Abstract
Studies of PTSD employing symptom provocation have seldom included self-report measures of the symptoms provoked. Doing so could benefit psychobiological research by improving diagnostic discrimination and capturing the heterogeneity of responses to script-driven imagery, and treatment research by complementing existing outcome measures. This paper describes the initial development and psychometric properties of the Responses to Script-Driven Imagery Scale (RSDI), a brief self-report measure of state PTSD and dissociative symptoms evoked by script-driven imagery, a widely used symptom provocation method in PTSD research. Across three samples and three variants of the script-driven imagery paradigm, confirmatory factor analysis fit a hypothesized and sample-invariant three-factor structure for the RSDI, composed of reexperiencing, avoidance, and dissociative symptoms. Subscales exhibited acceptable to high internal consistency reliabilities, and construct validity evidence was strong and consistent with predictions. The RSDI shows promise as a tool for psychobiological and treatment outcome research on PTSD.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 893–897.
Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1987). Manual for the revised Beck Depression Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1993). Beck anxiety inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. E. (1996). Beck depression inventory (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Bernstein, E. M., & Putnam, F. W. (1986). Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 174, 727–735.
Blair, E., & Burton, S. (1987). Cognitive processes used by survey respondents to answer behavioral frequency questions. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 280–288.
Blake, D. D., Weathers, F. W., Nagy, L. M., Kaloupek, D. G., Gusman, F. D., Charney, D. S., et al. (1995). The development of a clinician-administered PTSD scale. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 8, 75–90.
Bremner, J. D., Krystal, J. H., Putnam, F. W., Southwick, S. M., Marmar, C., Charney, D. S., et al. (1998). Measurement of dissociative states with the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS). Journal of Traumatic Stress, 11, 125–136.
Bremner, J. D., Narayan, M., Staib, L. H., Southwick, S. M., McGlashan, T., & Charney, D. S. (1999). Neural correlates of memories of childhood sexual abuse in women with and without posttraumatic stress disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 1787–1795.
Briere, J. (2002). Multidimensional Dissociation Inventory (MDI). Odessa, Fl: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Briere, J., Weathers, F. W., & Runtz, M. (2005). Is dissociation a multidimensional construct? Evidence from the multiscale dissociation inventory. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 18, 221–231.
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, & programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carlson, E. B., & Putnam, F. W. (1993). An update on the Dissociative Experiences Scale. Dissociation, 6, 16–27.
Clark, D. A., Steer, R. A., & Beck, A. T. (1994). Common and specific dimensions of self-reported anxiety and depression: Implications for the cognitive and tripartite models. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 645–654.
Ellason, J. W., Ross, C. A., Mayran, L. W., & Sainton, K. (1994). Convergent validity of the new form of the DES. Dissociation, 7, 101–103.
First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1997). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID). New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research.
Foa, E. B. (1995). Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale (PDS) manual. Minneapolis, MN: NCS Pearson.
Foa, E. B., Cashman, L., Jaycox, L., & Perry, K. (1997). The validation of a self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder: The Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale. Psychological Assessment, 9, 445–451.
Foa, E. B., Riggs, D. S., Dancu, C. V., Rothbaum, B. O., & Olasov, B. (1993). Reliability and validity of a brief instrument for assessing posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 6, 459–473.
Freyberger, H. J., Spitzer, C., & Stieglitz, R.-D. (1999). Fragebogen zu Dissoziativen Symptomen. Bern, Germany: Hans Huber.
Friedman, W. J. (1993). Memory for the time of past events. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 44–66.
Frischholz, E. J., Braun, B. G., Sachs, R. G., Hopkins, L., Shaeffer, D. M., Lewis, J., et al. (1990). The Dissociative Experiences Scale: Further replication and validation. Dissociation, 3, 151–153.
Griffin, M. G., Resick, P. A., & Mechanic, M. B. (1997). Objective assessment of peritraumatic dissociation: Psychophysiological indicators. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 1081–1088.
Hewitt, P. L., & Norton, G. R. (1993). The Beck Anxiety Inventory: A psychometric analysis. Psychological Assessment, 5, 408–412.
Hiller, W., Zaudig, M., & Mombour, W. (1995). IDCL-Internationale Diagnosen Checklisten für ICD-10 und DSM-IV. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
Hopper, J. W., Frewen, P. A., van der Kolk, B. A., & Lanius, R. A. (2007). Dimensional analysis of responses to script-driven trauma imagery in PTSD: Neural correlates of re-experiencing, avoidance, and dissociation. Journal of Traumatic Stress (in press).
Hopper, J. W., & van der Kolk, B. A. (2001). Retrieving, assessing, and classifying traumatic memories: A preliminary report on three case studies of a new standardized method. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 4, 33–71.
Hütter, B. O., & Fischer, G. (1997). Clinimetric evaluation of the German version of the Impact of Event Scale. Presented at the 2nd European Conference on Traumatic Stress, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jaycox, L. H., Foa, E. B., & Morral, A. R. (1998). Influence of emotional engagement and habituation on exposure therapy for PTSD. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 185–192.
Keane, T. M., Kolb, L. C., Kaloupek, D. G., Orr, S. P., Blanchard, E. B., Thomas, R. G., et al. (1998). Utility of psychophysiological measurement in the diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder: Results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 914–923.
King, D. W., Leskin, G. A., King, L. A., & Weathers, F. W. (1998). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale: Evidence for the dimensionality of posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological Assessment, 10, 90–96.
Kruger, C., & Mace, C. J. (2002). Psychometric validation of the State Scale of Dissociation (SSD). Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 75, 33–35.
Lang, P. J., Levin, D. N., Miller, G. A., & Kozak, M. J. (1983). Fear behavior, fear imagery, and the psychophysiology of emotion: The problem of affective-response integration. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92, 276–306.
Lanius, R. A., Bluhm, R., Lanius, U., & Pain, C. (2006). A review of neuroimaging studies in PTSD: Heterogeneity of response to symptom provocation. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 40, 709–729.
Lanius, R. A., Williamson, P. C., Bluhm, R. L., Densmore, M., Boksman, K., Gupta, M., et al. (2005). Functional connectivity of dissociative responses in posttraumatic stress disorder: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation. Biological Psychiatry, 57, 873–884.
Lanius, R. A., Williamson, P. C., Boksman, K., Densmore, M., Gupta, M., Neufeld, R. W., et al. (2002). Brain activation during script-driven imagery induced dissociative responses in PTSD: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 305–311.
Lanius, R. A., Williamson, P. C., Densmore, M., Boksman, K., Gupta, M., Neufeld, R. W., et al. (2001). Neural correlates of traumatic memories in posttraumatic stress disorder: A functional MRI investigation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1920–1922.
MacCallum, R. C., Widamon, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99.
Marmar, C. R., Weiss, D. S., & Metzler, T. J. (1997). The peritraumatic dissociative experiences questionnaire. In J. P. Wilson & T. M. Keane (Eds.), Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD (pp. 412–428). New York: Guilford.
Marmar, C. R., Weiss, D. S., Schlenger, W. E., Fairbank, J. A., Jordan, B. K., Kulka, R. A., et al. (1994). Peritraumatic dissociation and posttraumatic stress in male Vietnam theatre veterans. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 902–907.
Meade, A. W., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (2004). A Monte-Carlo study of confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement equivalence/invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 60–72.
Nixon, R. D. V., Bryant, R. A., Moulds, M. L., Felmingham, K. L., & Mastrodomenico, J. A. (2005). Physiological arousal and dissociation in acute trauma victims during trauma narratives. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 18, 107–113.
Orr, S. P., & Kaloupek, D. G. (1997). Psychophysiological assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder. In J. P. Wilson & T. M. Keane (Eds.), Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD (pp. 69–97). New York: Guilford.
Orr, S. P., Pitman, R. K., Lasko, N. B., & Herz, L. R. (1993). Psychophysiological assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder imagery in World War II and Korean combat veterans. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 152–159.
Orr, S. P., & Roth, W. T. (2000). Psychophysiological assessment: Clinical applications for PTSD. Journal of Affective Disorders, 61, 225–240.
Pitman, R. K. (1997). Overview of biological themes in PTSD. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 821, 1–9.
Pitman, R. K., Orr, S. P., Forgue, D. F., de Jong, J. B., & Claiborn, J. M. (1987). Psychophysiologic assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder imagery in Vietnam combat veterans. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 970–975.
Schmahl, C. G., Elzinga, B. M., & Bremner, J. D. (2002). Individual differences in psychophysiological reactivity in adults with childhood abuse. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 9, 271–276.
Shalev, A. Y., Orr, S. P., & Pitman, R. K. (1992). Psychophysiologic response during script-driven imagery as an outcome measure in posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 53, 324–326.
Southwick, S. M., Krystal, J. H., Morgan, C. A., Johnson, D., Nagy, L. M., Nicolaou, A., et al. (1993). Abnormal noradrenergic function in posttraumatic stress disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 266–274.
Steer, R. A., Ranieri, W. F., Beck, A. T., & Clark, D. A. (1993). Further evidence for the validity of the Beck Anxiety Inventory with psychiatric outpatients. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 7, 195–205.
Steinberg, M. (1994). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Dissociative Disorders (SCID-D) (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric.
Sudman, S., Bradburn, N. M., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Thinking about answers: The applications of cognitive processes to survey methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Weathers, F. W., Keane, T. M., & Davidson, J. R. (2001). Psychometric properties of nine scoring rules for the Clinician-Administered Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Scale. Psychological Assessment, 11, 124–133.
Weathers, F. W., Ruscio, A. M., & Keane, T. M. (1999). Psychometric properties of nine scoring rules for the Clinician-Administered Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Scale. Psychological Assessment, 11, 124–133.
Weiss, D., & Marmar, C. (1997). The impact of event scale–revised. In J. Wilson & T. Keane (Eds.), Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD. New York: Guilford.
World Health Organization (1992). The international classification of diseases of mental and behavioral disorders (10th ed.). Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines (ICD-10). Geneva: World Health Organization.
Acknowledgment
This research was supported by National Institute of Mental Health Grant MH-58363, a grant from Pfizer Incorporated for an investigator-initiated proposal, and Canadian Institutes of Health Research Grant MOP 49543.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Responses to Script-Driven Imagery Scale
Notes on Administration
This scale can be administered as an interview or a questionnaire, and can be used immediately after the entire script-driven imagery protocol (e.g., before removing electrodes, etc.), or immediately after the post-imaging rest period for each script. For the interview version, print the Likert scale on a separate page and give it to the subject at that point in the directions.
Directions for Participant
“You will be asked to describe the extent to which you have had particular experiences, during the script and the imagining periods between the script and the rest period.”
“You will be asked to give ratings on this scale:
“If you have difficulty remembering and/or estimating the extent of your experience for a particular item, just make the best estimation you can of your experience based on your memory now.”
1. Did you feel as though the event was reoccurring, like you were reliving it?
2. Were you distressed?
3. Were you emotionally upset?
4. Did you have physical reactions in your body (for example, sweaty, racing heart, trembling, short of breath)?
5. Did you avoid experiencing images, sounds, or smells connected to the event?
6. Did you avoid thoughts about the event?
7. Did you avoid feelings about the event?
8. Did what you were experiencing seem unreal to you, like you were in a dream or watching a movie or play?
9. Did you feel like you were a spectator watching what was happening to you, like an observer or outsider?
10. Did you feel disconnected from your body?
11. Did you feel like you were in a fog?
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hopper, J.W., Frewen, P.A., Sack, M. et al. The Responses to Script-Driven Imagery Scale (RSDI): Assessment of State Posttraumatic Symptoms for Psychobiological and Treatment Research. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 29, 249–268 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-007-9046-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-007-9046-0