Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  1. Home
  2. Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes
  3. Article
A translational study “case report” on the small molecule “energy blocker” 3-bromopyruvate (3BP) as a potent anticancer agent: from bench side to bedside
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

Role of PKM2 in directing the metabolic fate of glucose in cancer: a potential therapeutic target

24 May 2018

Gustav van Niekerk & Anna-Mart Engelbrecht

3-Phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase: a potential target for cancer treatment

18 March 2021

Mingxue Li, Canrong Wu, … Hua Li

3-Bromopyruvate-mediated MCT1-dependent metabolic perturbation sensitizes triple negative breast cancer cells to ionizing radiation

14 October 2021

Irini Skaripa-Koukelli, David Hauton, … Katherine A. Vallis

An inhibitor of oxidative phosphorylation exploits cancer vulnerability

11 June 2018

Jennifer R. Molina, Yuting Sun, … Joseph R. Marszalek

Pyruvate Kinase M2: a Metabolic Bug in Re-Wiring the Tumor Microenvironment

10 June 2019

Mohd Rihan, Lakshmi Vineela Nalla, … Amit Khairnar

Treatment against glucose-dependent cancers through metabolic PFKFB3 targeting of glycolytic flux

14 April 2022

Brandon C. Jones, Paula R. Pohlmann, … Surojeet Sengupta

Targeting Mitochondrial Oxidative Phosphorylation in Glioblastoma Therapy

06 September 2021

Zhihao Wu, Winson S. Ho & Rongze Lu

Antitumor effects of the small molecule DMAMCL in neuroblastoma via suppressing aerobic glycolysis and targeting PFKL

24 November 2021

Simeng Zhang, Zhongyan Hua, … Zhijie Li

Dichloroacetate and PX-478 exhibit strong synergistic effects in a various number of cancer cell lines

30 April 2021

Jonas Parczyk, Jérôme Ruhnau, … Andreas Klein

Download PDF
  • Open Access
  • Published: 11 February 2012

A translational study “case report” on the small molecule “energy blocker” 3-bromopyruvate (3BP) as a potent anticancer agent: from bench side to bedside

  • Y. H. Ko nAff2,
  • H. A. Verhoeven3,
  • M. J. Lee4,
  • D. J. Corbin5,
  • T. J. Vogl6 &
  • …
  • P. L. Pedersen1,7,8 

Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes volume 44, pages 163–170 (2012)Cite this article

  • 4949 Accesses

  • 123 Citations

  • 56 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

The small alkylating molecule, 3-bromopyruvate (3BP), is a potent and specific anticancer agent. 3BP is different in its action from most currently available chemo-drugs. Thus, 3BP targets cancer cells’ energy metabolism, both its high glycolysis (“Warburg Effect”) and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. This inhibits/ blocks total energy production leading to a depletion of energy reserves. Moreover, 3BP as an “Energy Blocker”, is very rapid in killing such cells. This is in sharp contrast to most commonly used anticancer agents that usually take longer to show a noticeable effect. In addition, 3BP at its effective concentrations that kill cancer cells has little or no effect on normal cells. Therefore, 3BP can be considered a member, perhaps one of the first, of a new class of anticancer agents. Following 3BP’s discovery as a novel anticancer agent in vitro in the Year 2000 (Published in Ko et al. Can Lett 173:83–91, 2001), and also as a highly effective and rapid anticancer agent in vivo shortly thereafter (Ko et al. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 324:269–275, 2004), its efficacy as a potent anticancer agent in humans was demonstrated. Here, based on translational research, we report results of a case study in a young adult cancer patient with fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma. Thus, a bench side discovery in the Department of Biological Chemistry at Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine was taken effectively to bedside treatment at Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt/Main Hospital, Germany. The results obtained hold promise for 3BP as a future cancer therapeutic without apparent cyto-toxicity when formulated properly.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

References

  • Abeysinghe SI, Baker PJ, Rice DW, Rodgers HF, Stillman TJ, Ko YH, McFadden BA, Nimmo BG (1991) J Mol Biol 220:13–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bustamante E, Pedersen PL (1977) Proc Natl Acad Sci 74:3735–3739

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guterman L (2011) Chem Eng News 89:15–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Ido T, Wan CN, Casella V, Fowler JS, Wolf AP, Reivich M, Kuhl DE (1978) J Lab Comp Radiopharma 14:175–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis LM (2011) Chem Eng News 89:15–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Ko YH, McFadden BA (1990) Arch Biochem Biophys 278:373–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ko YH, Pedersen PL, Geschwind JF (2001) Cancer Lett 173:83–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ko YH, Smith BL, Wang Y, Pomper MG, Rini DA, Torbenson MS, Hullihen J, Pedersen PL (2004) Biochem Biophys Res Commun 324:269–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathupala SP, Ko YH, Pedersen PL (2009) Semin Cancer Biol 19:17–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathupala SP, Ko YH, Pedersen PL (2010) Biochim Biophys Acta 1797:1225–1230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meloche HP, Monti CT (1967) Biochemistry 6:2273–2280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen PL (1978) Prog Exp Tumor Res 22:190–274

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen PL (2007a) J Bioenerg Biomemb 39:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen PL (2007b) J Bioenerg Biomemb 39:211–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Staub M, Denes G (1967) Biochim Biophys Acta 132:519–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburg O (1956) Science 124:269–270

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes
  1. Y. H. Ko

    Present address: Cancer Cure Med LLC, 300 Redland Court, Suite 212, Owings Mills, MD, 21117, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, 725 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205-2185, USA

    P. L. Pedersen

  2. Bioscience, Plant Research International, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    H. A. Verhoeven

  3. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 28 Yungun-dong, Chongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, South Korea

    M. J. Lee

  4. Oncology Foundation, New York, NY, USA

    D. J. Corbin

  5. Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt / Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    T. J. Vogl

  6. Department of Oncology and Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Building, 401 North Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA

    P. L. Pedersen

  7. Center for Metabolism and Obesity Research, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

    P. L. Pedersen

Authors
  1. Y. H. Ko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. A. Verhoeven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. J. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. J. Corbin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T. J. Vogl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. P. L. Pedersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. L. Pedersen.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ko, Y.H., Verhoeven, H.A., Lee, M.J. et al. A translational study “case report” on the small molecule “energy blocker” 3-bromopyruvate (3BP) as a potent anticancer agent: from bench side to bedside. J Bioenerg Biomembr 44, 163–170 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10863-012-9417-4

Download citation

  • Received: 09 January 2012

  • Accepted: 14 January 2012

  • Published: 11 February 2012

  • Issue Date: February 2012

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10863-012-9417-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • 3-bromopyruvate
  • Cancer
  • Liver cancer
  • Fibrolamellar carcinoma
  • Mitochondria
  • Warburg Effect
  • Hexokinase 2
  • Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.