Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Self-graphing on Written Expression of Fourth Grade Students with High-Incidence Disabilities

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of self-graphing on the writing of 3 fourth grade students with high-incidence disabilities. Measures of written expression included total number of words written and number of correct word sequences. During intervention, students self-graphed their total number of words written in response to a timed story starter. A functional relationship was found between the self-graphing intervention and the total words written and number of correct word sequences. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AIMSweb (2007). AIMSweb growth table: Written expression. Eden Prairie, MN: EdFormation, Inc. http://www.aimsweb.com/ norms/written_espression.htm. Retrieved 2 Feb 2007.

  • Brooks, A., Todd, A. W., Tofflemoyer, S., & Horner, R. H. (2003). Use of functional assessment and a self-management system to increase academic engagement and work completion. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 5, 144–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis. Columbus: Merrill Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deno, S. L., Marston, D., & Mirkin, P. (1982). Valid measurement procedures for continuous evaluation of written expression. Exceptional Children, 48, 368–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiGangi, S. A., Maag, J. W., & Rutherford, R. B. Jr. (1991). Self-graphing of on-task behavior: Enhancing the reactive effects of self-monitoring on on-task behavior and academic performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 221–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, T., & Chislett, M. (1999). Adventures in language: level II fun with language. New York: J/P Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englert, C. A., Raphael, T. E., Anderson, L. M., Anthony, H. M., Fear, K. L., & Gregg, S. L. (1988). A case for writing intervention: Strategies for informational text. Learning Disabilities Focus, 3(2), 98–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espin, C. A., Shin, J., Deno, S. L., Skare, S., Robinson, S., & Benner, B. (2000). Identifying indicators of written expression proficiency for middle school students. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 140–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching expressive writing to students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 251–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Harris, K. R., MacArthur, C. A., & Schwartz, S. (1991). Writing and writing instruction for students with learning disabilities: Review of a research program. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 89–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, P. L., Miller, K. A., Venn, M. L., Thomas, K., & House, S. (2002). Self-graphing to success: Computerized data management. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. R., Graham, S. R., McElroy, K., & Hamby, R. S. (1994). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of performance: Replication and cross task comparison studies. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houck, C. K., & Billingsley, B. S. (1989). Written expression of students with and without learning disabilities: Differences across the grades. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 561–567.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kasper-Ferguson, S., & Moxley, A. (2002). Developing a writing package with student graphing of fluency. Education and Treatment of Children, 25, 249–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levendoski, L. S., & Cartledge, G. (2000). Self-monitoring for elementary school children with serious emotional disturbances: Classroom applications for increased academic responding. Behavioral Disorders, 25, 211–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Hamel, C. M. (2003). Writing issues in college students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of the literature from 1990 to 2000. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K. F., & Manno, C. (1995). Use of a check-off system to improve middle school students’ story compositions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 139–150.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moxley, R. A., & Lutz, P. A. (1995). Self-recorded word counts of freewriting in grades 1–4. Education & Treatment of Children, 18, 138–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomer, P. L., & Barenbaum, E. M. (1991). The written composing ability of children with learning disabilities: A review of the literature from 1980–1990. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 578–593.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Persky, H. R., Daane, M. C., & Jin, Y. (2002). The nation’s report card: Writing 2002. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. http://www.nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2003529. Retrieved 2 Feb 2007.

  • Powell-Smith, K. A., & Shinn, M. R. (2004). Administration and scoring of written expression curriculum-based measurement (WE-CBM) for use in general outcome measurement. Eden Prairie: EdFormation, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooney, K., Polloway, E. A., & Hallahan, D. P. (1985). The use of self-monitoring procedures with low IQ learning disabled students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 384–389.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shimabukuro, S. M., Prater, M. A., Jenkins, A., & Edelen-Smith, P. (1999). The effects of self-monitoring of academic performance on students with learning disabilities and ADD/ADHD. Education and Treatment of Children, 22, 397–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tindal, G., & Parker, R. (1991). Identifying measures for evaluating written expression. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 6, 211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trammel, D. L., Schloss, P. J., & Alper, S. (1994). Using self-recording, evaluation, and graphing to increase completion of homework assignments. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 75–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Videen, J., Deno, S. L., & Marston, D. (1982). Correct word sequences: A valid indicator of writing proficiency in written expression (Research Rep. No. 84). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler individual achievement test, 2nd ed. (WIAT-II). The Psychological Corporation, 2001.

  • Wechsler, D. (2001). Wechsler intelligence scale for children, 3rd. ed. (WISC-III). The Psychological Corporation.

  • Weissenburger, J. W., & Espin, C. A. (2005). Curriculum-based measures of writing across grade levels. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson tests of achievement (WJ III). Itasca: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moira Konrad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stotz, K.E., Itoi, M., Konrad, M. et al. Effects of Self-graphing on Written Expression of Fourth Grade Students with High-Incidence Disabilities. J Behav Educ 17, 172–186 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-007-9055-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-007-9055-9

Keywords

Navigation