Skip to main content
Log in

Reevaluating Suicidal Behaviors: Comparing Assessment Methods to Improve Risk Evaluations

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined suicide assessment validity by comparing methods of measuring current risk associated with past suicidal behaviors. Three independent samples (Ns = 359, 1007, and 713; aged 18–76 years) all included participants covering a broad spectrum of suicidality. Information theory, item response theory, general linear modeling, and linear regression modeling tested seven competing methods/models of assessing past suicidal behaviors in relation to current suicidality. In contrast to contemporary theories, ANOVA results showed suicide plans can indicate higher risk than suicide attempts when intent to die is higher. Contrary to popular practice, evidence demonstrated that defining risk by suicide ideation (yes/no), attempts or serious attempts (yes/no), are false dichotomies, were the least valid models tested, and failed to explain substantial explainable variance in suicidality/risk. A newly proposed model, differentiating behaviors with or without intent to die, was the most efficacious dichotomous method. However, as predicted, continuous variables were superior to dichotomous. The proposed suicidal barometer model (SBM) exhibited robust evidence as the best available model for evaluating suicidal behaviors in all samples (100 % probability), explaining 47–61 % of suicidality variance and provided incremental improvement in risk evaluations. Findings were consistent by sample, sex, age-group, ethnicity, and psychiatric history. This study, and related evidence, demonstrate that there is a clear and present need for updating measures, clinical training and core competencies, for valid assessment and risk formulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike, H. (1981). Likelihood of a model and information criteria. J Econ, 16(1), 3–14. doi:10.1016/0304–4076(81)90071–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alwin, D. F. (2007). Margins of error: A study of reliability in survey measurement. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baca-Garcia, E., Perez-Rodriguez, M. M., Oquendo, M. A., Keyes, K. M., Hasin, D. S., Grant, B. F., & Blanco, C. (2011). Estimating risk for suicide attempt: Are we asking the right questions?: Passive suicidal ideation as a marker for suicidal behavior. J Affect Disord, 134(1–3), 327–332. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.06.026.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Beautrais, A. L. (2003). Subsequent mortality in medically serious suicide attempts: A 5 year follow-up. Aust N Z J Psychiatry, 37(5), 595–599.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, R. W., Morris, J. B., & Beck, A. T. (1974). Cross-validation of the Suicidal Intent Scale. Psychol Rep, 34(2), 445–446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Kovacs, M., & Weissman, A. (1979). Assessment of suicidal intention: The Scale for Suicide Ideation. J Consult Clin Psychol, 47(2), 343–352. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.47.2.343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Brown, G. K., Steer, R. A., Dahlsgaard, K. K., & Grisham, J. R. (1999). Suicide ideation at its worst point: A predictor of eventual suicide in psychiatric outpatients. Suicide Life Threat Behav, 29(1), 1–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernert, R. A., Hom, M. A., & Roberts, L. W. (2014). A review of multidisciplinary clinical practice guidelines in suicide prevention: Toward an emerging standard in suicide risk assessment and management, training and practice. Acad Psychiatry, 38(5), 585–592. doi:10.1007/s40596–014–0180-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bevans, K. B., Diamond, G., & Levy, S. (2012). Screening for adolescents' internalizing symptoms in primary care: Item response theory analysis of the behavior health screen depression, anxiety, and suicidal risk scales. J Dev Behav Pediatr, 33(4), 283–290. doi:10.1097/DBP.0b013e31824eaa9a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Böhnke, J. R., & Croudace, T. J. (2015). Factors of psychological distress: Clinical value, measurement substance, and methodological artefacts. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, 50(4), 515–524. doi:10.1007/s00127–015–1022-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, C., Gooding, P., Kapur, N., Barrowclough, C., & Tarrier, N. (2007). Developing psychological perspectives of suicidal behaviour and risk in people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia: We know they kill themselves but do we understand why? Clin Psychol Rev, 27(4), 511–536. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2006.12.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011). Suicidal thoughts and behaviors among adults aged ≥18 years — United States, 2008–2009. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 60(13), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalker, S. A., Comtois, K. A., & Kerbrat, A. H. (2015). Impulsivity and suicidal behavior: How you define it matters. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 8(2), 172–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, E. N., Kaatz, A., & Carnes, M. (2013). Physicians and implicit bias: How doctors may unwittingly perpetuate health care disparities. J Gen Intern Med, 28(11), 1504–1510. doi:10.1007/s11606–013–2441-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coric, V., Stock, E. G., Pultz, J., Marcus, R., & Sheehan, D. V. (2009). Sheehan Suicidality Tracking Scale (Sheehan-STS): Preliminary results from a multicenter clinical trial in generalized anxiety disorder. Psychiatry, 6(1).

  • Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 173–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Beurs, D. P., De Vries, A. L. M., De Groot, M. H., De Keijser, J., & Kerkhof, A. J. F. M. (2014). Applying computer adaptive testing to optimize online assessment of suicidal behavior:a simulation study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(9). doi:10.2196/jmir.3511.

  • de Beurs, E., Barendregt, M., Rogmans, B., Robbers, S., van Geffen, M., van Aggelen-Gerrits, M., & Houben, H. (2015). Denoting treatment outcome in child and adolescent psychiatry: A comparison of continuous and categorical outcomes. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 24(5), 553–563. doi:10.1007/s00787–014–0609-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26, 3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Development Core Team, R. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.2.4). Viena, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing . Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dube, P., Kroenke, K., Bair, M. J., Theobald, D., & Williams, L. S. (2010). The P4 screener: Evaluation of a brief measure for assessing potential suicide risk in 2 randomized effectiveness trials of primary care and oncology patients. Primary Care Companion to the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 12(6). doi:10.4088/PCC.10m00978blu.

  • Farberow, N. L., & Shneidman, E. S. (Eds.) (1961). The cry for help. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedorov, V., Mannino, F., & Zhang, R. (2009). Consequences of dichotomization. Pharm Stat, 8(1), 50–61. doi:10.1002/pst.331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fortune, S., Stewart, A., Yadav, V., & Hawton, K. (2007). Suicide in adolescents: Using life charts to understand the suicidal process. J Affect Disord, 100(1–3), 199–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giner, L., Jaussent, I., Olie, E., Beziat, S., Guillaume, S., Baca-Garcia, E., et al. (2014). Violent and serious suicide attempters: One step closer to suicide? J Clin Psychiatry, 75(3), e191–e197. doi:10.4088/JCR13mO8524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gipson, P., & King, C. (2012). Health behavior theories and research: Implications for suicidal individuals' treatment linkage and adherence. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 19(2), 209–217. doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2010.11.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, J. F., Ernst, C. L., & Bird, S. (2007). Predicting hospitalization versus discharge of suicidal patients presenting to a psychiatric emergency service. Psychiatr Serv, 58(4), 561–565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Groth-Marnat, G. (2009). Handbook of psychological assessment (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, P. M., Freedenthal, S., Wong, J. L., Osman, A., & Norizuki, T. (2012). Validation of the suicide resilience inventory-25 (SRI-25) in adolescent psychiatric inpatient samples. J Pers Assess, 94(1), 53–61. doi:10.1080/00223891.2011.608755.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M. (1967). Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. The British journal of social and clinical psychology, 6(4), 278–296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. M., McLean, J. P., Sheffield, J., & Jobes, D. (2010). The internal suicide debate hypothesis: Exploring the life versus death struggle. Suicide Life Threat Behav, 40(2), 181–192. doi:10.1521/suli.2010.40.2.181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. M., McLean, J. P., & Sheffield, J. (2014). Suicidal and online: How do online behaviors inform us of this high-risk population? Death Studies, 38(6), 387–394. doi:10.1080/07481187.2013.768313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. M., Syu, J.-J., Lello, O. D., Chew, Y. L. E., Willcox, C. H., & Ho, R. C. M. (2015). The ABC’s of suicide risk assessment: Applying a tripartite approach to individual evaluations. PLoS One, 10(6), e0127442. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0127442 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127442

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Harriss, L., Hawton, K., & Zahl, D. (2005). Value of measuring suicidal intent in the assessment of people attending hospital following self-poisoning or self-injury. Br J Psychiatry, 186(1), 60–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hjelmeland, H., Stiles, T. C., Bille-Brahe, U., Ostamo, A., Renberg, E. S., & Wasserman, D. (1998). Parasuicide: The value of suicidal intent and various motives as predictors of future suicidal behaviour. Archives of Suicide Research, 4(3), 209–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, A. G., Czyz, E. K., & King, C. A. (2014). Predicting future suicide attempts among adolescent and emerging adult psychiatric emergency patients. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. doi:10.1080/15374416.2014.910789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innamorati, M., Pompili, M., Serafini, G., Lester, D., Erbuto, D., Amore, M., et al. (2011). Psychometric properties of the Suicidal History Self-rating Screening Scale. Archives of Suicide Research, 15(1), 87–92. doi:10.1080/13811118.2011.540471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jobes, D. A. (2006). Managing suicidal risk: A collaborative approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobes, D. A., Nelson, K. N., Peterson, E. M., Pentiuc, D., Downing, V., Francini, K., & Kiernan, A. (2004). Describing suicidality: An investigation of qualitative SSF responses. Suicide Life Threat Behav, 34(2), 99–112. doi:10.1521/suli.34.2.99.32788

  • Johnson, J., Gooding, P., & Tarrier, N. (2008). Suicide risk in schizophrenia: Explanatory models and clinical implications, The Schematic Appraisal Model of Suicide (SAMS). Psychol Psychother Theory Res Pract, 81(1), 55–77. doi:10.1348/147608307X244996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., & Üstün, T. B. (2004). The World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res, 13(2), 93–117. doi:10.1002/mpr.168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., Borges, G., & Walters, E. E. (1999). Prevalence of and risk factors for lifetime suicide attempts in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 56(7), 617–626.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • King, C. A., Eisenberg, D., Zheng, K., Czyz, E., Kramer, A., Horwitz, A., & Chermack, S. (2015). Online suicide risk screening and intervention with college students: A pilot randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol, 83(3), 630–636. doi:10.1037/a0038805.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Klonsky, E. D., & May, A. M. (2014). Differentiating suicide attempters from suicide ideators: A critical frontier for suicidology research. Suicide Life Threat Behav, 44(1), 1–5. doi:10.1111/sltb.12068.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs, M., & Beck, A. T. (1977). The wish to die and the wish to live in attempted suicides. J Clin Psychol, 33(2), 361–365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs, M., Beck, A. T., & Weissman, A. (1976). The communication of suicidal intent: A reexamination. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 33(2), 198–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kral, M. J., & Sakinofsky, I. (1994). Clinical model for suicide risk assessment. Death Studies, 18(4), 311–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumagai, R. (2012). A new method for estimating differential item functioning (DIF) for multiple groups and polytomous items: Development of index K and the computer program "EasyDIF". Japanese Journal of Psychology, 83(1), 35–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, C. T. S., Mohan, R., Ranjith, G., & Chandrasekaran, R. (2006). Characteristics of high intent suicide attempters admitted to a general hospital. J Affect Disord, 91(1), 77–81. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2005.12.028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Snarr, J. D., Slep, A. M. S., Heyman, R. E., & Foran, H. M. (2011). Risk for suicidal ideation in the U.S. Air Force: An ecological perspective. J Consult Clin Psychol, 79(5), 600–612. doi:10.1037/a0024631.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, D. V., Weiller, E., Amorim, P., Bonora, I., Sheehan, K. H., et al. (1997). The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: Reliability and validity according to the CIDI. Eur Psychol, 12(5), 224–231. doi:10.1016/S0924–9338(97)83296–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letizia, C., Kapik, B., & Flanders, W. D. (1996). Suicidal risk during controlled clinical investigations of fluvoxamine. J Clin Psychiatry, 57(9), 415–421.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychol Methods, 7(1), 19–40. doi:10.1037//1082-989X.7.1.19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markon, K. E., Chmielewski, M., & Miller, C. J. (2011). The reliability and validity of discrete and continuous measures of psychopathology: A quantitative review. Psychol Bull, 137(5), 856–879. doi:10.1037/a0023678.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle, M. J. (2015). AICcmodavg: Model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q)AIC(c) . Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=AICcmodavg.

  • McClain, C. S., Rosenfeld, B., & Breitbart, W. (2003). Effect of spiritual well-being on end-of-life despair in terminally-ill cancer patients. Lancet, 361(9369), 1603–1607. doi:10.1016/s0140–6736(03)13310–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, R. R., & Egberink, I. J. L. (2012). Investigating invariant item ordering in personality and clinical scales: Some empirical findings and a discussion. Educ Psychol Meas, 72(4), 589–607. doi:10.1177/0013164411429344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. K., Piscopo, K. D., Batts, K., Han, B., Colpe, L., Forman-Hoffman, V. L., et al. (2015). Measurement of suicidal thoughts, behaviors, and related health outcomes in the United States: Comparison of NSDUH estimates with other data sources. CBHSQ Data Review: SAMHSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misson, H., Mathieu, F., Jollant, F., Yon, L., Guillaume, S., Parmentier, C., et al. (2010). Factor analyses of the Suicidal Intent Scale (SIS) and the Risk-Rescue Rating Scale (RRRS): Toward the identification of homogeneous subgroups of suicidal behaviors. J Affect Disord, 121(1–2), 80–87. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2009.05.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Modai, I., Ritsner, M., Kurs, R., Mendel, S., & Ponizovsky, A. (2002). Validation of the Computerized Suicide Risk Scale - A backpropagation neural network instrument (CSRS-BP). Eur Psychol, 17(2), 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muraki, E. (1993). Information functions of the generalized partial credit model. Appl Psychol Meas, 17(4), 351–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nock, M. K., & Kessler, R. C. (2006). Prevalence of and risk factors for suicide attempts versus suicide gestures: Analysis of the National Comorbidity Survey. J Abnorm Psychol, 115(3), 616–623.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nock, M. K., Holmberg, E. B., Photos, V. I., & Michel, B. D. (2007). Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview: Development, reliability, and validity in an adolescent sample. Psychol Assess, 19(3), 309–317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nock, M. K., Borges, G., Bromet, E. J., Cha, C. B., Kessler, R. C., & Lee, S. (2008). Suicide and suicidal behavior. Epidemiol Rev, 30(1), 133–154. doi:10.1093/epirev/mxn002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olfson, M., Marcus, S. C., & Bridge, J. A. (2014). Focusing suicide prevention on periods of high risk. J Am Med Assoc, 311(11), 1107–1108. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osman, A., Bagge, C. L., Gutierrez, P. M., Konick, L. C., Kopper, B. A., & Barrios, F. X. (2001). The Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R): Validation with clinical and nonclinical samples. Assessment, 8(4), 443–454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osterlin, S. J., & Everson, H. T. (2009). Differential item functioning (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, W. M., Dohn, H. H., Bird, J., & Patterson, G. A. (1983). Evaluation of suicidal patients: The SAD PERSONS scale. Psychosomatics, 24(4), 343–345 348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, C. R., Conte, H. R., Plutchik, R., & Jerrett, I. (1979). Suicidal behavior in latency-age children. An empirical study. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 18(4), 679–692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plöderl, M., Kralovec, K., Yazdi, K., & Fartacek, R. (2011). A closer look at self-reported suicide attempts: False positives and false negatives. Suicide Life Threat Behav, 41(1), 1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, K., Brown, G. K., Stanley, B., Brent, D. A., Yershova, K. V., Oquendo, M. A., et al. (2011). The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: Initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. Am J Psychiatr, 168(12), 1266–1277. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111704.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Range, L. M. (2005). The family of instruments that assess suicide risk. J Psychopathol Behav Assess, 27(2), 133–140. doi:10.1007/s10862–005–5387-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Range, L. M., & Knott, E. C. (1997). Twenty suicide assessment instruments: Evaluation and recommendations. Death Studies, 21(1), 25–58. doi:10.1080/074811897202128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Revelle, W. (2016). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research (Version 1.6.3) [R package version 1.4.12]. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University . Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/psych/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizopoulos, D. (2006). ltm: An R package for latent variable modelling and item response theory analyses. J Stat Softw, 17(5), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J. R., Lewis, M. M., & Subich, L. M. (2002). Validity of the Suicide Assessment Checklist in an emergency crisis center. J Couns Dev, 80(4), 493–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, M. D. (2006). Fluid vulnerability theory: A cognitive approach to understanding the process of acute and chronic suicide risk. In T. E. Ellis (Ed.), Cognition and suicide: Theory, research, and therapy (pp. 355–368). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, M. D., Cukrowicz, K. C., & Bryan, C. J. (2008). Core competencies in suicide risk assessment and management: Implications for supervision. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 2(4), 219–228. doi:10.1037/1931–3918.2.4.219

  • Sapyta, J., Goldston, D. B., Erkanli, A., Daniel, S. S., Heilbron, N., Mayfield, A., & Lyn Treadway, S. (2012). Evaluating the predictive validity of suicidal intent and medical lethality in youth. J Consult Clin Psychol, 80(2), 222–231. doi:10.1037/a0026870.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, W. M., Allen, M. H., Feldman, B. N., Gutin, N. J., Jahn, D. R., Kleespies, P. M., et al. (2012). Preventing suicide through improved training in suicide risk assessment and care: An American Association of Suicidology task force report addressing serious gaps in U.S. mental health training. Suicide Life Threat Behav, 42(3), 292–304. doi:10.1111/j.1943-278X.2012.00090.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shneidman, E. S. (1996). The suicidal mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneidman, E. S. (2005). Anodyne psychotherapy for suicide: a psychological view of suicide. Clinical Neuropsychiatry: Journal of Treatment Evaluation, 2(1), 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, G. E., Savarino, J., Operskalski, B., & Wang, P. S. (2006). Suicide risk during antidepressent treatment. Am J Psychiatr, 163(1), 41–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychol Bull, 133(5), 859–883. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.133.5.859

  • Venta, A., & Sharp, C. (2014). Extending the concurrent validity of the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview to inpatient adolescents. J Psychopathol Behav Assess, 36(4), 675–682. doi:10.1007/s10862–013–9402-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viglione, D., Giromini, L., Gustafson, M. L., & Meyer, G. J. (2014). Developing continuous variable composites for Rorschach measures of thought problems, vigilance, and suicide risk. Assessment, 21(1), 42–49. doi:10.1177/1073191112446963.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagenmakers, E. J., & Farrell, S. (2004). AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychon Bull Rev, 11(1), 192–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2014). Preventing suicide: A global imperative. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No funding was received for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith M. Harris.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Keith M. Harris, Owen D. Lello and Christopher H. Willcox report no conflict of interest related to this study.

Experiment Participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all participants for the voluntary and anonymous surveys of the studies. All studies were approved by the appropriate institutional review board of the host institution.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 12 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harris, K.M., Lello, O.D. & Willcox, C.H. Reevaluating Suicidal Behaviors: Comparing Assessment Methods to Improve Risk Evaluations. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 39, 128–139 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-016-9566-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-016-9566-6

Keywords

Navigation