Abstract
Researchers have demonstrated for practitioners how to use multiple-schedules preparations to thin initially dense schedules of reinforcement during functional communication training, without sacrificing benefits associated with dense schedules of reinforcement for manding. However, special considerations may be required for practitioners to successfully apply this strategy to noncompliance. The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether multiple-schedules preparations could maintain contextually prescribed compliance and manding during interventions for noncompliance. For one participant, a multiple-schedules intervention was sufficient to establish socially valid outcomes. For the other, chained-schedules modifications were required before compliance emerged in relevant components.



Similar content being viewed by others
References
Álvarez, J. P., Call, N. A., & Mevers, J. E. L. (2014). Increasing the social validity of function-based treatments for problem behavior. Acta de Investigación Psicológica, 4, 1683–1700. doi:10.1016/S2007-4719(14)70974-3.
Ayllon, T. D., & Michael, J. (1959). The psychiatric nurse as a behavioral engineer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2, 323–334. doi:10.1901/jeab.1959.2-323.
Berg, W. K., Wacker, D. P., Harding, J. W., Ganzer, J., & Barretto, A. (2007). An evaluation of multiple dependent variables across distinct classes of antecedent stimuli pre and post functional communication training. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 4, 305–333. doi:10.1037/h0100346.
Betz, A. M., Fisher, W. W., Roane, H. S., Mintz, J. C., & Owen, T. M. (2013). A component analysis of schedule thinning during functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 219–241. doi:10.1002/jaba.23.
Bloom, S. E., & Lambert, J. M. (2015). Implications for practice: Resurgence and differential reinforcement of alternative responding. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 781–784.
Cammilleri, A. P., Tiger, J. H., & Hanley, G. P. (2008). Developing stimulus control of young children’s requests to teachers: Classwide applications of multiple schedules. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 299–303. doi:10.1901/jaba.2008.41-299.
Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126. doi:10.1901/jaba.1985.18-111.
Conners, J., Iwata, B. A., Kahng, S., Hanley, G. P., Worsdell, A. S., & Thompson, R. H. (2000). Differential responding in the presence and absence of discriminative stimuli during multielement functional analyses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 299–308. doi:10.1901/jaba.2000.33-299.
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519–533. doi:10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519.
Dempsey, C. M., Iwata, B. A., Fritz, J. N., & Rolider, N. U. (2012). Observer training revisited: A comparison of in vivo and video instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 827–832. doi:10.1901/jaba.2012.45-827.
Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. Cambridge, MA: Prentice Hall.
Fisher, W. W., Kuhn, D. E., & Thompson, R. H. (1998). Establishing discriminative control of responding using functional and alternative reinforcers during functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 543–560. doi:10.1901/jaba.1998.31-543.
Fisher, W., Piazza, C., Cataldo, M., Harrell, R., Jefferson, G., & Conner, R. (1993). Functional communication training with and without extinction and punishment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 23–36. doi:10.1901/jaba.1993.26-23.
Greer, B. D., Fisher, W. W., Saini, V., Owen, T. M., & Jones, J. K. (2016). Functional communication training during reinforcement schedule thinning: An analysis of 25 applications. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 105–121. doi:10.1002/jaba.265.
Grow, L. L., LeBlanc, L. A., & Carr, J. E. (2010). Developing stimulus control of the high-rate social-approach responses of an adult with mental retardation: A multiple-evaluation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 285–289. doi:10.1901/jaba.2010.43-285.
Hagopian, L. P., Boelter, E. W., & Jarmolowicz, D. P. (2011). Reinforcement schedule thinning following functional communication training: Review and recommendations. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 4, 4–16.
Hagopian, L. P., Fisher, W. W., Sullivan, M. T., Acquisto, J., & LeBlanc, L. A. (1998). Effectiveness of functional communication training with and without extinction and punishment: A summary of 21 inpatient cases. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 211–235. doi:10.1901/jaba.1998.31-211.
Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & Thompson, R. H. (2001). Reinforcement schedule thinning following treatment with functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 17–38. doi:10.1901/jaba.2001.34-17.
Hanley, G. P., Piazza, C. C., Fisher, W. W., Contrucci, S. A., & Maglieri, K. A. (1997). Evaluation of client preference for function-based treatment packages. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 359–473. doi:10.1901/jaba.1997.30-459.
Harris, S. L., & Wolchik, S. A. (1979). Suppression of self-stimulation: Three alternative strategies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 185–198. doi:10.1901/jaba.1979.12-185.
Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, G. J. (1994). Stages of moral development as stages of rule-governance. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, G. J. Hayes, S. C. Moore, & P. M. Ghezzi (Eds.), Ethical issues in developmental disabilities (pp. 45–65). Reno, NV: Context Press.
Hayes, S. C., Zettle, R. D., & Rosenfarb, I. (1989). Rule-following. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 191–220). New York: Plenum Press.
Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209. doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197.
Kalb, L. M., & Loeber, R. (2003). Child disobedience and noncompliance: A review. Pediatrics, 111, 641–652. doi:10.1542/peds.111.3.641.
Lalli, J. S., Casey, S., & Kates, K. (1995). Reducing escape behavior and increasing task completion with functional communication training, extinction, and response chaining. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 261–268. doi:10.1901/jaba.1995.28-261.
Leitenberg, H., Burchard, J. D., Burchard, S. N., Fuller, E. J., & Lysaght, T. V. (1977). Using positive reinforcement to suppress behavior: Some experimental comparisons with sibling conflict. Behavior Therapy, 8, 168–182. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(77)80266-9.
Luczynski, K. C., & Hanley, G. P. (2009). Do children prefer contingencies? An evaluation of the efficacy of and preference for contingent versus noncontingent social reinforcement during play. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 511–525. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(77)80266-9.
McKerchar, P. M., & Abby, L. (2012). Systematic evaluation of variables that contribute to noncompliance: A replication and extension. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 607–611. doi:10.1901/jaba.2012.45-607.
Mildon, R. L., Moore, D. W., & Dixon, R. S. (2004). Combining noncontingent escape and functional communication training as a treatment for negatively reinforced disruptive behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 92–102. doi:10.1177/10983007040060020401.
Perry, A. C., & Fisher, W. W. (2001). Behavioral economic influences on treatments designed to decrease destructive behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 211–215. doi:10.1901/jaba.2001.34-211.
Reimers, T. M., Wacker, D. P., Cooper, L. J., Sasso, G. M., Berg, W. K., & Steege, M. W. (1993). Asssessing the functional properties of noncompliant behavior in an outpatient setting. Child & Family Therapy, 15, 1–15.
Roane, H. S., Vollmer, T. R., Ringdahl, J. E., & Marcus, B. A. (1998). Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 605–620. doi:10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605.
Rodriguez, N. M., Thompson, R. H., & Baynham, T. Y. (2010). Assessment of the relative effects of attention and escape on noncompliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 143–147. doi:10.1901/jaba.2010.43-143.
Roscoe, E. M., Rooker, G. W., Pence, S. T., & Longworth, L. J. (2009). Assessing the utility of a demand assessment for functional analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 819–825. doi:10.1901/jaba.2009.42-819.
Saini, V., Miller, S. A., & Fisher, W. W. (2016). Multiple schedules in practical application: Research trends and implications for future investigation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 1–24. doi:10.1002/jaba.300.
Tiger, J. H., & Hanley, G. P. (2004). Developing stimulus control of preschooler mands: An analysis of schedule-correlated and contingency-specifying stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 517–521. doi:10.1901/jaba.2004.37-517.
Tiger, J. H., Hanley, G. P., & Larsen, K. M. (2008). A practical variation of a multiple-schedule procedure: Brief schedule-correlated stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 125–130. doi:10.1901/jaba.2008.41-125.
Vargo, K. K., Heal, N. A., Epperley, K., & Kooistra, E. (2014). The effects of a multiple schedule plus rules on hand raising during circle time in preschool classrooms. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23, 326–343. doi:10.1007/s10864-014-9199-3.
Vollmer, T. R., Iwata, B. A., Zarcone, J. R., Smith, R. G., & Mazaleski, J. L. (1993). The role of attention in the treatment of attention-maintained self-injurious behavior: Noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 9–22. doi:10.1901/jaba.1993.26-9.
Wilder, D. A., & Atwell, J. (2006). Evaluation of a guided compliance procedure to reduce noncompliance among preschool children. Behavioral Interventions, 21, 265–272. doi:10.1002/bin.222.
Wilder, D. A., Harris, C., Reagan, R., & Rasey, A. (2007). Functional analysis and treatment of noncompliance by preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 173–177. doi:10.1901/jaba.2007.44-06.
Wilder, D. A., Myers, K., Fischetti, A., Leon, Y., Nicholson, K., & Allison, J. (2012). An analysis of modifications to the three-step guided compliance procedure necessary to achieve compliance among preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 121–130. doi:10.1901/jaba.2012.45-121.
Acknowledgments
Anne M. Clohisy is now at the Thompson Center for Autism & Neurodevelopmental Disorders at the University of Missouri. We thank Taylor Brady, Carmen Caruthers, Crystal Finley, Ashton Hooper, Maggie Ward, and Stephanie Villeda who assisted in conducting this study, Rachel Mottern for her assistance with data analysis, and the Treatment and Research Institute for Autism Spectrum Disorders (TRIAD) for providing access to space and resources.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Standard
All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
All participants’ guardians provided informed consent, and all participants assented to participate in this study before we initiated study-related activities.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lambert, J.M., Clohisy, A.M., Blair Barrows, S. et al. Compound-Schedules Approaches to Noncompliance: Teaching Children When to Ask and When to Work. J Behav Educ 26, 201–220 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-016-9260-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-016-9260-5

