Manhattanville College (Purchase, NY) and the second author was a graduate student at Manhattanville College when data collection for the study occurred.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gevarter, C., Horan, K. A Behavioral Intervention Package to Increase Vocalizations of Individuals with Autism During Speech-Generating Device Intervention. J Behav Educ 28, 141–167 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-9300-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-9300-4

Keywords

Navigation