Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 49–74 | Cite as

Mathematics education as sociopolitical: prospective teachers’ views of the What, Who, and How

Article

Abstract

In this article, I introduce a framework—the What, Who, and How of mathematics—that emerged from studying my teaching of prospective teachers and their views of the social and political dimensions of mathematics teaching and learning. The What, Who, How framework asks us to consider What messages we send about mathematics and the world, Whose perspectives are represented in mathematics, and How mathematical concepts and our world are related. I situate each aspect of the framework in the literature on social justice and critical mathematics and provide examples of prospective teachers’ views. The What, Who, How serves as a tool to understand prospective teachers’ views, to navigate a broad range of literature on social justice mathematics, and a means of informing the practice of teachers and teacher educators.

Keywords

Mathematics teacher education Social justice Equity Diversity Teacher beliefs 

References

  1. Aguirre, J. M. (2009). Privileging mathematics and equity in teacher education: Framework, counter-resistance strategies, and reflections from a Latina mathematics educator. In B. Greer, S. Mukhopadhyay, A. B. Powell, & S. Nelson-Barber (Eds.), Culturally responsive mathematics education (pp. 295–319). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, G. L., Herr, K., & Nihlen, A. S. (2007). Studying your own school: An educator’s guide to practitioner action research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apple, M. W. (2000). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29(3), 14–22.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barta, J., Sánchez, L., & Barta, J. (2009). Math in the milpa. Teaching Children Mathematics, 16(2), 90–97.Google Scholar
  7. Bartell, T. G. (2012). Is this teaching mathematics for social justice? Teachers’ conceptions of mathematics classrooms for social justice. In A. A. Wager & D. W. Stinson (Eds.), Teaching mathematics for social justice: Conversations with educators (pp. 113–125). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  8. Bartell, T. G. (2013). Learning to teach mathematics for social justice: Negotiating social justice and mathematical goals. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 129–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brantlinger, A. (2005). The geometry of inequality. In E. Gutstein & B. Peterson (Eds.), Rethinking mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers (pp. 97–100). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.Google Scholar
  10. Brantlinger, A. (2013). Between politics and equations: Teaching critical mathematics in a remedial secondary classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1050–1080. doi:10.3102/0002831213487195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1996). Cognitively guided instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Levi, L., Franke, M. L., & Empson, S. B. (2000). Children’s mathematics: A guide for workshop leaders. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  13. Civil, M. (2002). Everyday mathematics, mathematicians’ mathematics, and school mathematics: Can we bring them together? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph, 11, 40–62.Google Scholar
  14. Civil, M. (2007). Building on community knowledge: An avenue to equity in mathematics education. In N. S. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 105–117). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  15. Civil, M., & Andrade, R. (2002). Transitions between home and school mathematics: Rays of hope amidst the passing clouds. In G. de Abreu & N. C. Presmeg (Eds.), Transitions between contexts of mathematical practices (pp. 149–169). Dordrecth: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Civil, M., & Kahn, L. (2001). Mathematics instruction developed from a garden theme. Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(7), 400–405.Google Scholar
  17. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSI_MathStandards.pdf.
  18. D’Ambrosio, U. (2001). What is Ethnomathematics, and how can it help children in school? Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(6), 308–310.Google Scholar
  19. D’Ambrosio, B., Frankenstein, M., Gutiérrez, R., Kastberg, S., Martin, D. B., Moschkovich, J., & Barnes, D. (2013). Addressing racism. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doerr, H. M., & English, L. D. (2003). A modeling perspective on students’ mathematical reasoning about data. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), 110–136. doi:10.2307/30034902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. English, L. D. (2010). Modeling with complex data in the primary school. In R. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies: ICTMA 13 (pp. 287–299). Boston, MA: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0561-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ensign, J. (2005). Helping teachers use students’ home cultures in mathematics lessons: Developmental stages of becoming effective teachers of diverse students. In A. J. Rodriguez & R. S. Kitchen (Eds.), Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy (pp. 225–242). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  23. Esmonde, I. (2011). Snips and snails and puppy dogs’ tails: Genderism and mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 31(2), 27–31.Google Scholar
  24. Felton, M. D. (2010a). Is math politically neutral? Teaching Children Mathematics, 17(2), 60–63.Google Scholar
  25. Felton, M. D. (2010b). The What, How, and Who of mathematics: Challenges in teaching mathematics as a social and political activity. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Dissertations and Theses: Full Text, ProQuest. (Publication No. AAT 3437111).Google Scholar
  26. Felton, M. D. (2012). Test scores in the US: Introducing the data to pre-service teachers. Teaching for Excellence and Equity in Mathematics, 4(1), 7–14.Google Scholar
  27. Felton, M. D. (2014). Why teach mathematics? [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/Publications/Mathematics-Teaching-in-Middle-School/Blog/Why-Teach-Mathematics_/.
  28. Felton, M. D., & Koestler, C. (2012). “Questions and answers can mean something”: Supporting critical reflection in mathematics education. In R. Flessner, G. R. Miller, K. M. Patrizio, & J. R. Horwitz (Eds.), Agency through teacher education: Reflection, community, and learning (pp. 25–35). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  29. Felton, M. D., & Koestler, C. (2015). “Math is all around us and… we can use it to help us”: Teacher agency in mathematics education through critical reflection. The New Educator, 11(4).Google Scholar
  30. Felton, M. D., Simic-Muller, K., & Menéndez, J. M. (2012). “Math isn’t just numbers or algorithms”: Mathematics for social justice in preservice K-8 content courses. In L. J. Jacobsen, J. Mistele, & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education in the public interest: Equity and social justice (pp. 231–252). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. Felton-Koestler, M. D. (forthcoming). Using mathematics to investigate social and political issues: The case of “illegal immigration.” In D. White, S. Crespo, & M. Civil (Eds.), Teacher educators: Facilitating conversations with prospective teachers about inequities in mathematics classrooms. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Flores, A. (2007). Examining disparities in mathematics education: Achievement gap or opportunity gap? The High School Journal, 91(1), 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Frankenstein, M. (1995). Equity in mathematics education: Class in the world outside the class. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. B. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 165–190). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Frankenstein, M. (1997). In addition to the mathematics: Including equity issues in the curriculum. In J. Trentacosta & M. J. Kenny (Eds.), Multicultural and gender equity in the mathematics classroom (pp. 10–22). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  35. Frankenstein, M. (1998). Reading the world with math: Goals for a critical mathematical literacy curriculum. In E. Lee, D. Menkart, & M. Okazawa-Rey (Eds.), Beyond heroes and holidays: A practical guide to K-12 anti-racist, multicultural education and staff development (pp. 306–313). Washington, DC: Network of Educators on the Americas.Google Scholar
  36. Frankenstein, M. (2009). Developing a critical mathematical numeracy through real real-life word problems. In L. Verschaffel, B. Greer, W. Van Dooren, & S. Mukhopadhyay (Eds.), Words and worlds: Modelling verbal descriptions of situations (pp. 111–130). Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  37. Freudenthal, H. (1968). Why to teach mathematics so as to be useful. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1(1–2), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gainsburg, J. (2009). How and why secondary mathematics teachers make (or don’t make) real-world connections in teaching. In L. Verschaffel, B. Greer, W. Van Dooren, & S. Mukhopadhyay (Eds.), Words and worlds: Modelling verbal descriptions of situations (pp. 265–281). New York, NY: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. Gates, P., & Zevenbergen, R. J. (2009). Foregrounding social justice in mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(3), 161–170. doi:10.1007/s10857-009-9105-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. González, N., Andrade, R., Civil, M., & Moll, L. (2001). Bridging funds of distributed knowledge: Creating zones of practices in mathematics. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 6(1&2), 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Greer, B., Mukhopadhyay, S., Powell, A. B., & Nelson-Barber, S. (Eds.). (2009a). Culturally responsive mathematics education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Greer, B., Verschaffel, L., Van Dooren, W., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2009b). Introduction: Making sense of word problems: Past, present, and future. In L. Verschaffel, B. Greer, W. Van Dooren, & S. Mukhopadhyay (Eds.), Words and worlds: Modelling verbal descriptions of situations (pp. xi–xxviii). Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  43. Gregson, S. A. (2013). Negotiating social justice teaching: One full-time teacher’s practice viewed from the trenches. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 1–35.Google Scholar
  44. Gutiérrez, R. (2007a). (Re)defining equity: The importance of a critical perspective. In N. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 37–50). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  45. Gutiérrez, R. (2007b). Context matters: Equity, success, and the future of mathematics education. In T. Lamberg & L. R. Wiest (Eds.), In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the north american chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (29th, Lake Tahoe, Nevada) (pp. 1–18). Reno, NV: University of Nevada, Reno.Google Scholar
  46. Gutiérrez, R. (2008). A “gap-gazing” fetish in mathematics education? Problematizing research on the achievement gap. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 357–364.Google Scholar
  47. Gutstein, E. (2005a). Math, maps, and misrepresentation. In E. Gutstein & B. Peterson (Eds.), Rethinking mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers (pp. 111–116). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.Google Scholar
  48. Gutstein, E. (2005b). South Central Los Angeles: Ratios and density in urban areas. In E. Gutstein & B. Peterson (Eds.), Rethinking mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers (pp. 101–102). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.Google Scholar
  49. Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Harris, M. (1997). An example of traditional women’s work as a mathematics resource. In Powell A. B. & Frankenstein M. (Eds.), Ethnomathematics: Challenging Eurocentrism in mathematics education (pp. 251–222). Albany: SUNY. (Reprinted from For the Learning of Mathematics, 7(3), 26–28, 1987).Google Scholar
  51. Herzig, A. H. (2004). “Slaughtering this beautiful math”: Graduate women choosing and leaving mathematics. Gender and Education, 16(3), 379–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Joseph, G. G. (1997). Foundations of Eurocentrism in mathematics. In Powell A. B.,& Frankenstein M. (Eds.), Ethnomathematics: Challenging Eurocentrism in mathematics education (pp. 61–81). Albany: SUNY. (Revised from Race and Class, 28(3), 13–28, 1987).Google Scholar
  53. Joseph, G. G. (2010). The crest of the peacock: Non-European roots of mathematics (3rd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Katz, V. K., & Lumpkin, B. (1995). The relationship of Egyptian to Greek mathematics. History and Pedagogy of Mathematics Newsletter, 35, 10–13.Google Scholar
  55. Koestler, C. (2010). (Re)envisioning mathematics education: Examining equity and social justice in an elementary mathematics methods course. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Dissertations and Theses: Full Text, ProQuest. (Publication No. AAT 3437187).Google Scholar
  56. Koestler, C. (2012). Beyond apples, puppy dogs, and ice cream: Preparing teachers to teach mathematics for equity and social justice. In A. A. Wager & D. W. Stinson (Eds.), Teaching mathematics for social justice: Conversations with educators (pp. 81–97). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  57. Kozol, J. (2005). The shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid schooling in America. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  58. Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in US schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Leonard, J. (2008). Culturally specific pedagogy in the mathematics classroom: Strategies for teachers and students. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Leonard, J., & Guha, S. (2002). Creating cultural relevance in teaching and learning mathematics. Teaching Children Mathematics, 9(2), 114–118.Google Scholar
  61. Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (Eds.). (2003). Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  62. Lesh, R., & Harel, G. (2003). Problem solving, modeling, and local conceptual development. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(2&3), 157–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lubienski, S. T. (2002). Research, reform, and equity in US mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2–3), 103–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Martin, D. B. (2006). Mathematics learning and participation as racialized forms of experience: African American parents speak on the struggle for mathematics literacy. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(3), 197–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Martin, D. B. (2007). Mathematics learning and participation in the African American context: The co-construction of identity in two intersecting realms of experience. In N. S. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  66. Martin, D. B. (2009). Researching race in mathematics education. Teachers College Record, 111(2), 295–338.Google Scholar
  67. Mcintosh, P. (1990). White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack. Independent School, 49(2), 31–36.Google Scholar
  68. Mistele, J. M., & Spielman, L. J. (2009). The impact of “math for social analysis” on mathematics anxiety in elementary preservice teachers. In Swars, S. L., Stinson, D. W. & Lemons-Smith S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the annual meeting of the north american chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (31st, Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University) (Vol. 5, pp. 483–487).Google Scholar
  69. Moses, R. P., & Cobb, C. E. (2001). Radical equations: Civil rights from Mississippi to the algebra project. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  70. Mukhopadhyay, S., Powell, A. B., & Frankenstein, M. (2009). An ethnomathematical perspective on culturally responsive mathematics education. In B. Greer, S. Mukhopadhyay, A. B. Powell, & S. Nelson-Barber (Eds.), culturally responsive mathematics education (pp. 65–84). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  72. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  73. Palm, T. (2009). Theory of authentic task situations. In L. Verschaffel, B. Greer, W. Van Dooren, & S. Mukhopadhyay (Eds.), Words and worlds: Modelling verbal descriptions of situations (pp. 3–19). Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  74. Perkins, I., & Flores, A. (2002). Mathematical notations and procedures of recent immigrant students. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 7(6), 346–351.Google Scholar
  75. Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 1, pp. 257–315). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  76. Powell, A. B., & Frankenstein, M. (Eds.). (1997). Ethnomathematics: Challenging Eurocentrism in mathematics education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  77. Powell, A. B., & Temple, O. L. (2001). Seeding Ethnomathematics with oware: Sankofa. Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(6), 369–375.Google Scholar
  78. Richert, A. E. (1992). Voice and power in teaching and learning to teach. In L. Valli (Ed.), Reflective teacher education: Cases and critiques (pp. 187–197). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  79. Rodriquez, A. J. (2005). Teachers’ resistance to ideological and pedagogical change: Definitions, theoretical framework, and significance. In A. J. Rodriguez & R. S. Kitchen (Eds.), Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy (pp. 1–16). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  80. Secada, W. G. (1989). Educational equity versus equality of education: An alternative conception. In W. G. Secada (Ed.), Equity in education (pp. 68–88). Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  81. Singapore Ministry of Education. (2003). Primary Mathematics 4A: Textbook (US Edition). Singapore: Times Media Private Ltd.Google Scholar
  82. Skott, J. (2013). Understanding the role of the teacher in emerging classroom practices: Searching for patterns of participation. ZDM, 45(4), 547–559. doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0500-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Skovsmose, O. (1994a). Towards a critical mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(1), 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Skovsmose, O. (1994b). Towards a philosophy of critical mathematics education. Dordrecth, Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Skovsmose, O. (2001). Landscapes of investigation. ZDM, 33(4), 123–132.Google Scholar
  86. Spielman, L. J. (2009). Mathematics education in the public interest: Preservice teachers’ engagement with and reframing of mathematics. In S. L. Swars, D. W. Stinson, & S. Lemons-Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the annual meeting of the north american chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (31st, Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University) (Vol. 5, pp. 408–415).Google Scholar
  87. Stevens, A. C., Sharp, J. M., & Nelson, B. (2001). The intersection of two unlikely worlds: Ratios and drums. Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(6), 376–383.Google Scholar
  88. Stinson, D. W., & Wager, A. A. (2012). A sojourn into the empowering uncertainties of teaching and learning mathematics for social change. In A. A. Wager & D. W. Stinson (Eds.), Teaching mathematics for social justice: Conversations with educators (pp. 3–18). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  89. Stocker, D. (2008). Maththatmatters: A teacher resource linking math and social justice (2nd ed.). Ottawa, ON: Canadian Center for Policy Alternatives.Google Scholar
  90. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  91. Tate, W. F. (1994). Race, retrenchment, and the reform of school mathematics. The Phi Delta Kappan, 75(6), 477–480.Google Scholar
  92. Turner, E. E. (2012). Critical mathematical agency in the overcrowding at Francis Middle School project. In E. Tan, A. C. Barton, E. E. Turner, & M. V. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Empowering science and mathematics education in urban schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  93. Turner, E. E., Drake, C., McDuffie, A. R., Aguirre, J., Bartell, T. G., & Foote, M. Q. (2012a). Promoting equity in mathematics teacher preparation: A framework for advancing teacher learning of children’s multiple mathematics knowledge bases. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(1), 67–82. doi:10.1007/s10857-011-9196-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Turner, E. E., Gutiérrez, R. J., & Varley Gutiérrez, M. (2012b). This project opened my eyes: Preservice elementary teachers learning to connect school, community and mathematics. In L. J. Jacobsen, J. Mistele, & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education in the public interest: Equity and social justice (pp. 183–212). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  95. Turner, E. E., Varley Gutiérrez, M., Simic-Muller, K., & Díez-Palomar, J. (2009). “Everything is math in the whole world”: Integrating critical and community knowledge in authentic mathematical investigations with elementary Latina/o students. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(3), 136–157. doi:10.1080/10986060903013382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (1999). Context problems and assessment: Ideas from the Netherlands. In I. Thompson (Ed.), Issues in teaching numeracy in primary schools (pp. 130–142). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Varley Gutiérrez, M. (2009). “I thought this US place was supposed to be about freedom”: Young Latinas engage in mathematics and social change to save their school. Rethinking Schools, 24(2), 36–39.Google Scholar
  98. Vedantam, S. (2011, March). Psych-out sexism: The innocent, unconscious bias that discourages girls from math and science. Slate. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/the_hidden_brain/2011/03/psychout_sexism.single.html.
  99. Walkerdine, V. (1990). Difference, cognition, and mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 10(3), 51–56.Google Scholar
  100. Zaslavsky, C. (2001). Developing number sense: What can other cultures tell us? Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(6), 312–319.Google Scholar
  101. Zeichner, K. M., & Liston, D. P. (1996). Reflective teaching: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Teacher EducationOhio UniversityAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations