Advertisement

Journal of Behavioral Education

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 224–232 | Cite as

Effects of Language of Implementation on Functional Analysis Outcomes

  • Mandy RispoliEmail author
  • Mark O’Reilly
  • Russell Lang
  • Jeff Sigafoos
  • Austin Mulloy
  • Jeannie Aguilar
  • George Singer
Original Paper

Abstract

This study evaluated the influence of language of implementation on functional analysis outcomes for a child with a severe intellectual disability from a Spanish-speaking home. Challenging behavior was assessed during 5-min sessions under 4 conditions; attention, play-verbal, play-nonverbal, and demand and across 2 phases; implementation in English versus Spanish. The highest levels of challenging behavior occurred during the attention and demand conditions of the English phases. These results suggest that the language of implementation may influence the overall levels of challenging behavior within functional analysis conditions.

Keywords

Functional analysis Language Challenging behavior Diversity 

References

  1. Barlow, D. H., Nock, M. K., & Hersen, M. (2009). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (3rd ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  2. Bzoch, K. R., League, R., & Brown, V. L. (2003). Receptive-expressive emergent language test-third edition (REEL–3). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  3. Call, N. A., Wacker, D. P., Ringdahl, J. E., & Boelter, E. W. (2005). Combined antecedent variables as motivating operations within functional analyses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 385–389.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fisher, W. W., Ninness, H. A. C., Piazza, C. C., & Owen-DeSchryver, J. S. (1996). On the reinforcing effects of the content of verbal attention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 235–238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209. (Reprinted from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20, 1982).Google Scholar
  6. Lang, R., O’Reilly, M., Machalicek, W., Lancioni, G., Rispoli, M., & Chan, J. M. (2008). A preliminary comparison of functional analysis results when conducted in contrived versus naturalistic settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 135–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Laraway, S., Snycerski, S., Michael, J., & Poling, A. (2003). Motivating operations and terms to describe them: Some further refinements. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 407–414.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McComas, J. J., Thompson, A., & Johnson, L. (2003). The effects of presession attention on problem behavior maintained by different reinforcers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 297–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mueller, T. G., Singer, G. H., & Grace, E. (2004). The individuals with disabilities education act and California’s proposition 227: Implications for English language learners with special needs. Bilingual Research Journal, 28, 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. O’Reilly, M. F., Lacey, C., & Lancioni, G. E. (2000). Assessment of the influence of background noise on escape-maintained problem behavior and pain behavior in a child with Williams syndrome. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 511–514.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sigafoos, J. (2000). Communication development and aberrant behavior in children with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 168–176.Google Scholar
  12. Sigafoos, J., Arthur, M., & O’Reilly, M. (2003). Challenging behavior and developmental disability. London: Whurr.Google Scholar
  13. Singer, G., Mueller, T., & Grace, E. (2003). Special education teacher beliefs and practices for English language learners with moderate and severe disabilities, UC LMRI FINAL GRANT REPORT #00–01G-SB. CA: Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  14. Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. (2002) A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students’ long-term academic achievement. Report: ED475048, p. 337.Google Scholar
  15. US Census Bureau. (2007). American community survey 1-year estimates: R1601. Percent of people 5 years and over who speak a language other than english at home. Retrieved June 2, 2009, from http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/GRTTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=01000US&-_box_head_nbr=R1601&-ds_name=ACS_2007_1YR_G00_&-redoLog=false&-format=US-30&-mt_name=ACS_2006_EST_G00_R1601_US30.
  16. US Census Bureau (2009) State and county quick facts. Retrieved December 17, 2010, from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/48000.html.
  17. Worsdell, A. S., Iwata, B. A., Conners, J., Kahng, S., & Thompson, R. H. (2000). Relative influences of establishing operations and reinforcement contingencies on self-injurious behavior during functional analyses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 451–461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mandy Rispoli
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mark O’Reilly
    • 2
  • Russell Lang
    • 3
  • Jeff Sigafoos
    • 4
  • Austin Mulloy
    • 2
  • Jeannie Aguilar
    • 2
  • George Singer
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Educational Psychology4225 Texas A & M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Meadows Center for Preventing Educational RiskThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  3. 3.Texas State University-San Marcos, Clinic for Autism Research Evaluation and SupportSan MarcosUSA
  4. 4.Victoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand
  5. 5.The University of California Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations