Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Causing Students to Choose More Language Arts Work: Enhancing the Validity of the Additive Interspersal Procedure

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on the additive interspersal procedure was extended by exposing seventh-grade students to curricula-based (e.g., educationally valid) language arts assignments. In Experiment I, each student was given a control language arts assignment containing 20 discrete target items and an experimental assignment containing 24 equivalent target items, plus eight interspersed briefer items. After working on both assignments for 10 minutes, significantly more students chose a new experimental assignment for homework. Individual analysis showed that 85% of the students preferred or chose the assignment associated with higher discrete task completion rates. In Experiment II, students completed both assignments. Results extended previous research by showing that even after expending more effort to complete the 20% more target items plus the additional interspersed items on the experimental assignments, significantly more students chose an experimental assignment for homework. Applied and theoretical implications are discussed along with limitations of the current study and directions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aparicio, C. F. (2001). Overmatching in rats: The barrier choice paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 75, 93–106.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying human behavior change. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baum, W. M. (1974). On two types of deviation from the Matching Law: Bias and undermatching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 231–242.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Billington, E. J., & Ditommaso, N. M. (2003). Demonstrations and applications of the matching law in education. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Billington, E. J., Skinner, C. H., & Cruchon, N. M. (in press). Improving sixth-grade students perceptions of high-effort assignments by assigning more work: Interaction of additive interspersal and assignment effort on assignment choice. Journal of School Psychology.

  6. Billington, E. J., Skinner, C. H., Hutchins, H., & Malone, J. C. (2004). Varying problem effort and choice: Using the interspersal technique to influence choice towards more effortful assignments. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13, 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Billington, E. J., & Skinner, C. H. (May, 2002). Influencing perceptions of time by altering task completion rates. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Association for Applied Behavior Analysis: Toronto.

  8. Cates, G. L., & Skinner, C. H. (2000). Getting remedial mathematics students to prefer homework with 20% and 40% more problems: An investigation of the strength of the interspersal procedure. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cates, G. L., Skinner, C. H., Watkins, C. E., Rhymer, K. M., McNeill, S. L., & McCurdy, M. (1999). Effects of interspersing additional brief math problems on student performance and perception of math assignments: Getting students to prefer to do more work. Journal of Behavioral Education, 9, 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cates, G. L., Skinner, C. H., Watson, T. W., Meadows, T. J., Weaver, A., & Jackson, B. (2003). Instructional effectiveness and instructional efficiency as considerations for data-based decision making: An evaluation of interspersing procedures. School Psychology Review, 32, 601–616.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cooke, N. L., Guzaukas, R., Pressley, J. S., & Kerr, K. (1993). Effects of using a ratio of new items to review items during drill and practice: Three experiments. Education and Treatment of Children, 16, 213–234.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dunlap, G., & Kern, L. (1996). Modifying instructional activities to promote desirable behavior: A conceptual and practical framework. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 297–312.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J. C., & Hall, R. V. (1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic performance. In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, J. Trap-Porter, & D. S. Hill (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 58–88). Columbus, OH: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Haley-James, S., & Stewing, J. W. (1990). Houghton Mifflin English. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Haring, N. G., & Eaton, M. D. (1978). Systematic instructional technology: An instructional hierarchy. In N. G. Haring, T. C. Lovitt, M. D. Eaton, & C. L. Hansen (Eds.), The fourth R: Research in the classroom (pp. 23–40). Columbus OH: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243–266.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hutchins, H., Skinner, C. H., & Billington, E. J. (May, 2002). The mitigating effects of additional item effort during the interspersal procedure: More than problem completion rates. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis: Toronto.

  18. Killeen, P. R., & Fetterman J. G. (1988). A behavioral theory of timing. Psychological Review, 95, 274–295.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kratochwill, T. R., & Shernoff, E. S. (2004). Evidence-based practice: Promoting evidence-based interventions in school psychology. School Psychology Review, 33, 34–48.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Logan, P., & Skinner, C. H. (1998). Improving students' perceptions of a mathematics assignment by increasing problem completion rates: Is problem completion a reinforcing event? School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 322–331.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mace, F. C., McCurdy, B., & Quigley, E. A. (1990). A collateral effect of reward predicted by matching theory. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 197–205.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. MacQuarrie, L. L., Tucker, J. A., Burns, M. K., & Hartman, B. (2002). Comparison of retention rates using traditional, drill sandwich, and incremental rehearsal flash card methods. School Psychology Review, 31, 584–595.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Martens, B. K., & Houk, J. L. (1989). The application of Herrnstein's law of effect to disruptive and on-task behavior of a retarded adolescent girl. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 17–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Martin, J. J., Skinner, C. H., & Neddenriep, C. E. (2001). Extending research on the interspersal procedure to perceptions of continuous reading assignments: Applied and theoretical implications of a failure to replicate. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 391–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1990). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  26. McCurdy, M., Skinner, C. H., Grantham, K., & Watson, T. S. (2001). Increasing on-task behavior in an elementary student during mathematics seatwork by interspersing additional brief problems. School Psychology Review, 30, 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  27. McDowell, J. J. (1988). Matching theory in natural human environments. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 95–109.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Myers, D. L., & Myers, L. E. (1977). Undermatching: A reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 17, 367–380.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Myerson, J., & Hale, S. (1984). Practical implications of the Matching Law. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 367–380.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Neef, N. A., Shade, D., & Miller, M. S. (1994). Assessing the influential dimensions of reinforcers on choice in students with serious emotional disturbance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 575–583.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Penton-Voak, I. S., Edwards, H., Percival, A., & Wearden, J. H. (1996). Speeding up an internal clock in humans? Effects of click trains on subjective duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 307–320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Roberts, M. C., & Shapiro, E. S. (1996). Effects of instructional ratios on students' reading performance in a general education classroom. Journal of School Psychology, 34, 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Roberts, M. C., Turco, T. C., & Shapiro, E. S. (1991). Differential effects of fixed instructional ratios on students' progress in reading. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9, 308–318.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Skinner, C. H. (2002). An empirical analysis of interspersal research: Evidence, implications, and applications of the discrete task completion hypothesis. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 347–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Skinner, C. H., Fletcher, P. A., Wildmon, M., & Belfiore, P. J. (1996). Improving assignment preference through interspersing additional problems: Brief versus easy problem. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 427–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Skinner, C. H., Hall-Johnson, K., Skinner, A. L, Cates, G., Weber, J., & Johns, G. (1999). Enhancing perceptions of mathematics assignments by increasing relative rates of problem completion through the interspersal technique. Journal of Experimental Education, 68, 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Skinner, C. H., Hurst, K. L., Teeple, D. F., & Meadows, S. F. (2002). Increasing on-task behavior during mathematics independent seatwork in students with emotional disturbance by interspersing additional brief problems. Psychology in the Schools, 36, 647–659.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Skinner, C. H., Pappas, D. N., & Davis, K. A. (2005). Enhancing academic engagement: Providing opportunities for responding and influencing students to choose to respond. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 389–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Skinner, C. H., Robinson, S. L., Johns, G. A., Logan, P., & Belfiore, P. J. (1996). Applying Herrstein's Matching Law to influence students' choice to complete difficult academic tasks. The Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Skinner, C. H., Wallace, M. A., & Neddenriep, C. E. (2002). Academic Remediation: Educational application of research on assignment preference and choice. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 24, 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Staddon, J. E. R., & Higa, J. J. (1999). Time and memory: Towards a pacemaker-free theory of interval timing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71, 215–251.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Teeple, D. F., & Skinner, C. H. (2004). Enhancing grammar assignment perceptions by increasing assignment demands: An extension of interspersal research. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorder, 12, 120–127.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wildmon, M. E., Skinner, C. H., McCurdy, M., & Sims, S. (1999). Improving secondary students' perception of the “dreaded mathematics word problem assignment” by giving them more word problems. Psychology in the Schools, 36, 319–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wildmon, M., Skinner, C. H., & McDade, A. (1998). Interspersing additional brief, easy problems to increase assignment preference on mathematics reading problems. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 337–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wildmon, M. E., Skinner, C. H., Watson, T. S., & Garrett, L. S. (2004). Enhancing assignment perceptions in students with mathematics learning disabilities by including more work: An extension of interspersal research. School Psychology Quarterly, 19, 106–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Tennessee, Tennessee

    Sadonya F. Meadows & Christopher H. Skinner

  2. University of Tennessee, College of EHHS, Claxton Complex A-518, Knoxville, TN, 37996-3452

    Christopher H. Skinner

Authors
  1. Sadonya F. Meadows
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher H. Skinner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher H. Skinner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meadows, S.F., Skinner, C.H. Causing Students to Choose More Language Arts Work: Enhancing the Validity of the Additive Interspersal Procedure. J Behav Educ 14, 227–247 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-005-8648-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-005-8648-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation