Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 575–594 | Cite as

Sustainable changes in teacher practices: a longitudinal analysis of the classroom practices of high school mathematics teachers

Article

Abstract

This study examines the effects of professional development on various aspects of teachers’ mathematics instruction. Using data collected between 2005 and 2009, we examined the extent to which the instructional practices of 49 US high school teachers who participated in content-based, sustained professional development changed over time. We found that changes in several aspects of their instructional practices followed somewhat different patterns. Teachers made statistically significant and steady changes in mathematical discourse, instructional clarity, and the development of students’ mathematical habit of mind, but not in student interactions or in the use of multiple representations.

Keywords

Professional development In-service teacher education High school teacher Mathematics Instructional practice Longitudinal study 

References

  1. Abell, S. K., & Pizzini, E. L. (1992). The effect of a problem solving in-service program on the classroom behaviors and attitudes of middle school science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(7), 649–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Federation of Teachers. (2002). Principles for professional development: AFT’s guidelines for creating professional development programs that make a difference. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2009). Characteristics of effective teaching of mathematics: A view from the West. Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(2), 147–164.Google Scholar
  4. Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banilower, E. R., Heck, D. J., & Weiss, I. R. (2007). Can professional development make the vision of the standards a reality? The impact of the National Science Foundation’s local systemic change through teacher enhancement initiative. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 375–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell-Gredler, M. E. (1986). Jean Piaget’s cognitive-development theory. Learning and instruction: Theory into practice (pp. 191–233). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Blank, R. K., & de las Alas, N. (2010). Effects of teacher professional development on gains in student achievement: How meta analysis provides scientific evidence useful to education leaders. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School OfficersGoogle Scholar
  9. Borko, H., Mayfield, V., Marion, S., Flexer, R., & Cumbo, K. (1997). Teachers’ developing ideas and practices about mathematics performance assessment: Successes, stumbling blocks, and implications for professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(3), 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boston, M. D., & Smith, M. S. (2009). Transforming secondary mathematics teaching: Increasing the cognitive demands of instructional tasks used in teachers’ classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(2), 119–156.Google Scholar
  11. Boston, M. D., & Smith, M. S. (2011). A ‘task-centric approach’ to professional development: Enhancing and sustaining mathematics teachers’ ability to implement cognitively challenging mathematical tasks. ZDM, 43(6–7), 965–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bullough, R. V., Kauchak, D., Crow, N. A., Hobbs, S., & Stokes, D. (1997). Professional development schools: Cataylsts for teacher and school change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(2), 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Chiang, C., & Loef, M. (1989). Using knowledge of children’s mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 499–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Copur-Gencturk, Y. C. (2012). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching, instructional practices, and student outcomes (Doctoral dissertation), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  15. Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2015). The effects of changes in mathematical knowledge on teaching: A longitudinal study of teachers’ mathematical knowledge and instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(3), 280–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Copur-Gencturk, Y., Hug, B., & Lubienski, S. T. (2014). The effects of a master’s program on teachers’ science instruction: comparing classroom observations, teacher reports, and student surveys. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 51(2), 219–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Desimone, L., Smith, T. M., & Phillips, K. (2013). Linking student achievement growth to professional development participation and changes in instruction: A longitudinal study of elementary students and teachers in title I schools. Teachers College Record, 115(5), 1–46.Google Scholar
  20. Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and education. New York: Touchstone (Original work published 1938).Google Scholar
  21. Farmer, J. D., Gerretson, H., & Lassak, M. (2003). What teachers take from professional development: Cases and implications. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(4), 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fishman, B. J., Marx, R. W., Best, S., & Tal, R. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 643–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 653–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gersten, R., Taylor, M. J., Keys, T. D., Rolfhus, E., & Newman-Gonchar, R. (2014). Summary of research on the effectiveness of math professional development approaches (REL 2014-010). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Educational Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast.Google Scholar
  26. Gibbons, S., Kimmel, H., & O’Shea, M. (1997). Changing teacher behavior through staff development: Implementing the teaching and content standards in science. School Science and Mathematics, 97(6), 302–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 45–51.Google Scholar
  28. Guskey, T. R. (2003). Analyzing lists of the characteristics of effective professional development to promote visionary leadership. NASSP Bulletin, 87(637), 4–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guskey, T. R., & Yoon, K. S. (2009). What works in professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 495–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hedeker, D. (2004). An introduction to growth modeling. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 215–234). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Hedeker, D. R., & Gibbons, R. D. (2006). Longitudinal data analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., & Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers’ knowledge, practice, student outcomes & efficacy. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 13(10), 1–26. Retrieved January 2, 2013, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n10/.
  34. Klein, B. S. (2001). Guidelines for effective elementary science teacher in-service education. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 13(2), 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lambert, L. (1998). Building leadership capacity in schools. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Google Scholar
  36. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lee, O., Hart, J. E., Cuevas, P., & Enders, C. (2004). Professional development in inquiry based science for elementary teachers of diverse student groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1021–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leinwand, S. (2000). Sensible mathematics: A guide for school leaders. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  39. Loucks-Horsley, S., & Matsumoto, C. (1999). Research on professional development for teachers of mathematics and science: The state of the scene. School Science and Mathematics, 99(5), 258–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Hewson, P. W., & Love, N. (Eds.). (2010). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  41. McMeeking, L. B. S., Orsi, R., & Cobb, R. B. (2012). Effects of a teacher professional development program on the mathematics achievement of middle school students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(2), 159–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Merrill, C., Devine, K. L., Brown, J. W., & Brown, R. A. (2010). Improving geometric and trigonometric knowledge and skill for high school mathematics teachers: A professional development partnership. Journal of Technology Studies, 36(2), 20–30.Google Scholar
  43. Miller, B., Moon, J., & Elko, S. (2000). Teacher leadership in mathematics and science: Casebook and facilitator’s guide. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  44. Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Bolyard, J. J., Oh, H., & Cerar, N. I. (2011). Common features of professional development activities for mathematics and science teachers. Professional Development in Education, 37(4), 571–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. National Academy of Education. (2009). Teacher quality. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  46. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  47. NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  48. NCTM. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  49. Parise, L. M., & Spillane, J. P. (2010). Teacher learning and instructional change: How formal and on-the-job learning opportunities predict change in elementary school teachers’ practice. The Elementary School Journal, 110(3), 323–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Polly, D., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Examining how learner-centered professional development influences teachers’ espoused and enacted practices. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(2), 120–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sandholtz, J. H. (2002). Inservice training or professional development: Contrasting opportunities in a school/university partnership. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(7), 815–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sandholtz, J. H., & Ringstaff, C. (2013). Assessing the impact of teacher professional development on science instruction in the early elementary grades in rural US schools. Professional Development in Education, 39(5), 678–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. SAS Institute, Inc. (2008). SAS/STAT1 9.2 user’s guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  55. Scher, L., & O’Reilly, F. (2009). Professional development for K-12 math and science teachers: What do we really know? Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(3), 209–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schoen, H. (Ed.). (2003). Teaching mathematics through problem solving, grades 6–12. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  57. Senk, S. L., & Thompson, D. R. (Eds.). (2003). Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn?. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  58. Skemp, R. R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  59. Smith, A. A. (2013). Report of the 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education: Status of middle school mathematics. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.Google Scholar
  60. Supovitz, J. A., Mayer, D. P., & Kahle, J. B. (2000). Promoting inquiry-based instructional practice: The longitudinal impact of professional development in the context of systemic reform. Educational Policy, 14(3), 331–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 963–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  63. Van Hiele, P. M., & Van Hiele-Geldof, D. (1958). A method of initiation into geometry at secondary school. In H. Freudenthal (Ed.), Report on methods of initiation into geometry (pp. 67–80). Groningen: J. B. Wolters.Google Scholar
  64. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). In E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar (Eds.), Thought and language (E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  65. Weiss, I. R., Pasley, J. D., Smith, P. S., Banilower, E. R., & Heck, D. J. (2003). Highlights report, looking inside the classroom: A study of K-12 mathematics and science education in the United States. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.Google Scholar
  66. Whittington, D. (2002). Report of the 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education: Status of high school mathematics teaching. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.Google Scholar
  67. Woodward, J., Beckmann, S., Driscoll, M., Franke, M., Herzig, P., Jitendra, A., et al. (2012). Improving mathematical problem solving in grades 4 through 8 education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications_reviews.aspx#pubsearch/.
  68. Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Curriculum and InstructionUniversity of HoustonHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Rice University School Mathematics ProjectRice UniversityHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations