Skip to main content

Performance of Fourth-Grade Students with Learning Disabilities on Multiplication Facts Comparing Teacher-Mediated and Technology-Mediated Interventions: A Preliminary Investigation

Abstract

Instructional applications (apps) are educational software programs that can be accessed via mobile technologies (e.g., iPad, smartphone) and used to help students acquire various academic skills, including mathematics. Although research suggests that app-based instruction (AI) can be effective, there is a paucity of research comparing AI, to teacher-directed instruction (TDI) or to a combination of instructional approaches (CI) involving both AI and TDI in tandem. In an alternating treatments design, we compared AI, TDI, and CI conditions during instruction targeting multiplication facts with six students with learning disabilities. Results were inconsistent across students, and no condition emerged as consistently better than the others. Students completed social validity rating scales, and all approaches were favored by at least one student. Our results support findings from previous research involving similar comparisons between these instructional formats in which no (or minimal) differences across conditions were detected. We conclude that there may not be a meaningful difference between the outcomes achieved using AI, TDI, or CI for many students. Results are discussed in terms of directions for the future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Lerkkanen, M.-K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2004). Developmental dynamics of math performance from preschool to grade 2. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 699–713. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Lee, D.-S. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 51–73. doi:10.1177/0741932507309711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berch, D. B., & Mazzocco, M. M. M. (Eds.). (2007). Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bouck, E. C., & Flanagan, S. (2009). Assistive technology and mathematics: What is there and where can we go in special education? Journal of Special Education Technology, 24, 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bryant, D. P., & Bryant, B. R. (2011). Assistive technology for people with disabilities (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Gersten, R., Scammacca, N., Funk, C., Winter, A., et al. (2008). The effects of Tier 2 intervention on first-grade mathematics performance of first-grade students who are at risk for mathematics difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 47–63. doi:10.2307/2052881.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Langley, J., Flower, A., Hou, V., McKenna, J., et al. (2011a). Secondary special education observation and intervention study: Technical report. Austin, TX: University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bryant, B. R., Bryant, D. P., Porterfield, J., Falcomata, T., Shih, M., Valentine, C., Brewer, C., & Bell, K. (in press). The effects of a Tier 3 intervention for second grade students with serious mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities.

  9. Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Pfannestiel, K., Porterfield, J., & Gersten, R. (2011b). Early numeracy intervention program for first-grade students with mathematics difficulties. Exceptional Children, 78, 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bryant, B. R., Kim, M. K., Ok, M. W., Kang, E. Y., Bryant, D. P., Lang, R., & Son, S. H. (in press). A comparison of reading interventions for 4th grade students with learning disabilities. Behavior Modification.

  11. Burns, M. K., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Jiban, C. (2006). Assessing the instructional level for mathematics: A comparison of methods. School Psychology Review, 35, 401–418.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Calhoon, M. B., Al Otaiba, S., Greenberg, D., King, A., & Avalos, A. (2006). Improving reading skills in predominantly Hispanic Title 1 first-grade classrooms: The promise of peer-assisted learning strategies. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 27, 261–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cirino, P. T., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Barnes, M. A., Fuchs, L. S., & Fletcher, J. M. (2007). Cognitive arithmetic differences in learning disabled groups and the role of behavioral inattention. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Douglas, K. H., Wojcik, B. W., & Thompson, J. R. (2011). Is there an app for that? Journal of Special Education Technology., 27, 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fitzgerald, G., Koury, K., & Mitchem, K. (2008). Research on computer-mediated instruction for students with high incidence disabilities. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38, 201–233. doi:10.2190/EC.38.2.e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Paulsen, K., Bryant, J., & Hamlett, C. L. (2005). Responsiveness to intervention: Preventing and identifying mathematics disability. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37, 60–63.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Geary, D. C. (2011). Consequences, characteristics, and causes of mathematical learning disabilities and persistent low achievement in mathematics. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 33, 250–263. doi:10.1097/DBP.0b013e318209edef.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byrd-Craven, J., Nugent, L., & Numtee, C. (2007). Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability. Child Development, 78, 1343–1359. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01069.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gersten, R., Chard, D., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S., Morphy, P., & Flojo, J. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1202–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C., & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early identification and intervention for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 293–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hanich, L. B., Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., & Dick, J. (2001). Performance across different areas of mathematical cognition in children with learning difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 615–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Howell, R., Sidorenko, E., & Jurica, J. (1987). The effects of computer use on the acquisition of multiplication facts by a student with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 336–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hughes, C. A., & Maccini, P. (1996). Computer-assisted mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A research review. Learning Disabilities, 8, 155–166.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Instant Interactive. (2012). Math drills. iTunes: Author.

  25. Jitendra, A. K., Edwards, L. L., & Starosta, K. (2004). Early reading instruction for children with reading difficulties: Meeting the needs of diverse learners. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 421–439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45, 850–867.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kagohara, D., van der Meer, L., Ramdoss, S., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., Davis, T. N., et al. (2013). Using iPods and iPads in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 147–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lang, R., Ramdoss, S., Sigafoos, J., Green, V., van der Meer, L., Tostanoski, A., et al. (2014). Assistive technology for postsecondary students with disabilities. In G. E. Lancioni & N. N. Singh (Eds.), Assistive technology for people with diverse abilities (pp. 53–76). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee, A., Lang, R., Davenport, K., Moore, M., Rispoli, M., van der Meer, L., Carnett, A., Raulston, T., Tostanoski, A., & Chung, C. (in press). Comparison of therapist implemented and iPad-assisted interventions for children with autism. Developmental Neurorehabilitation.

  30. National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2013). The nation’s report card. Retrieved from http://nationsreportcard.gov/math%5F2013/

  31. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics: A quest for coherence. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  32. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nirvi, S. (2011). Special education pupils find learning tool in iPad applications. Education Week, 30, 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Okolo, C. M., Bahr, C. M., & Rieth, H. J. (1993). A retrospective view of computer-based instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ramdoss, S., Lang, R., Fragale, C., Britt, C., O’Reilly, M., Sigafoos, J., et al. (2012a). Use of computer-based interventions to promote daily living skills in individuals with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 24, 197–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ramdoss, S., Lang, R., Mulloy, A., Franco, J., O’Reilly, M., Didden, R., & Lancioni, G. (2011a). Use of computer-based intervention to improve communication in individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20, 55–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ramdoss, S., Machalicek, W., Rispoli, M., Mulloy, A., Lang, R., & O’Reilly, M. (2012b). Computer based interventions to improve social and emotional skills in individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 15, 119–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ramdoss, S., Mulloy, A., Lang, R., O’Reilly, M., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G., et al. (2011b). Use of computer-based interventions to improve literacy skills in students with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 1306–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rispoli, M., Lang, R., Neely, L., Hutchins, N., Camargo, S., Davenport, K., & Goodwyn, F. (2013). A comparison of within- and across-activity choices for reducing challenging behavior in children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Behavioral Education, 22, 66–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Stein, M., Kinder, D., Silbert, J., & Carnine, D. W. (2006). Designing effective mathematics instruction: A direct instruction approach (4th ed.). Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Stine, M. A. (n.d.). The middle school algebra readiness initiative in the Everett public school district initiative. Pittsburg, PA: Carnegie Foundation.

  43. Swanson, H. L., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ulman, J. G. (2005). Making technology work for learners with special needs: Practical skills for teachers. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bascon.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Vaughn, S., & Bos, C. (2009). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavioral problems (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Verschuur, R., Didden, R., Van der Meer, L., Achmadi, D., Kagohara, D., Green, V., et al. (2011). Investigating the validity of a structured interview protocol for assessing the preferences of children with autism spectrum disorders. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 14, 366–371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Watkins, M. W., & Webb, C. (1981). Computer assisted instruction with learning disabled students. Educational Computer Magazine, 1, 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wilson, R., Majsterek, D., & Simmons, D. (1996). The effects of computer-assisted versus teacher-directed instruction on the multiplication performance of elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 382–390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Woodward, J. (2006). Developing automaticity in multiplication facts: Integrating strategy instruction with timed practice drills. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29, 269–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zephyr Games. (2012). Math evolve. iTunes: Author.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Russell Lang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bryant, B.R., Ok, M., Kang, E.Y. et al. Performance of Fourth-Grade Students with Learning Disabilities on Multiplication Facts Comparing Teacher-Mediated and Technology-Mediated Interventions: A Preliminary Investigation. J Behav Educ 24, 255–272 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-015-9218-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mathematics
  • Leaning disabilities
  • Technology
  • iPad
  • Intervention