# Variations in coaching knowledge and practice that explain elementary and middle school mathematics teacher change

## Abstract

This study investigated relationships between changes in certain types of coaching knowledge and practices among mathematics classroom coaches and how these explain changes in the attitudes, knowledge, and practice of the teachers they coach. Participants in this study were 51 school-based mathematics classroom coaches in the USA and 180 of the teachers whom they coached between 2009 and 2014. The participating coaches were recruited from schools that hired their own coaches independently from this research project. This study found evidence that improvements in coaches’ use of practices recommended by particular coaching models are related to improvements in teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching. The study also found that improvements in coaches’ self-assessment of their own coaching skills are related to improvements in teachers’ mathematics content knowledge for teaching, mathematics teaching practices, and attitudes about self-efficacy for teaching mathematics. The study did not detect relationships between changes in coaches’ mathematics knowledge and changes in teachers’ knowledge or practices.

## Keywords

Classroom coaching Professional development Mathematics education Mentoring Teacher knowledge Teacher practice## Notes

### Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant 0918326. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

## References

- Agresti, A. (2010).
*Analysis of ordinal categorical data*(2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ball, D. L. (2012). Tackling inequity by teaching to teach: Focusing on high leverage strategies. Presentation at Fall 2012 CAEP conference, Arlington, VA. Downloaded at http://www-personal.umich.edu/~dball/presentations/091312_CAEP.pdf.
- Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?
*Journal of Teacher Education,**59*(5), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 (R package version 1.1-6). Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html.
- Biancarosa, G., & Bryk, A. S. (2011). Efficacy of literacy collaborative professional development: A summary of findings.
*Journal of Reading Recovery,**10,*25–32.Google Scholar - Bickel, R. (2007).
*Multilevel analysis for applied research: It’s just regression!*. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar - Campbell, P. F., & Malkus, N. N. (2011). The impact of elementary mathematics coaches on student achievement.
*Elementary School Journal,**111*(3), 430–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Campbell, P. F., Nishio, M., Smith, T. M., Clark, L. M., Conant, D. L., Rust, A. H., et al. (2014). The relationship between teachers’ mathematical content and pedagogical knowledge, teachers’ perceptions, and student achievement.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,**45*(4), 419–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Christensen, R. H. B. (2012). ordinal: Regression models for ordinal data (R package version 2012.01-19). Retrieved from http://www.cran.r-project.org/package=ordinal/.
- Core Team, R. (2016).
*R: A language and environment for statistical computing*. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar - Costa, A. L., & Garmston, R. J. (2002).
*Cognitive coaching: A foundation for renaissance schools*. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.Google Scholar - Dweck, Carol. (2006).
*Mindsets: The new psychology of success*. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar - Gelman, A. (2008). Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations.
*Statistics in Medicine,**27*(15), 2865–2873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Greenwood, M., & Jesse, D. (2014). Scoring and then analyzing or analyzing while scoring: An application of GLMM to an education instrument development and analysis. In J. S. M. Proceedings (Ed.),
*Statistical computing section*. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.Google Scholar - Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., et al. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study.
*Cognition and Instruction,**26*(4), 430–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement.
*American Educational Research Journal,**42*(2), 371–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching.
*The Elementary School Journal,**105*(1), 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Horizon Research Inc. (2000). Validity and reliability information for the LSC Classroom Observation Protocol. Retrieved from http://www.horizon-research.com/LSC/news/cop_validity_2000.pdf.
- Hull, T. H., Balka, D. S., & Miles, R. H. (2009).
*A guide to mathematics coaching: Processes for increasing student achievement*. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar - Knight, J. (2007).
*Instructional coaching: A partnership approach to improving instruction*. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar - Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014).
*Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook*(3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar - Neuman, S. B., & Wright, T. S. (2010). Promoting language and literacy development for early childhood educators: A mixed-methods study of coursework and coaching.
*The Elementary School Journal,**111*(1), 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000).
*Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus*. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Powell, D. R., & Diamond, K. E. (2011). Improving the outcomes of coaching-based professional development interventions. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.),
*Handbook of early literacy research*(Vol. 3, pp. 295–307). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar - Ramey, S. L., Crowell, N. A., Ramey, C. T., Grace, C., Timraz, N., & Davis, L. E. (2011). The dosage of professional development for early childhood professionals: How the amount and density of professional development may influence its effectiveness. In J. A. Sutterby (Ed.),
*The early childhood educator professional development grant: Research and practice*(pp. 11–32). Cambridge, MA: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Revelle, W. (2014). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research (R package version 1.4.8). Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/package=psych.
- Rizopoulos, D. (2006). ltm: An R package for latent variable modeling and item response theory analyses.
*Journal of Statistical Software,**17*(5), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003).
*Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence*. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sutton, J. T., Burroughs, E. A., & Yopp, D. A. (2011). Mathematics coaching knowledge: Domains and definitions.
*Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership,**13*(2), 12–20.Google Scholar - U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (2012).
*Common core of data (CCD)*[Data file]. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/districtsearch/. - Weiss, I. R., Pasley, J. D., Smith, P. S., Banilower, E. R., & Heck, D. J. (2003).
*Looking inside the classroom: A study of K*–*12 mathematics and science education in the United States*. Retrieved from the Horizon Research Inc. http://www.horizon-research.com/insidetheclassroom/reports/looking/complete.pdf. - West, L., & Staub, F. C. (2003).
*Content-focused coaching: Transforming mathematics lessons*. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar