Psychometric Evaluation of the Factor Structure of the Teasing Questionnaire – Revised (TQ-R)

  • Daniel F. Gros
  • Kirstin Stauffacher Gros
  • Randi E. McCabe
  • Martin M. Antony
Article

Abstract

Recent literature has focused on the relation between childhood teasing and adulthood psychopathology, with the majority of this work dependent on a single measure, the Teasing Questionnaire-Revised (TQ-R; Storch et al. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 18:681–694, 2004). However, the factor structure and reliability of the TQ-R requires further examination. The present investigation reevaluated the factor structure of the TQ-R in two large samples. In Study 1, three previous factor models were investigated through confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) in a large clinical sample. Due to their poor fit, exploratory factor analyses (EFAs) were used to investigate alternative factor models. In Study 2, the factor structure of the previous models and new models from Study 1 EFAs were investigated through CFAs and estimates of internal consistency in a large college sample. Together, these findings provided the most support for a new 21-item five factor model, identified in the Study 1 EFAs and supported by the Study 2 CFAs, with the content of the teasing subscales consistent with the constructs of anxiety, appearance, academics, weight, and height.

Keywords

Teasing questionnaire-revised TQ-R Psychometrics Factor analyses Anxiety 

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed. text revision). Washington DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1995). EQS user’s guide. Encino: Multivariate Software.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  4. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Faith, M. A., Storch, E. A., Roberti, J. W., & Ledley, D. R. (2008). Recalled childhood teasing among non-clinical, non-college adults. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 30, 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1996). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders – Clinician version (SCID-I/P, Version 2.0). New York: New York Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research Department.Google Scholar
  7. Gros, D. F., Simms, L. J., & Antony, M. M. (2011). A hybrid model of social phobia: An analysis of social anxiety and related symptoms of anxiety. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67, 293–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gros, D. F., Simms, L. J., Antony, M. M., & McCabe, R. E. (2012). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Multidimensional Assessment of Social Anxiety (MASA). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68, 432–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kahn, J. H. (2006). Factor analysis in counseling psychology research, training, and practice: Principles, advances, and applications. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 684–718.Google Scholar
  12. McCabe, R. E., Antony, M. M., Summerfeldt, L. J., Liss, A., & Swinson, R. P. (2003). Preliminary examination of the relationship between anxiety disorders in adults and self reported history of teasing or bullying experiences. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 32, 187–193.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McCabe, R. E., Miller, J. L., Laugesen, N., Antony, M. M., & Young, L. (2010). The relationship between anxiety disorders in adults and recalled childhood teasing. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24, 238–243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Muris, P., & Little, M. (2005). Domains of childhood teasing and psychopathological symptoms in Dutch adolescents. Psychological Reports, 96, 707–708.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rapee, R. M., & Heimberg, R. G. (1997). A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 741–756.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Roth, D. A., Coles, M. E., & Heimberg, R. G. (2002). The relationship between memories for childhood teasing and anxiety and depression in adulthood. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 16, 149–164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variable analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Storch, E. A., & Ledley, D. R. (2005). Peer victimization and psychosocial adjustment in children: Current knowledge and future directions. Clinical Pediatrics, 44, 29–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Storch, E. A., Roth, D. A., Coles, M. E., Heimberg, R. G., Bravata, E. A., & Moser, J. (2004). The measurement and impact of childhood teasing in a sample of young adults. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 18, 681–694.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Strawser, M. A., Storch, E. A., & Roberti, J. W. (2005). The Teasing Questionnaire-Revised: Measurement of childhood teasing in adults. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 19, 780–792.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC (outside the USA) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel F. Gros
    • 1
    • 2
    • 6
  • Kirstin Stauffacher Gros
    • 2
    • 1
  • Randi E. McCabe
    • 3
    • 4
  • Martin M. Antony
    • 5
  1. 1.Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical CenterCharlestonUSA
  2. 2.Medical University of South CarolinaCharlestonUSA
  3. 3.Anxiety Treatment and Research Centre, St. Joseph’s HealthcareHamiltonCanada
  4. 4.McMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  5. 5.Ryerson UniversityTorontoCanada
  6. 6.CharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations