Abstract
Research suggests component skill performance has a strong positive relationship with composite skill performance. This study examined the association between accuracy and fluency for the component-composite relationship within multiplication. One hundred and fifty-seven fifth-graders did one-minute assessments for single-digit, and multi-digit multiplication problems. The results demonstrated the students achieved high levels of accuracy but low levels of fluency. Strong correlations between the component-composite skill fluency suggest that fluent component skills may have a significant role in composite skill performance. Moderate/low correlations between component and composite skill accuracy indicate that more than one skill component may contribute to composite skill acquisition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrett, B. (1979). Communitization and the measured message of normal behavior. In R. York & E. Edgar (Eds.), Teaching the Severely Handicapped (Vol. 4, pp. 301–318). Columbus, OH: Special Press.
Berens, K., Boyce, T. E., Berens, N. M., Doney, J. K., & Kenzer, A. L. (2003). A technology for evaluation relations between response frequency and academic performance outcomes. Journal of Precision teaching and Celeration, 19(1), 20–34.
Carnine, C. W., Silbert, J., Kameenui, E. J., & Tarver, S. G. (2004). Direct instruction reading (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall/Merrill.
Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 163–197.
Bucklin, B. R., Dickinson, A. M., & Brethower, D. M. (2000). A comparison of the effects of fluency training and accuracy training on application and retention. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 13(3), 140–163.
Carnine, D. (1980). Preteaching versus concurrent teaching of the component skills of a multiplication algorithm. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 11, 375–378.
Christenson, S. L., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Thurlow, M. L. (1989). Critical instructional factors for students with mild handicaps: An integrative review. Remedial and Special Education, 10(5), 21–31.
Eaton, M. D. (1978). Data decisions and evaluation. In N. G. Haring, T. C. Lovitt, M. D. Eaton, & C. L. Hansen (Eds.), The forth R: Research in the classroom (pp. 167–190). Columbus, Oh: Merrill.
Evans, S. S., & Evans, W. H. (1985). Frequencies that ensure skill competency. Journal of Precision Teaching, 6(2), 25–30.
Evans, S. S., Mercer, C. D., & Evans, W. H. (1983). The relationship of frequency to subsequent skill acquisition. Journal of Precision Teaching, 4(2), 28–34.
Hanushek, E. A., & Kimko, D. (2000). Schooling, labor-force quality, and the growth of nations. American Economic Review, 90(5), 1184–1208.
Haughton, E. C. (1980). Practicing practices: Learning by activity. Journal of Precision Teaching, 1(3), 3–20.
Johnson, K. R. (1996). Morningside mathematics fluency: Math facts (3rd ed.). Seattle, WA: Morningside Press.
Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. J. (1992). Breaking the structuralist barrier: Literacy and numeracy with fluency. American Psychologist, 47(11), 1475–1490.
Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. J. (1994). The Morningside model of generative instruction. In R. Gardner, D. Sainato, J. Cooper, T. Heron, W. Heward, J. Eshleman, & T. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 173–197). Belmont, CA: Brooks-Cole.
Kamii, C., & Joseph, L. (1988). Teaching place value and double-column addition. Arithmetic Teacher, 35(6), 48–52.
Koorland, M. A., Keel, M. C., & Ueberhorst, P. (1990). Setting aims for precision learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 22(3), 64–66.
Kubina, R. M., Young, A. E., & Kilwein, M. (2004). Examining an effect of fluency: Application of oral word segmentation and letters sounds for spelling. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(1), 17–23.
Kubina, R. M., & Lin, F. (2003). [College student performance in multi-digit multiplication]. Unpublished raw data.
Kubina, R. M., & Morrison, R. (2000). Fluency education. Behavior and Social Issues, 10, 83–99.
Lorenz, J, H. (1982). On some psychological aspects of mathematics achievement assessment and classroom interaction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 13(1), 1–19.
Lovitt, T. C. (1978). Arithmetic. In N. G. Haring, T. C. Lovitt, M. D. Eaton, & C. L. Hansen (Eds.), The forth R: Research in the classroom (pp. 127–166). Columbus, Oh: Merrill.
McDowell, C., & Keenan, M. (2001). Cumulative dysfluency: Still evident in our classrooms, despite what we know. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 17(2), 1–6.
McDowell, C., & Keenan, M. (2002). Comparison of two teaching structures examining the effects of component fluency on the performance of related skills. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 18(2), 16–29.
McDowell, C., Keenan, M., & Kerr, K. P. (2002). Comparing levels of dysfluency among students with mild learning difficulties and typical students. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 18(2), 37–48.
McDowell, C., McIntyre, C., Bones, R., & Keenan, M. (2002). Teaching component skills to improve golf swing. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 18(2), 61–66.
Mercer, C. D., Campbell, K. U., Miller, M. D., Mercer, K. D., & Lane, H. B. (2000). Reading fluency intervention for middle schools with specific learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 15(4), 179–189.
Mercer, C. D., & Mercer, A. R. (2001). Teaching students with learning problems (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall/Merrill.
Mercer, C. D., Mercer, A. R., & Evans, S. (1982). The use of frequency in establishing instructional aims. Journal of Precision Teaching, 3(3), 57–63.
McIntyre, S. B., Test, D. W., Cooke, N. L., & Beattie, J. (1991). Using count-bys to increase multiplication facts fluency. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14(2), 82–88.
National Center for Education Statistics (2000). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Mathematics 2000 major reports. Retrieved January 29, 2003, from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/mathematics/results/index.asp
New York City Board of Education (2000a). Impact of teacher certification on reading and mathematics performance in elementary and middle schools in New York City. Flash research report &2. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED451315).
New York City Board of Education (2000b). Analyses of performance of extended-time and non-extended time SURR school. Flash research report &1. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED451314).
Pennsylvania Department of Education (2004). Data file documentation: Pennsylvania system of school assessment–school and district report cards. Retrieved March 30, 2004, from http://www.paprofiles.org/pa0102/datafiles/datafiledocumentation.htm
Rhymer, K. N., Skinner, C. H., Henington, C., D’Reaux, R. A., & Sims S. (1998). Effects of explicit timing on mathematics problem completion rates in African-American third-grade elementary students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31(4), 673–677.
Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. C. Wittrock, (Ed.) The handbook of research on teaching (pp. 376–391). New York: Macmillan.
Shapiro, E. S. (1996). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
Smith, D. D. (1981). Teaching the learning disabled. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Smyth, P., & Keenan, M. (2002). Compound performance: The role of free and controlled operant components. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 18(2), 3–15.
Stein, M., Silbert, J., & Carnine, D. (1997). Designing effect mathematics instruction: A direct instruction approach (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) (1999). TIMSS 1999 International Mathematics Report. Retrieved February 10, 2003 from http://isc.bc.edu/timss1999i/math_achievement_report.html
US Department of Education (2003). No child left behind. Retrieved May 16, 2003, from http://www.nclb.gov/index.html
Van de Walle, J. A. (1990). Elementary school mathematics: Teaching developmentally. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Van Houten, R., & Thompson, C. (1976). The effects of explicit timing on math performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 227–230.
Wood, S., Burke, L., Kunzelmann, H., & Koenig, C. (1978). Functional criteria in basic math skill proficiency. Journal of Special Education Technology, 2(2), 29–36.
Wu, H. (1999). Basic skills versus conceptual understanding: A bogus dichotomy in mathematics education. American Educator, 23(3), 14–19, 50–52.
Zhang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2002). Modeling school and district effects in the math achievement of Delaware students measured by DSTP: A preliminary application of hierarchal linear modeling in accountability study. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED468962).
Zaner-Bloser . (1999). Handwriting with continuous-stroke alphabet. Columbus, OH: Zaner-Bloser.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, FY., Kubina, R.M. A Preliminary Investigation of the Relationship Between Fluency and Application for Multiplication. J Behav Educ 14, 73–87 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-005-2703-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-005-2703-z