Journal of Behavioral Education

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 79–92 | Cite as

Comparing Brief and Extended Wait-Time During Small Group Instruction for Children with Challenging Behavior

Original Paper

Abstract

This preliminary study compared brief (1 s) and extended (4 s) wait-time on response opportunities, academic responses, accuracy, and disruptive behavior of two children with challenging behavior during small group instruction. Brief wait-time increased children’s response opportunities, academic responses, and accuracy in comparison to extended wait-time. Though variable, brief wait-time also decreased children’s disruptive behavior. Findings differ from previous research, which found performance improvements with extended wait-time for children with moderate to profound cognitive disabilities. Limitations of the study and future research suggestions are discussed.

Keywords

Wait-time Teacher pacing Challenging behavior Effective instruction Behavioral disorders 

References

  1. Brown, L. L., & Hammill, D. D. (1990). Behavior rating profile: An ecological approach to behavioral assessment. Austin, TX: Pro-ed, Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Carnine, D. W. (1976). Effects of two teacher presentation rates on off-task behavior, answering correctly, and participation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 199–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlin, M. T., Soraci, S., Goldman, A. L., & McIlvane, W. (1995). Visual search in unidimensional arrays: A comparison between subjects with and without mental retardation. Intelligence, 21, 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (1987). Applied behavior analysis. Columbus: Merrill.Google Scholar
  5. Darch, C., & Gersten, R. (1985). The effects of teacher presentation rate and praise on LD students’ oral reading performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 295–303.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Duker, P. C., Van Doeselaar, C., & Verstraten, A. (1993). The effect of response delay on correct responding to instructions during communicative gesture training. Education & Training in Mental Retardation, 28, 327–332.Google Scholar
  7. Dunlap, G., Clarke, S., Jackson, M., & Wright, S. (1995). Self-monitoring of classroom behaviors with students exhibiting emotional and behavioral challenges. School Psychology Quarterly, 10, 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunlap, G., Dyer, K., & Koegel, R. L. (1983). Autistic self-stimulation and intertrial interval duration. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88, 194–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dyer, K., Christian, W. P., & Luce, S. C. (1982). The role of response delay in improving the discrimination performance of autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 231–240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Engelmann, S., & Osborn, J. (1999). Language for Learning teacher’s guide. Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  11. Falk, K. B., & Wehby, J. H. (2001) The effects of peer-assisted learning strategies on the beginning reading skills of young children with emotional or behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 26, 344–359.Google Scholar
  12. Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. (2003). Looking in classrooms (9th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  13. Gresham, F. M., Cook, C. R., Crews, S. D., & Kern, L. (2004). Social skills training for children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders: Validity considerations and future directions. Behavioral Disorders, 30, 32–46.Google Scholar
  14. Heward, W. L. (1994). Three “low-tech” strategies for increasing the frequency of active student response during group instruction. In R. Gardiner III, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. Eshleman, & T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 283–320). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  15. Kauchak, D. K., Eggen, P., & Carter, C. (2002). Introduction to teaching: Becoming a professional. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Kauffman, J. M. (2004). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Single case designs for educational research. Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  18. Koegel, R. L., Dunlap, G., & Dyer, K. (1980). Intertrial interval duration and learning in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 91–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee, J., O’Shea, L. J., & Dykes, M. K. (1987). Teacher wait-time: Performance of developmentally delayed and non-delayed young children. Education & Training in Mental Retardation, 22, 176–184.Google Scholar
  20. Lowry, P. W., & Ross, L. E. (1975). Severely retarded children as impulsive responders: Improved performance with response delay. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 80, 133–138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nelson, J. R, Benner, G. J., Lane, K., & Smith, B. W. (2004). Academic achievement of K-12 students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptional Children, 71, 59–73.Google Scholar
  22. Rosenberg, M. S., Wilson, R., Maheady, L., & Sindelar, P. T. (2004). Educating students with behavior disorders (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Rowe, M. B. (1974). Wait-time and rewards as instructional variables, their influence on language, logic, and fate control. Part one. Wait-time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11, 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rowe, M. B. (1987). Wait time: Slowing down may be a way of speeding up. American Educator, 11, 38–43.Google Scholar
  25. Skinner, C. H., Smith, E. S., & McLean, J. E. (1994). The effects of intertrial interval duration on sight-word learning rates in children with behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 19, 98–107.Google Scholar
  26. Sutherland, K. S., & Wehby, J. H. (2001). Exploring the relationship between increased opportunities to respond to academic requests and the academic and behavioral outcomes of students with EBD: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tobin, K. (1987). The role of wait time in higher cognitive level learning. Review of Educational Research, 57, 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tincani, M., Ernsbarger, S., Harrison, T. J., & Heward. W. L. (2005). Effects of two instructional paces on pre-K children’s participation rate, accuracy, and off-task behavior in the Language for Learning Program. Journal of Direct Instruction, 5, 97–109.Google Scholar
  29. Valcante, G., Roberson, W., Reid, W. R., & Wolking W. D. (1989). Effects of wait-time and intertrial interval durations on learning by children with multiple handicaps. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 43–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Waldron-Soler, K. M., & Osborn, J. (2004). Language. In N. E. Marchand-Martella, T. A. Slocum, & R. C. Martella (Eds.), Introduction to Direct Instruction (pp. 66–99). Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Special EducationUniversity of NevadaLas VegasUSA

Personalised recommendations