Skip to main content

Effects of Self-Recording and Contingent Credit on Balancing Participation Across Students

Abstract

This study compared the effects of students’ (a) receiving participation credit with and without self-recording their participation and (b) self-recording participation with and without receiving credit for participation on the percentage of students functioning at four participation levels: non-participation, credit-level participation, frequent participation (slightly above credit-level), and dominant participation (2.5+ times above credit-level). Participants came from three sections of a relatively large discussion course (initially 55 students per section). Credit (with and without self-recording participation) decreased the percentage of both non-participants and dominant participants and increased the percentage of credit-level participants, thus creating greater balance in participation across students in each class. In contrast, self-recording versus non-self-recording (with and without credit) did not significantly differentiate the percentages of either non-participants or frequent participants but did differentiate the percentages of credit-level and dominant participants under the recording conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Bean, J. C., & Peterson, D. (1998). Grading classroom participation. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 74, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boniecki, K. A., & Moore, S. (2003). Breaking the silence: Using a token economy to reinforce classroom participation. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 224–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruss, K. S. (2009). Improving class discussion: A rhetorical approach. The Journal of General Education, 58, 28–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchfield, C. M., & Sappington, J. (1999). Participation in classroom discussion. Teaching of Psychology, 26, 290–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2004). Classroom participation and discussion effectiveness: Student-generated strategies. Communication Education, 53, 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B. G. (1993). Tools for teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, G. A., & Takane, Y. (1989). Statistical analysis in psychology and education (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, L. N., Krohn, K. R., McCleary, D. F., Miller, K. B., Nalls, M. L., Quillivan, C. C., et al. (2009). Increasing low-responding students’ participation in class discussion. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, G. K., & Nelson, N. H. (1991). Demonstrating differential reinforcement by shaping classroom participation. Teaching of Psychology, 18, 239–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. R., & Henney, A. L. (1998). Student participation and instructor gender in the mixed-age college classroom. Journal of Higher Education, 69, 384–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. R., James, G. H., I. I. I., & Taylor, D. R. (2002). The consolidation of responsibility in the mixed-age college classroom. Teaching Sociology, 30, 214–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, L. C., & Chase, C. I. (1992). Developing and using tests effectively: A guide for faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzow, F., & Eison, J. (1990). Grades: Their influence on students and faculty. In M. D. Svinicki (Ed.), The changing face of college teaching. New directions for teaching and learning no. 42. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. C. (2008). The “why” of class participation: A question worth asking. College Teaching, 56, 59–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainkar, A. V. (2008). A student-empowered system for measuring and weighing participation in class discussion. Journal of Management Education, 32, 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCleary, D. F., Foster, L. N., & Williams, R. L. (2010). Cognitive predictors of class participation. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Sommer, R., & Sommer, B. A. (2007). Credit for comments, comments for credit. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 104–106.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. L. Williams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krohn, K.R., Aspiranti, K.B., Foster, L.N. et al. Effects of Self-Recording and Contingent Credit on Balancing Participation Across Students. J Behav Educ 19, 134–155 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-010-9105-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-010-9105-6

Keywords

  • Class participation
  • Large discussion classes
  • College level
  • Contingent credit
  • Self-recording