Enhancing teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) is essential to improving the teaching and learning of mathematics. Mathematics teacher educators (MTEs) need to help prospective teachers enhance PCK (Marks in J Teach Educ 41(3):3–11, 1990. doi:10.1177/002248719004100302; Mason 2008). However, we know very little about the practices of MTEs, especially in mathematics content courses, as these practices are not widely researched or disseminated (e.g., Bergsten and Grevholm, in: Jaworski, Wood (eds) The international handbook of mathematics teacher education, vol 4, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, pp 223–246, 2008; Floden and Philipp, in: Lester, Ferrini-Mundy (eds) Proceedings of the NCTM research catalyst conference, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, pp 171–176, 2003). This phenomenographical study offers empirical findings on commonly identified purposes across ten expert MTEs who provided K-8 prospective teachers with opportunities to develop PCK in their mathematics content courses. Furthermore, our emergent findings indicated that expert MTEs also provided opportunities for prospective teachers to develop orientations toward teaching the subject, which prompted framework adaptations and articulations of “orientations” as a construct discussed in the broader literature outside of mathematics teacher education research (Magnusson et al., in: Gess-Newsome, Lederman (eds) Examining pedagogical content knowledge, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 95–132, 1999). Research and practitioner implications from this study provide specific PCK-related learning opportunities of prospective teachers through the lenses of expert MTEs’ (personal and professional) purposes and reflections on teaching, as a foundation on which the field can continue building future research and MTEs can continue building their practice in mathematics content courses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Akerlind, G. (2005). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(4), 321–334.
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–272.
An, S., Kulm, G., & Wu, Z. (2004). The pedagogical content knowledge of middle school, mathematics teachers in China and the U.S. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(2), 145–172.
Anderson, C. W., & Smith, E. L. (1985). Teaching science. In J. Koehler (Ed.), The educator’s handbook: A research perspective (pp. 84–111). New York: Longman.
Australian Curriculum and Assessment Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2014). Foundation to year 10 curriculum: Mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/mathematics/aims.
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practices, developing practitioners. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ball, D. L., Sleep, L., Boerst, T. A., & Bass, H. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 458–474.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
Bass, H. (2005). Mathematics, mathematicians, and mathematics education. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 42(4), 417–430.
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., et al. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 133–180.
Bergsten, C., & Grevholm, B. (2008). Knowledgeable teacher educators and linking practices. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 4, pp. 223–246). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Blömeke, S., Buchholtz, N., Suhl, U., & Kaiser, G. (2014). Resolving the chicken-or-egg causality dilemma: The longitudinal interplay of teacher knowledge and teacher beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 130–139.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality & Quantity, 36(4), 391–409.
Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673–708). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Bowden, J. A., & Walsh, E. (2000). Phenomenography. Melbourne: RMIT University.
Boyd, D., Grossman, P. L., Hammerness, K., Lankford, R. H., Loeb, S., McDonald, M., et al. (2008). Surveying the landscape of teacher education in New York City: Constrained variation and the challenge of innovation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(4), 319–343.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn (expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Burton, M., Daane, C. J., & Giessen, J. (2008). Infusing mathematics content into a methods course: Impacting content knowledge for teaching. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 1, 1–12.
Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., Parker, D., Kulm, G., & Raulerson, T. (2005). The mathematics content knowledge role in developing preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 20, 108–124.
Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., & Carey, D. A. (1988). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of student’s problem solving in elementary arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 385–401.
Chapin, S. H., O’Connor, C., & Anderson, N. C. (2009). Classroom discussions: Using math talk to help students learn, Grades K-6. Sausalito: Math Solutions.
Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263–272.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM). Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers.
Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences. (2001). The mathematical education of teachers (Issues in mathematics education, Vol. 11). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences. (2012). The mathematical education of teachers II (Issues in mathematics education, Vol. 17). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Reforming teacher preparation and licensing: Debating the evidence. Teachers College Record, 102(1), 28–56.
Darling-Hammond, L., Macdonald, M. B., Snyder, J., Whitford, B. L., Rusco, G., & Fickel, L. (2000). Studies of excellence in teacher education: Preparation at the graduate level. New York, NY: AACTE Publications.
Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. Handbook of Research on Teaching, 3, 392–431.
Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking. A study of practical knowledge. Croom Helm curriculum policy and research series. New York, NY: Nichols Publishing Company.
European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education. (2011). Teacher education for inclusion across Europe: A synthesis of policy and practice in 25 countries. Østre: Author.
Even, R. (2008). Facing the challenge of educating educators to work with practicing mathematics teachers. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 4, pp. 57–73). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Feimen-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.
Floden, R. E., & Philipp, R. A. (2003). Report of working group 7: Teacher preparation. In F. K. Lester & J. Ferrini-Mundy (Eds.), Proceedings of the NCTM research catalyst conference (pp. 171–176). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 813–828.
Friedrichsen, P. J., Abell, S. K., Pareja, E. M., Brown, P. L., Lankford, D. M., & Volkmann, M. J. (2009). Does teaching experience matter? Examining biology teachers’ prior knowledge for teaching in an alternative certification program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(4), 357–383.
Ghousseini, H., & Herbst, P. (2016). Pedagogies of practice and opportunities to learn about classroom mathematics discussions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(1), 79–103.
Goldrick-Rab, S. (2007). Promoting academic momentum at community colleges: Challenges and opportunities. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center.
Goodell, J. (2006). Using critical incident reflections: a self-study as a mathematics teacher educator. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(3), 221–248.
Greenberg, J., & Walsh, K. (2008). No common denominator: The preparation of elementary teachers in mathematics by America’s education schools. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality.
Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, 15(2), 273–289.
Grossman, P. L., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184–205.
Grubb, N. W., & Associates. (1999). Honored but invisible: An inside look at teaching in community colleges. New York: Routledge.
Hallett, D., Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2010). Individual differences in conceptual and procedural knowledge when learning fractions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 395–406.
Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (2013). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1–28). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Hiebert, J., & Morris, A. K. (2009). Building a knowledge base for teacher education: An experience in K-8 mathematics teacher preparation. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 475–490.
Hiebert, J., Morris, A. K., & Glass, B. (2003). Learning to learn to teach: An “experiment’’ model for teaching and teacher preparation in mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(3), 201–222.
Hill, H. C., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California’s mathematics professional development institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 330–351.
Hill, H., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.
Hill, H., & Grossman, P. (2013). Learning from teacher evaluations: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 371–384). Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
Hill, H. C., Sleep, L., Lewis, J. M., & Ball, D. L. (2007). Assessing teachers’ mathematical knowledge: What knowledge matters and what evidence counts. Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 1, 111–155.
Hodgson, B. (2001). The mathematical education of school teachers: Role and responsibilities of university mathematicians. In D. Holton (Ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level (pp. 501–518). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Jaworski, B. (2008). Mathematics teacher educator learning and development: An introduction. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 4, pp. 1–13). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Kaur, B., Kwon, O., & Leong, Y. (2017). Professional development of mathematics teachers. Mathematics education—An Asian perspective. Singapore: Springer.
Kazemi, E., Lampert, M., & Franke, M. (2009). Developing pedagogies in teacher education to support novice teacher’s ability to enact ambitious instruction. In R. Hunter, B. Bicknell, & T. Burgess (Eds.), Crossing divides: Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 12–30). Palmerston North, NZ: MERGA.
Levine, A. (2006). Educating school teachers. New York: The Education Schools Project.
Lutzer, D. J., Rodi, S. B., Kirkman, E. E., & Maxwell, J. W. (2007). Statistical abstract of undergraduate programs in the mathematical sciences in the United States. Washington, DC: American Mathematical Society.
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 3–11. doi:10.1177/002248719004100302.
Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography—Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200.
Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenograpy: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. A. (1997). Learning and awareness. Hove: Psychology Press.
Masingila, J. O., Olanoff, D. E., & Kwaka, D. K. (2012). Who teaches mathematics content courses for prospective elementary teachers in the United States? Results of a national survey. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(5), 347–358.
Mason, J. (2008). PCK and beyond. In P. Sullivan & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 1, pp. 301–322). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
McDuffie, A. R., Drake, C., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A. (2008). The elementary mathematics methods course. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 4, pp. 247–264). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Moss, P. A. (2011). Analyzing the teaching of professional practice. Teachers College Record, 113(12), 2878–2896.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.
National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
OECD. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: OECD Publications.
OECD. (2010). Educating teachers for diversity: Meeting the challenge. Paris: OECD Publications.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Porter, E. J., & Cohen, M. Z. (2013). Phenomenology. In A. A. Trainor & E. Graue (Eds.), Reviewing qualitative research in the social sciences (pp. 180–196). New York, NY: Routledge.
Sherin, M. G. (2001). Developing a professional vision of classroom events. In T. Wood, B. S. Nelson, & J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy: Teaching elementary school mathematics (pp. 75–93). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–21.
Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1995). A prototype view of expert teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(6), 9–17.
Stigler, J. W., Givvin, K. B., & Thompson, B. J. (2010). What community college developmental mathematics students understand about mathematics. MathAMATYC Educator, 1(3), 4–16.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 17, 273–285.
Superfine, A. C., & Li, W. (2014). Exploring the mathematical knowledge needed for teaching teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 303–314.
Sztajn, P., Ball, D. L., & McMahon, T. A. (2006). Designing learning opportunities for mathematics teacher developers. In K. Lynch-Davis & R. L. Rider (Eds.), The work of mathematics teacher educators: Continuing the conversation, AMTE monograph (Vol. 3, pp. 149–162). San Diego, CA: Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.
Taylor, C. E. (2013). Facilitating prospective teachers’ knowledge of student understanding: The case of one mathematics teacher educator. In A. M. Lindmeier & A. Heinze (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 273–280). Kiel: PME.
Taylor, P. M., & Ronau, R. (2006). Syllabus study: A structured look at mathematics methods courses. AMTE Connections, 16(1), 12–15.
Thanheiser, E., Browning, C., Edson, A. J., Lo, J. J., Whitacre, I., Olanoff, D., et al. (2014). Mathematical content knowledge for teaching elementary mathematics: What do we know, what do we not know, and where do we go? The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(2), 433–448.
Thompson, A. G., Philipp, R. A., Thompson, P. W., & Boyd, B. A. (1994). Calculational and conceptual orientations in teaching mathematics. In A. Coxford (Ed.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics. Yearbook of the NCTM (pp. 79–92). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Tirosh, D., Tsamir, P., Levenson, E., & Tabach, M. (2011). From preschool teachers’ professional development to children’s knowledge: Comparing sets. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 113–131.
Tzur, R. (2001). Becoming a mathematics teacher-educator: Conceptualizing the terrain through self-reflective analysis. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(4), 259–283.
Vale, C. (2010). Supporting “out-of-field” teachers of secondary mathematics. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 66(1), 17–24.
Van Hiele, P. M. (1999). Developing geometric thinking through activities that begin with play. Teaching Children Mathematics, 5(6), 310.
Van Zoest, L. R., Moore, D. L., & Stockero, S. L. (2006). Transition to teacher educator: A collaborative effort. In K. Lynch-Davis & R. L. Rider (Eds.), AMTE monograph, Vol. 3: The work of mathematics teacher educators (pp. 133–148). San Diego: Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878–903.
Wolters, C. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms. Instructional Science, 26(1–2), 27–47.
Zaslavsky, O. (2007). Mathematics-related tasks, teacher education, and teacher educators. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4), 433–440.
Zaslavsky, O. (2009). Mathematics educators’ knowledge and development. In R. Even & D. L. Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics (pp. 105–111). Berlin: Springer.
About this article
Cite this article
Appova, A., Taylor, C.E. Expert mathematics teacher educators’ purposes and practices for providing prospective teachers with opportunities to develop pedagogical content knowledge in content courses. J Math Teacher Educ 22, 179–204 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-017-9385-z
- Mathematics teacher educator
- Prospective teacher
- Mathematics content course
- Pedagogical content knowledge
- Course purposes