Advertisement

Journal of Behavioral Education

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 338–371 | Cite as

Functional Behavior Assessment in Schools: Current Status and Future Directions

  • Cynthia M. AndersonEmail author
  • Billie Jo Rodriguez
  • Amy Campbell
Original Paper

Abstract

Functional behavior assessment is becoming a commonly used practice in school settings. Accompanying this growth has been an increase in research on functional behavior assessment. We reviewed the extant literature on documenting indirect and direct methods of functional behavior assessment in school settings. To discern best practice guidelines and directions for future research, we evaluated studies to identify the (a) type of FBA used, (b) participant characteristics, (c) settings in which functional behavior assessments commonly were conducted, and (d) trends in the use of various methods of functional behavior assessment over time.

Keywords

Functional behavior assessment School Challenging behavior 

References

  1. Aman, M. G., Singh, N. N., Stewart, A. W., & Field, C. J. (1985). Psychometric properties of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 89, 492–502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, C. M., & Long, E. S. (2002). Use of a structured descriptive assessment methodology to identify variables affecting problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 137–154. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-137.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, C. M., & St. Peter, C. C. (2013). Functional analysis with typically developing children: Best practice or too early to tell? In Response to Hanley (2012). Behavior Analysis in Practice, 6, 62–76.Google Scholar
  4. Asmus, Jennifer M., Franzese, Julie C., Conroy, Maureen A., & Dozier, Claudia L. (2003). Clarifying Functional Analysis Outcomes for Disruptive Behaviors by Controlling Consequence Delivery for Stereotypy. School Psychology Review, 32, 624–630.Google Scholar
  5. Banda, Devender R., & Sokolosky, Stephanie. (2012). Effectiveness of noncontingent attention to decrease attention-maintained disruptive behaviors in the general education classroom. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 34(2), 130–140. doi: 10.1080/07317107.2012.684646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beavers, G. A., Iwata, B. A., & Lerman, D. C. (2013). Thirty years of research on the functional analysis of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 1–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Berg, Wendy K., Wacker, David P., Cigrand, Karla, Merkle, Steve, Wade, Jeanie, Henry, Kim, & Wang, Yu-Chia. (2007). Comparing Functional Analysis and Paired-choice Assessment Results in Classroom Settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 545–552. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.40-545.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bessette, K. K., & Wills, H. P. (2007). An example of an elementary school paraprofessional-implemented functional analysis and intervention. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 192–210.Google Scholar
  9. Betz, A. M., & Fisher, W. W. (2011). Functional analysis: History and methods. In W. W. Fisher, C. C. Piazza, & H. S. Roane (Eds.), Handbook of applied behavior analysis (pp. 206–228). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bijou, S. W., Peterson, R. F., & Ault, M. H. (1968). A method to integrate descriptive and experimental field studies at the level of data and empirical concepts. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 175–191.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Blood, Erika, & Neel, Richard S. (2007). From FBA to implementation: A look at what is actually being delivered. Education & Treatment of Children, 30, 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conroy, M. (1999). Setting-event identification tool. Unpublished assessment tool.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, T. N., Durand, S., Bankhead, J., Strickland, E., Blenden, K., Dacus, S., et al. (2013). Brief report: Latency functional analysis of elopement. Behavioral Interventions, 28(3), 251–259. doi: 10.1002/bin.1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Day, R. M., Rea, J. A., Schussler, N. G., Larsen, S. E., & Johnson, W. L. (1988). A functionally based approach to the treatment of self-injurious behavior. Behavior Modification, 12, 565–589.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Derby, K. M., Wacker, D. P., Peck, S., Sasso, G., DeRaad, A., Berg, W., et al. (1994). Functional analysis of separate topographies of aberrant behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 267–278. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-267.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dolezal, D. N., & Kurtz, P. F. (2010). Evaluation of combined-antecedent variables on functional analysis results and treatment of problem behavior in a school setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43(2), 309–314. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-309.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunlap, G., Kern-Dunlap, L., Clarke, S., & Robbins, F. R. (1991). Functional assessment, curricular revision, and severe behavior problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 387–397.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Durand, V. M., & Crimmins, D. B. (1987). Assessment and treatment of psychotic speech in an Autistic Child. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 17, 17–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Durand, V. M., & Crimmins, D. B. (1988). Identifying the variables maintaining self-injurious behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18(1), 99–117. doi: 10.1007/BF02211821.
  20. Durand, V. M., & Crimmins, D. (1992). The motivational assessment scale. Topeka, KS: Monaco & Associates.Google Scholar
  21. Edwards, R. P. (2002). Functional assessment informant record for teachers. Proven Practice: Prevention and Remediation Solutions for Schools, 4, 15–24.Google Scholar
  22. Ellis, J., & Magee, S. (2004). Modifications to Basic Functional Analysis Procedures in School Settings: A Selective Review. Behavioral Interventions, 19, 205–228. doi: 10.1002/bin.161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. English, Carie L., & Anderson, Cynthia Marie. (2006). Evaluation of the Treatment Utility of the Analog Functional Analysis and the Structured Descriptive Assessment. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 212–229. doi: 10.1177/10983007060080040401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ervin, R. A., Radford, P. M., Bertsch, K., Piper, A. L., Ehrhardt, K. E., & Poling, A. (2001). A descriptive analysis and critique of the empirical literature on school-based functional assessment. School Psychology Review, 30, 1–18.Google Scholar
  25. Fox, J., & Davis, C. (2005). Functional Behavior Assessment in Schools: Current Research Findings and Future Directions. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 1–4. doi: 10.1007/s10864-005-0957-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Galiatsatos, G. Tracey, & Graff, Richard B. (2003). Combining descriptive and functional analyses to assess and treat screaming. Behavioral Interventions, 18(2), 123–138. doi: 10.1002/bin.133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanley, Gregory P. (2012). Functional assessment of problem behavior: Dispelling myths, overcoming implementation obstacles, and developing new lore. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5, 54–72.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & McCord, B. E. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 147–185. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-147.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Heckaman, K., Conroy, M. A., Fox, J., & Chait, A. (2000). Functional assessment-based intervention research on students with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders in school settings. Behavioral Disorders, 25, 196–210.Google Scholar
  30. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400. (2004).Google Scholar
  31. Iwata, B. A. (1995). Functional assessment screening tool (FAST). Gainsville, FL: University of Florida.Google Scholar
  32. Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1982). /1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(2), 197–209. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kamps, Debra M., Wendland, Maura, & Culpepper, Michelle. (2006). Active teacher participation in functional behavior assessment for students with emotional and behavioral disorders risks in general education classrooms. Behavioral Disorders, 31, 128–146.Google Scholar
  34. Kates-McElrath, K., Agnew, M., Axelrod, S., & Bloh, C. L. (2007). Identification of behavioral function in public schools and a clarification of terms. Behavioral Interventions, 22, 47–56. doi: 10.1002/bin.230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kern, L., Dunlap, G., Clarke, S., & Childs, K. E. (1994). Student-assisted functional assessment interview. Diagnostique, 19, 29–39.Google Scholar
  36. Kratochwill, T. R., & Bergan, J. R. (1990). Behavioral consultation in applied settings: An individual’s guide. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lewis, Timothy J., & Sugai, George M. (1996). Functional assessment of problem behavior: A pilot investigation on the comparative and interactive effects of teacher and peer social attention on students in general education settings. School Psychology Quarterly, 11(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1037/h0088918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mace, F. C., & Knight, D. (1986). Functional analysis and treatment of severe pica. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19(4), 411–416.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. March, R. E., Horner, R. H., Lewis-Palmer, T., Brown, D., Crone, D., Todd, A. W., et al. (2000). Functional assessment checklist: teachers and staff (FACTS). Eugene, OR: Educational and Community Supports.Google Scholar
  40. McKenney, Elizabeth L. W., Waldron, Nancy, & Conroy, Maureen. (2013). The effects of training and performance feedback during behavioral consultation on general education middle school teachers’ integrity to functional analysis procedures. Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation, 23, 63–85. doi: 10.1080/10474412.2013.757152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mueller, Michael M., Nkosi, Ajamu, & Hine, Jeffrey F. (2011). Functional analysis in public schools: A summary of 90 functional analyses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 807–818. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-807.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Northup, J., Wacker, D. P., Berg, W. K., & Kelly, L. (1994). The treatment of severe behavior problems in school settings using a technical assistance model. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.Google Scholar
  43. O’Neill, R. E., Horner, R., Albin, R., Sprague, J., Storey, K., & Newton, J. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. Paclawskyj, T. R., Matson, J. L., Rush, K. S., Smalls, Y., & Vollmer, T. R. (2000). Questions about behavior function (QABF): A behavioral checklist for functional assessment of aberrant behavior. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 21, 223–229.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Penno, D. A., Frank, A. R., & Wacker, D. P. (2000). Instructional Accommodations for Adolescent Students with Severe Emotional or Behavioral Disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 25, 1–20.Google Scholar
  46. Preciado, Jorge A., Horner, Robert H., & Baker, Scott K. (2008). Using a function-based approach to decrease problem behaviors and increase academic engagement for Latino English language learners. The Journal of Special Education, 42, 227–240. doi: 10.1177/0022466907313350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reed, H., Thomas, E., Sprague, J., & Horner, R. (1997). Student guided functional analysis interview form: An analysis of student and teacher agreement. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7(1), 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reid, R., & Nelson, J. R. (2002). The Utility, Acceptability, and Practicality of Functional Behavioral Assessment for Students with High-Incidence Problem Behaviors. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 15–23. doi: 10.1177/074193250202300103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Richman, David M., Wacker, David P., Asmus, Jennifer M., Casey, Sean D., & Andelman, Marc. (1999). Further analysis of problem behavior in response class hierarchies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 269–283. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-269.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Roberts, M. L., Marshall, J., Nelson, J. R., & Albers, C. A. (2001). Curriculum-Based Assessment Procedures Embedded within Functional Behavioral Assessments. School Psychology Review, 30, 1–14.Google Scholar
  51. Rooker, Griffin W., Iwata, Brian A., Harper, Jill M., Fahmie, Tara A., & Camp, Erin M. (2011). False-positive tangible outcomes of functional analyses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 737–745. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-737.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Sasso, G. M., Conroy, M. A., Peck Stichter, J., & Fox, J. J. (2001). Slowing down the bandwagon: The misapplication of functional assessment for students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 26, 282–296.Google Scholar
  53. Scott, T. M., & Barrett, S. B. (2004). Using staff and student time engaged in disciplinary procedures to evaluate the impact of school-wide PBS. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6(1), 21–27. doi: 10.1177/10983007040060010401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shirley, Melissa J., Iwata, Brian A., & Kahng, Sung Woo. (1999). False-positive management of self-injurious behavior by access to tangible reinforcers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 201–204. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-201.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Sigafoos, J., & Saggers, E. (1995). A discrete-trial approach to the functional analysis of aggressive behaviour in two boys with autism. Australia & New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 20(4), 287–297.Google Scholar
  56. Sprague, J. R., & Horner, R. H. (1992). Covariation within functional response classes: Implications for treatment of severe problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 735–745.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Stage, S. A., Cheney, D., Walker, B., & LaRocque, M. (2002). A preliminary discriminant and convergent validity study of the teacher functional behavioral assessment checklist. School Psychology Review, 31, 71–93.Google Scholar
  58. Stichter, J. P., Lewis, T. J., Johnson, N., & Trussell, R. (2004). Toward a Structural Assessment: Analyzing the Merits of an Assessment Tool for a Student with E/BD. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30, 25–40. doi: 10.1177/073724770403000103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stoiber, K. (2004). Functional assessment and intervention system: Improving school behavior (FAIS). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  60. Sugai, G., & Tindal, G. (1993). Effective school consultation: An interactive approach. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  61. Touchette, P. E., MacDonald, R. F., & Langer, S. N. (1985). A scatter plot for identifying stimulus control of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 343–351. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-343.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Watson, T. S., Dufrene, B. A., Weaver, A., Butler, T., & Meeks, C. (2005). Brief Antecedent Assessment and Treatment of Tics in the General Education Classroom: A Preliminary Investigation. Behavior Modification, 29(6), 839–857. doi: 10.1177/0145445505279252.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Weeks, M., & Gaylord-Ross, R. (1981). Task difficulty and aberrant behavior in severely handicapped students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 449–463.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cynthia M. Anderson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Billie Jo Rodriguez
    • 2
  • Amy Campbell
    • 3
  1. 1.Appalachian State UniversityBooneUSA
  2. 2.University of Texas, San AntonioSan AntonioUSA
  3. 3.Grand Valley State UniversityAllendaleUSA

Personalised recommendations