Assessing Safety Behaviors in Fear of Storms: Validation of the Storm-Related Safety Behavior Scale
- 170 Downloads
With the exception of one self-report questionnaire assessing storm fear severity (Nelson et al. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36(1), 105–114, 2014), there are few brief published assessment tools to measure the cognitive, behavioral, and physical manifestations of storm fear. A principal feature of phobic disorders is the use of safety behaviors to alleviate distress. Safety behaviors are believed to perpetuate anxiety by preventing the disconfirmation of feared outcomes (Salkovskis Behavioural Psychotherapy, 19(1), 6–19, 1991). To date, no studies have examined the use of safety behaviors in storm fear. The purpose of the current research was to develop and validate the Storm-Related Safety Behavior Scale (SRSBS; Vorstenbosch and Antony 2017), a 24-item self-report scale that measures safety behavior use in adults with a fear of storms. Two studies examined the (1) factor structure, internal consistency, validity, and test-retest reliability of the SRSBS, as well as the frequency with which specific safety behaviors were endorsed; and (2) ability of the SRSBS to differentiate between a group of adults with low and high fear of storms after exposure to a virtual thunderstorm. Factor analysis revealed that the SRSBS is best captured by one factor. Results provided preliminary evidence of convergent and discriminant validity, as well as test-retest reliability. Finally, significant group differences were found between participants with high versus low fear of storms following a virtual thunderstorm. These findings demonstrate the value of the SRSBS for assessing safety behavior use.
KeywordsPhobia Storm Fear Safety behavior Measurement Factor analysis Virtual reality
Thank you to Kesla Forsythe for assistance with data collection.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Kirstyn L. Krause, Emma M. MacDonald, Alasdair Goodwill, Valerie Vorstenbosch and Martin M. Antony declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards and were approved by the University’s Research Ethics Board.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Botella, C., Baños, R. M., Guerrero, B., García-Palacios, A., Quero, S., & Alcañíz, M. (2006). Using a flexible virtual environment for treating a storm phobia. PsychNology Journal, 4(2), 129–144.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2. Auflage). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- First, M. B., Williams, J. B. W., Karg, R. S., & Spitzer, R. L. (2015). Structured clinical interview for DSM-5, research version 1.0.0 (SCID-5-RV). Arlington: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
- Horton, J. J., & Chilton, L. B. (2010). The labor economics of paid crowdsourcing. (2010). Proceedings of the 11th ACM conference on Electronic commerce. 978-1-60558-822-3. doi: 10.1145/1807342.1807376.
- Kline, P. (1999). The handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Nelson, A. L., & Antony, M. M. (2013). Storm fear questionnaire. Toronto: Ryerson University.Google Scholar
- Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision making, 5(5), 411–419.Google Scholar
- Sinclair, S. J., Siefert, C. J., Slavin-Mulford, J., Stein, M. B., Renna, M., & Blais, M. A. (2012). Psychometric evaluation and normative data for the depression, anxiety, and stress scales-21 (DASS-21) in a nonclinical sample of U.S. adults. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 35(3), 259–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stinson, F. S., Dawson, D. A., Chou, S. P., Smith, S., Goldstein, R. B., Ruan, W. J., & Grant, B. F. (2007). The epidemiology of DSM-IV specific phobia in the USA: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on alcohol and related conditions. Psychological Medicine, 37, 1046–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vorstenbosch, V., & Antony, M. M. (2017). Storm-related safety behavior scale. Toronto: Ryerson University.Google Scholar