Skip to main content
Log in

Efficient assignment of methyl resonances: Enhanced sensitivity by gradient selection in a DE-MQ–(H)CCmHt m–TOCSY experiment

  • Published:
Journal of Biomolecular NMR Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a gradient selected and doubly sensitivity-enhanced DE-MQ–(H)CCmHm–TOCSY experiment for the sequence-specific assignment of methyl resonances in 13C,15N labeled proteins. The proposed experiment provides improved sensitivity and artifact suppression relative to the phase-cycled experiments. One part of the 13Cchemical shift evolution takes place under heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence, whereas the other part occurs under 13C single quantum coherence in a semi-constant time fashion. The feasibility of the experiment was assessed using 15N,13C labeled Mus musculus coactosin (16 kDa), having a rotational correlation time of 14.5 ns at 15 °C in D2O. A 16-h experiment on 600 MHz 1H yielded good quality data and enabled the assignment of 70 out of 72 methyl groups in coactosin. As well as being an improved approach for methyl resonance assignment, this experiment can also be highly valuable for the rapid assignment of methyl resonances in SAR by NMR studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • H. Aitio P. Permi (2000) J. Magn. Reson. 143 391–396

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Bax M. Ikura (1991) J. Biomol. NMR 1 99–104

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Bax M. Clore P.C. Driscoll A.M. Gronenborn M. Ikura L.E. Kay (1990a) J. Magn. Reson. 87 620–627

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Bax M. Clore A. M. Gronenborn (1990b) J. Magn. Reson. 88 425–431

    Google Scholar 

  • S.W. Fesik H.L. Eaton E.T. Olejniczak E.R.P. Zuiderweg (1990) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112 886–888

    Google Scholar 

  • K.H. Gardner R. Konrat M.K. Rosen L.E. Kay (1996) J. Biomol. NMR 8 351–356

    Google Scholar 

  • K.H. Gardner X. Zhang K. Gehring L.E. Kay (1997a) J. Am. Chem. Soc 120 11738–11758

    Google Scholar 

  • K.H. Gardner M.K. Rosen L.E. Kay (1997b) Biochemistry 36 1389–1401

    Google Scholar 

  • N.K. Goto K.H. Gardner G.A. Muueller R.C. Willis L.E. Kay (1999) J. Biomol. NMR 13 369–374

    Google Scholar 

  • S Grzesiek A. Bax (1992a) J. Magn. Reson. 99 201–207

    Google Scholar 

  • S Grzesiek A. Bax (1992b) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 6291–6293

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Grzesiek A. Bax (1993) J. Biomol. NMR 3 185–204

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Grzesiek J. Anglister A. Bax (1993) J. Magn. Reson. 101 114–119

    Google Scholar 

  • P.J. Hajduk D.J. Augeri J. Mack R. Mendoza J. Yang S. F. Betz S.W. Fesik (2000) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 7898–7904

    Google Scholar 

  • P.J. Hajduk R.P. Meadows S.W. Fesik (1997) Science 278 497–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, M., Paavilainen, V.O., Annila, A., Lappalainen, P. and Permi, P. J. Biomol. NMR, 30, 365–366.

  • C. Hilty C. Fernandez G. Wider K. Wüthrich (2002) J. Biomol. NMR 23 289–301

    Google Scholar 

  • L.E. Kay M. Ikura R. Tschudin A. Bax (1990a) J. Magn. Reson. 89 496–514

    Google Scholar 

  • L.E. Kay M. Ikura A. Bax (1990b) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112 888–889

    Google Scholar 

  • L.E. Kay P. Keifer T. Saarinen (1992) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 10663–10665

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Kövér D. Uhrín V. Hruby (1998) J. Magn. Reson. 130 162–168

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Kupce G. Wagner (1995) J. Magn. Reson. 109A 329–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Liu G. Wagner (1999) J. Biomol. NMR 15 227–239

    Google Scholar 

  • T.M. Logan E.T. Olejniczak R.X. Xu S.W. Fesik (1993) J. Biomol. NMR 3 225–231

    Google Scholar 

  • B.A. Lyons G.T. Montelione (1993) J. Magn. Reson. 101 206–209

    Google Scholar 

  • M.A. McCoy L. Mueller (1992) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 2108–2112

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Mohebbi A.J. Shaka (1991) Chem. Phys. Lett. 178 374–377

    Google Scholar 

  • G.T. Montelione B.A. Lyons S.D. Emerson M. Tashiro (1992) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 10974–10975

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Permi (2002) J. Biomol. NMR 23 201–209

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Permi A. Annila (2004) Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectra 44 97–137

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Sattler M.G. Schwendinger J. Schleucher C. Griesinger (1995a) J. Biomol. NMR 5 11–22

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Sattler P. Schmidt J. Schleucher O. Schedletzky S.J. Glaser C. Griesinger (1995b) J. Magn. Reson. 108 B 235–242

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Sattler J. Schleucher C. Griesinger (1999) Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectra 34 93–158

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Schleucher M. Sattler C. Griesinger (1993) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 32 1489–1491

    Google Scholar 

  • A.J. Shaka J. Keeler T. Frenkiel R. Freeman (1983) J. Magn. Reson. 52 335–338

    Google Scholar 

  • A.J. Shaka C.J. Lee A. Pines (1988) J. Magn. Reson. 77 274–293

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Tugarinov L.E. Kay (2003a) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 5701–5706

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Tugarinov L.E. Kay (2003b) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 13868–13878

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhrín, D., Uhrínová, S., Leadbeater, C., Nairn, J., Price, N. and Barlow, P. (2000) J. Magn. Reson., 288–293.

  • T. Untidt T. Schulte-Herbrüggen B. Luy S.J. Glaser C. Griesinger O.W. Sørensen N.C. Nielsen (1998) Mol. Phys. 95 787–796

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Wittekind L. Mueller (1992) J. Magn. Res. 101B 201–205

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Yamazaki W. Lee M. Revington D.L. Mattiello F.W. Dahlquist C.H. Arrowsmith L.E. Kay (1994) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116 6464–6465

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Yang Y. Zheng D. Liu D.F. Wyss (2004) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 3710–3711

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Perttu Permi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Permi, P., Tossavainen, H. & Hellman, M. Efficient assignment of methyl resonances: Enhanced sensitivity by gradient selection in a DE-MQ–(H)CCmHt m–TOCSY experiment. J Biomol NMR 30, 275–282 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-004-3222-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-004-3222-2

Keywords

Navigation