Using Brief Academic Assessments to Determine Generalization Strategies
- 318 Downloads
This study examined the utility of brief academic assessments to identify effective generalization procedures for individual students. Specifically, the study built on the proposal that brief assessments of antecedent and consequence manipulations can identify the most effective generalization strategy for individual students. The design was an alternating treatments design nested within a multiple baseline across six students. Students learned how to solve a set of multiplication facts using a common strategy while spontaneous generalization to other sets of facts was measured. Next, researchers determined whether an antecedent- or consequent-based generalization strategy would be more effective for increasing generalization across multiplication skills and conducted an extended analysis with an alternating treatment phase to confirm results of the brief assessment. Results indicated that the assessment correctly identified the most effective generalization strategy for five of the six students.
KeywordsGeneralization Math interventions Brief academic assessment Multiple baseline Alternating treatments design
- Burns, M. K., & Wagner, D. (2008). Determining an effective intervention within a brief experimental analysis for reading: A meta-analytic review. School Psychology Review, 37(1), 126–136.Google Scholar
- Carnine, D. (1980). Preteaching versus concurrent teaching of the component skills of a multiplication algorithm. Journal for Research in Mathematics Educations, 11(5), 375–379. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/748628.
- Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Daly, E. J, I. I. I., Bonfiglio, C. M., Mattson, T., Persampieri, M., & Foreman-Ya, K. (2006). Refining the experimental analysis of academic skills deficits: Part II. Use of brief experimental analysis to evaluate reading fluency treatments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39(3), 323–331. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.13-05.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- DuVall, T. D., McLaughlin, T. F., & Sederstrom, G. C. (2003). The differential effects of skip counting and previewing on accuracy and fluency of math facts with middle school children with learning disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 18(1), 1–6. Retrieved from http://www.internationalsped.com/documents/ACFFE.doc.
- Fennell, F. M., Altieri, M. B., & Silver Burdett Ginn Firm. (1998). In mathematics the path to math success!. Parsippany, NJ: Silver Burdett Ginn.Google Scholar
- Haring, N., & Eaton, M. (1978). Systematic instructional procedures: An instructional hierarchy. In N. G. Haring, T. C. Lovitt, M. D. Eaton, & C. L. Hansen (Eds.), The fourth R: Research in the classroom (pp. 23–40). Columbus, OH: Merrill.Google Scholar
- House, S., Duhon, G., Hastings, K., & Linden, S. (2009). Using generalization ratio to determine the amount of generalization between early literacy skills. Poster presented at American Psychological Association conference, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
- Lloyd, J., Saltzman, N. J., & Kauffman, J. M. (1981). Predictable generalization in academic learning as a result of preskills and strategy training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4(2), 203–216. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1511005.
- McIntyre, S., Test, D., Cooke, N., & Beattie, J. (1991). Using count-bys to increase multiplication facts fluency. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14(2), 82–88. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1510516.
- Noell, G., Roane, H., VanDerHeyden, A., Whitmarsh, E., & Gatti, S. (2000). Programming for communication in the classroom following an assessment of skill and performance deficits. School Psychology Review, 29(3), 429–442.Google Scholar
- Rhode, G., Morgan, D., & Young, K. (1983). Generalization and maintenance of treatment gains of behaviorally handicapped students from resource rooms to regular classrooms using self-evaluation procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16(2), 171. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1983.16-171.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Weinstein, G., & Cooke, N. (1992). The effects of two repeated reading interventions on generalization of fluency. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15(1), 21–28. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1510562.