Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using a Variant of the Situational Judgment Test to Examine Stress Reactivity Processes: Within-Person Relationships and Relationships Involving BIS and BAS

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Classic views of stress emphasize its links to fight or flight motivation, but very few studies have attempted to model these relationships among human beings and the relevant connections have been challenged. The present two studies (total N = 257) used a scenario-based method to examine relations among stress-related thoughts, feelings, and behaviors in response to a wide range of situational descriptions. Multilevel analyses of responses revealed strong within-person relationships, such as between estimations of stress and tendencies toward freezing, fleeing, and fighting. Individual differences in BIS motivation were predictive of stronger within-person relationships linking stress to freezing and fleeing, whereas individual differences in BAS motivation were more predictive of tendencies related to anger and fighting. The results provide novel support for biological models of stress reactivity and attest to the benefits of modeling both between- and within-person stress-related processes using a variant of the situational judgment test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnsten, A. F. T. (2009). Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 410–422

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Balconi, M., Falbo, L., & Brambilla, E. (2009). BIS/BAS responses to emotional cues: Self report, autonomic measure and alpha band modulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 858–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L. F. (2006). Are emotions natural kinds? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 28–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, A., Schmitt, M., Perugini, M., Johnson, W., Blum, G., Borkenau, P., et al. (2017). Integrating personality structure, personality process, and personality development. European Journal of Personality, 31, 503–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, N., & Wood, R. E. (2017). Editorial: Dynamic personality science. Integrating between-person stability and within-person change. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, ArtID: 1486

  • Berkowitz, L. (1983). Aversively stimulated aggression: Some parallels and differences in research with animals and humans. American Psychologist, 38, 1135–1144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, D. C., Hynd, A. L., Minke, K. A., Minemoto, T., & Blanchard, R. J. (2001). Human defensive behaviors to threat scenarios show parallels to fear- and anxiety-related defense patterns of non-human mammals. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 761–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, N., & Zuckerman, A. (1995). A framework for studying personality in the stress process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 890–892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bracha, H. S. (2004). Freeze, flight, fight, fright, faint: Adaptationist perspectives on the acute stress response spectrum. CNS Spectrums, 9, 679–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, W. B. (1929). Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear, and rage (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Appleton

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 183–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Johnson, S. L. (2018). Impulsive reactivity to emotion and vulnerability to psychopathology. American Psychologist, 73, 1067–1078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., Johnson, S. L., & Joormann, J. (2009). Two-mode models of self-regulation as a tool for conceptualizing effects of the serotonin system in normal behavior and diverse disorders. Current Directions in Psychology Science, 18, 195–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervone, D. (1991). The two disciplines of personality psychology: Review of Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. Psychological Science, 2, 371–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claes, L., Vertommen, S., Smits, D., & Bijttebier, P. (2009). Emotional reactivity and self-regulation in relation to personality disorders. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 948–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coan, J. A. (2010). Emergent ghosts of the emotion machine. Emotion Review, 2, 274–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A., Gomez, R., & Buck, E. (2008). The relationships between the BIS and BAS, anger and responses to anger. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 403–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corr, P. J., DeYoung, C. G., & McNaughton, N. (2013). Motivation and personality: A neuropsychological perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 158–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, C. P., Copping, L. T., & Campbell, A. (2011). Sex differences in impulsivity: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 97–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Downey, G., & Feldman, S. I. (1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1327–1343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fanselow, M. S. (1994). Neural organization of the defensive behavior system responsible for fear. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 429–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanselow, M. S. (2018). Emotion, motivation and function. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 19, 105–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleeson, W. (2004). Moving personality beyond the person-situation debate: The challenge and the opportunity of within-person variability. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 83–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleeson, W., & Jayawickreme, E. (2015). Whole Trait Theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 82–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2, 300–319

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fresco, D. M., Coles, M. E., Heimberg, R. G., Liebowitz, M. R., Hami, S., Stein, M. B., et al. (2001). The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale: A comparison of the psychometric properties of self-report and clinician-administered formats. Psychological Medicine, 31, 1025–1035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N. H. (2010). Impulsive action and motivation. Biological Psychology, 84, 570–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Funder, D. C. (2006). Toward a resolution of the personality triad: Persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 21–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funder, D. C. (2009). Persons, behaviors and situations: An agenda for personality psychology in the postwar era. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 120–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendolla, G. H. E. (2017). Comment: Do emotions influence action?-Of course, they are hypo-phenomena of motivation. Emotion Review, 9, 348–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin, T. E., Hashemi, M. M., van Ast, V., & Roelofs, K. (2016). Ready and waiting: Freezing as active action preparation under threat. Neuroscience Letters, 619, 182–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, D. S., & Kopin, I. J. (2007). Evolution of concepts of stress. Stress: The International Journal on the Biology of Stress, 10, 109–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gratz, K. L., & Tull, M. T. (2010). Emotion regulation as a mechanism of change in acceptance- and mindfulness-based treatments. In R. A. Baer (Ed.), Assessing mindfulness and acceptance processes in clients: Illuminating the theory and practice of change (pp. 107–133). Oakland, CA: Context Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. (1991). Neural systems, emotion, and personality. In J. Madden (Ed.), Neurobiology of learning, emotion, and affect (pp. 273–306). New York, NY: Raven Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hareli, S., & Parkinson, B. (2008). What’s social about social emotions? Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 38, 131–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon-Jones, E. (2003). Anger and the behavioral approach system. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 995–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, L. A., Ahn, C., & Adolphs, R. (2015). Exploring the structure of human defensive responses from judgments of threat scenarios. Plos One, 10, e133682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollenstein, T., & Lanteigne, D. (2014). Models and methods of emotional concordance. Biological Psychology, 98, 1–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B., Moors, A., Sander, D., & Deonna, J. (2017). Emotion meets action: Towards an integration of research and theory. Emotion Review, 9, 295–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, J. A., McAuliffe, M. D., Morrow, M. T., & Romano, L. J. (2010). Reactive and proactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: Precursors, outcomes, processes, experiences, and measurement. Journal of Personality, 78, 95–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hundt, N. E., Brown, L. H., Kimbrel, N. A., Walsh, M. A., Nelson-Gray, R., & Kwapil, T. R. (2013). Reinforcement sensitivity theory predicts positive and negative affect in daily life. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 350–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hundt, N. E., Kimbrel, N. A., Mitchell, J. T., & Nelson-Gray, R. O. (2008). High BAS, but not low BIS, predicts externalizing symptoms in adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 565–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hundt, N. E., Mitchell, J. T., Kimbrel, N. A., & Nelson-Gray, R. O. (2010). The effect of behavioral inhibition and approach on normal social functioning. Individual Differences Research, 8, 246–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayawickreme, E., Fleeson, W., Beck, E. D., Baumert, A., & Adler, J. M. (2021). Personality dynamics. Personality Science, 2, 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, N. J., Kramer, A. M., Young, K. S., Echiverri-Cohen, A. M., Chat, I. K., Bookheimer, S. Y., et al. (2019). Evidence for a general factor of behavioral activation system sensitivity. Journal of Research in Personality, 79, 30–39

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. M., Tyrka, A. R., Anderson, G. M., Price, L. H., & Carpenter, L. L. (2008). Sex differences in emotional and physiological responses to the Trier Social Stress Test. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 39, 87–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khoshfetrat, A., Scully, D., & Fassbender, C. (in press). Effects of behavioral inhibition/activation systems on anger rumination and anger expression through Difficulty in Emotion Regulation. Personality and Individual Differences

  • Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K., & Hellhammer, D. H. (1993). The ‘Trier Social Stress Test’: A tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology, 28, 76–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuppens, P., Van Mechelen, I., & Rijmen, F. (2008). Toward disentangling sources of individual differences in appraisal and anger. Journal of Personality, 76, 969–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J. (1995). The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and attention. American Psychologist, 50, 372–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action. In P. J. Lang, R. F. Simons, & M. T. Balaban (Eds.), Attention and orienting: Sensory and motivational processes (pp. 97–135). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1998). Emotion, motivation, and anxiety: Brain mechanisms and psychophysiology. Biological Psychiatry, 44, 1248–1263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (edited by Dorwin Cartwright). Oxford, England: Harpers

    Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F., Schäpers, P., & Herde, C. N. (2021). Situational judgment tests: From low-fidelity simulations to alternative measures of personality and the person-situation interplay. In D. Wood, S. J. Read, P. D. Harms, & A. Slaughter (Eds.), Measuring and modeling persons and situations (pp. 285–311). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ma-Kellams, C., & Wu, M. S. (in press). Gender, behavioral inhibition/activation, and emotional reactions to negative natural and social events.Personality and Individual Differences

  • Mathieu, J. E., Aguinis, H., Culpepper, S. A., & Chen, G. (2012). Understanding and estimating the power to detect cross-level interaction effects in multilevel modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 951–966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McEwen, B. S., & Sapolsky, R. M. (1995). Stress and cognitive function. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5, 205–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mennin, D. S., Fresco, D. M., Heimberg, R. G., Schneier, F. R., Davies, S. O., & Liebowitz, M. R. (2002). Screening for social anxiety disorder in the clinical setting: Using the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 16, 661–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moors, A. (2013). On the causal role of appraisal in emotion. Emotion Review, 5, 132–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motowidlo, S. J., Dunnette, M. D., & Carter, G. W. (1990). An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 640–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mussel, P., Gatzka, T., & Hewig, J. (2018). Situational judgment tests as an alternative measure of personality assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 34, 328–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nezlek, J. B. (2007). A multilevel framework for understanding relationships among traits, states, situations and behaviours. European Journal of Personality, 21, 789–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nezlek, J. B. (2012). Multilevel modeling for psychologists. In H. Cooper, et al. (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology (3 vol., pp. 219–241). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaten, M., & Cheng, K. (2005). Academic examination stress impairs self-control. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 254–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, D. B., Archer, J., & Wu, F. W. C. (2001). Measuring aggression: Self-reports, partner reports, and responses to provoking scenarios. Aggressive Behavior, 27, 79–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ode, S., Robinson, M. D., & Wilkowski, B. M. (2008). Can one’s temper be cooled? A role for agreeableness in moderating neuroticism’s influence on anger and aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 295–311

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., & Zapf, D. (2010). Diary studies in organizational research: An introduction and some practical recommendations. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9, 79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrott, W. G. (1995). But emotions are sometimes irrational. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 230–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, E., & Wong, P. T. (1990). The Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM): A multidimensional approach to cognitive appraisal. Stress Medicine, 6, 227–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persich, M. R., & Robinson, M. D. (2020). The person in context: Using situational judgment to gain insight into social functioning. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37, 302–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2001). Simulation, scenarios, and emotional appraisal: Testing the convergence of real and imagined reactions to emotional stimuli. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1520–1532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. D., Klein, R. J., & Persich, M. R. (2019). Personality traits in action: A cognitive behavioral version of the social cognitive paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 214–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. D., Traurig, E., & Klein, R. J. (in press). On looking versus leaping: A situated multilevel approach to trait anger and the anger-aggression relationship. Personality and Individual Differences

  • Roelofs, K. (2017). Freeze for action: Neurobiological mechanisms in animal and human freezing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 372, 20160206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, L. M., & Butler, L. K. (2007). Endocrinology of stress. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 20, 89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Canyas, R., Downey, G., Berenson, K., Ayduk, O., & Kang, N. J. (2010). Rejection sensitivity and the rejection-hostility link in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality, 78, 119–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. (2009). Emotion, core affect, and psychological construction. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 1259–1283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, I. G. (1984). Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interference: Reactions to tests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 929–938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scherbaum, C. A., & Ferreter, J. M. (2009). Estimating statistical power and required sample sizes for organizational research using multilevel modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 347–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 323–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smits, D. J. M., & Kuppens, P. (2005). The relations between anger, coping with anger, and aggression, and the BIS/BAS system. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 783–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suls, J., & Martin, R. (2005). The daily life of the garden-variety neurotic: Reactivity, stressor exposure, mood spillover, and maladaptive coping. Journal of Personality, 73, 1485–1510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., Hill-Barlow, D., Wagner, P. E., Marschall, D. E., Borenstein, J. K., Sanftner, J., et al. (1996). Assessing individual differences in constructive versus destructive responses to anger across the lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 780–796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tett, R. P., & Guterman, H. A. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 397–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tett, R. P., Toich, M. J., & Ozkum, S. B. (2021). Trait activation theory: A review of the literature and applications to five lines of personality dynamics research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8, 199–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomaka, J., Blascovich, J., Kelsey, R. M., & Leitten, C. L. (1993). Subjective, physiological, and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 248–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra, L., Bushman, B. J., & Koole, S. L. (2018). The facts on the furious: A brief review of the psychology of trait anger. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 98–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. (2009). Locating anger in the hierarchical structure of affect: Comment on Carver and Harmon-Jones (2009). Psychological Bulletin, 135, 205–208

  • Weekley, J. A., Hawkes, B., Guenole, N., & Ployhart, R. E. (2005). Low-fidelity simulations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 295–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westring, A. J. F., Oswald, F. L., Schmitt, N., Drzakowski, S., Imus, A., Kim, B., et al. (2009). Estimating trait and situational variance in a situational judgment test. Human Performance, 22, 44–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkowski, B. M., & Robinson, M. D. (2008). The cognitive basis of trait anger and reactive aggression: An integrative analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 3–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. E., Beckmann, N., Birney, D. P., Beckmann, J. F., Minbashian, A., & Chau, R. (2019). Situation contingent units of personality at work. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no funding for the present research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. North Dakota State University, Fargo, USA

    Roberta L. Irvin, Allison N. Roiger & Michael D. Robinson

Authors
  1. Roberta L. Irvin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Allison N. Roiger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael D. Robinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberta L. Irvin.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests:

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval:

These studies were performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the North Dakota State University Institutional Review Board (08-26-2021/IRB0003825).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Irvin, R.L., Roiger, A.N. & Robinson, M.D. Using a Variant of the Situational Judgment Test to Examine Stress Reactivity Processes: Within-Person Relationships and Relationships Involving BIS and BAS. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 45, 454–468 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-022-09999-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-022-09999-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation