College-aged adults represent the largest age group reporting current use of cigarettes. One factor that may account for these elevated smoking rates is tobacco advertisements targeting this population. Given the detrimental influence of smoking advertisements, it is essential to focus on counter measures. A unique and promising approach that may prove useful in preventing individuals from engaging in smoking behavior is to examine the manner in which individuals view smoking as well as how they view themselves. This study presents preliminary data on the use of Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count analysis to examine differences in language use among 48 college-aged smokers and never smokers when writing about the way they view themselves with regard to the dangers of smoking. Results revealed significant differences across a number of linguistic domains, indicating that the use of language may have implications for public health messages designed to prevent the onset of smoking, as well as those messages that target smoking cessation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altman, D. G., Levine, D. W., Coeytaux, R., Slade, J., & Jaffe, R. (1996). Tobacco promotion and susceptibility to tobacco use among adolescents aged 12 through 17 years in a nationally representative sample. American Journal of Public Health, 86(11), 1590–1593.
American Lung Association. (2000, September). American Lung Association Fact Sheet Smoking. Retrieved January 22, 2002, from http://www.lungusa.org/tobacco/smoking_factsheet99.html
Banks, S. M., Salovey, P., Greener, S., Rothman, A. J., Moyer, A., Beauvais, J., et al. (1995). The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. Health Psychology, 14(2), 178–184.
Botvin, G. J., Goldberg, C. J., Botvin, E. M., & Dusenbury, L. (1993). Smoking behavior of adolescents exposed to cigarette advertising. Public Health Reports: Journal of the United States Public Health Service, 108(2), 217–224.
Cohen, L. M., McCarthy, D. M., Brown, S. A., & Myers, M. G. (2002). Negative affect combines with smoking outcome expectancies to predict smoking behavior over time. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16(2), 91–97.
Detweiler, J. B., Bedell, B. T., Salovey, P., Pronin, E., & Rothman, A. J. (1999). Message framing and sunscreen use: Gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers. Health Psychology, 18(2), 189–196.
Gilpin, E. A., Pierce, J. P., & Rosbrook, B. (1997). Are adolescents receptive to current sales promotion practices of the tobacco industry? Preventive Medicine, 26, 14–21.
Hall, S. M., Muñoz, R. F., Reus, V. I., & Sees, K. I. (1993). Nicotine, negative affect, and depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 761–767.
Krugman, D. M., Fox, R. J., & Fischer, P. M. (1999). Do cigarette warnings warn? Understanding what it will take to develop more effective warnings. Journal of Health Communication, 4(2), 95–105.
National Cancer Institute. (2001, November). Changing adolescent smoking prevalence (NIH Publication No. 02-5068). Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No. 14. Bethseda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute.
Pennebaker, J. W. (1990). Opening up: The healing power of expressing emotions. New York: Guilford Press.
Pennebaker, J. W. (2002). What our words can say about us: Toward a broader language psychology. Psychological Science Agenda, 15, 8–9.
Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count:LIWC2001. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 3–19.
Rothman, A. J., Salovey, P., Antone, C., Keough, K., & Martin, C. D. (1993). The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 408–433.
Rude, S. S., Gortner, E. V., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2002, June). Language use of depressed and depression-vulnerable college students. Paper presented at American Psychological Society, New Orleans.
Schneider, T. R., Salovey, P., Pallonen, U., Mundorf, N., Smith, N. F., & Steward, W. T. (2001). Visual and auditory message framing effects on tobacco smoking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(4), 667–682.
Smith, S. M., & Petty, R. E. (1996). Message framing and persuasion: A message processing analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(3), 257–268.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2002). National Survey on Drug Use & Health. Retrieved November 7, 2003, from http://www.samhsa.gov/oas/NHSDA/2k2NSDUH/ Results/2k2results.htm#chap4
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alexander-Emery, S., Cohen, L.M. & Prensky, E.H. Linguistic Analysis of College Aged Smokers and Never Smokers. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 27, 11–16 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-005-3260-4
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-005-3260-4