# Decentering: A construct to analyze and explain teacher actions as they relate to student thinking

## Abstract

Mathematics educators and writers of mathematics education policy documents continue to emphasize the importance of teachers focusing on and using student thinking to inform their instructional decisions and interactions with students. In this paper, we characterize the interactions between a teacher and student(s) that exhibit this focus. Specifically, we extend previous work in this area by utilizing Piaget’s construct of decentering (The language and thought of the child. Meridian Books, Cleveland, 1955) to explain teachers’ actions relative to both their thinking and their students’ thinking. In characterizing decentering with respect to a teacher’s focus on student thinking, we use two illustrations that highlight the importance of decentering in making in-the-moment decisions that are based on student thinking. We also discuss the influence of teacher decentering actions on the quality of student–teacher interactions and their influence on student learning. We close by discussing various implications of decentering, including how decentering is related to other research constructs including teachers’ development and enactment of mathematical knowledge for teaching.

## Keywords

Decentering Student thinking Secondary mathematics teachers Mathematical knowledge for teaching Pedagogical actions## References

- Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics.
*Elementary School Journal,**94*(4), 373–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bauersfeld, H. (1995). The structuring of the structures: Development and function of mathematizing as a social practice. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.),
*Constructivism in education*(pp. 137–158). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar - Boaler, J., & Brodie, K. (2004). The importance, nature and impact of teacher questions. In D. E. McDougall & J. A. Ross (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 26th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(pp. 773–781). Toronto, Ontario: Institute of Studies in Education/University of Toronto.Google Scholar - Brodie, K. (2004). Working with learner contributions: Coding teacher responses. In D. E. McDougall & J. A. Ross (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 26th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(pp. 690–698). Toronto, Ontario: Institute of Studies in Education/University of Toronto.Google Scholar - Brodie, K. (2011). Working with learners’ mathematical thinking: Towards a language of description for changing pedagogy.
*Teaching and Teacher Education,**27*, 174–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Carlson, M. (1995).
*A cross-sectional investigation of the development of the function concept*. Unpublished doctoral Dissertation, Department of Mathematics, University of Kansas, USA.Google Scholar - Carlson, M. (1998). A cross-sectional investigation of the development of the function concept. In A. H. Schoenfeld, J. J. Kaput & E. Dubinsky (Eds.),
*Research in collegiate mathematics education III*(Vol. 7, pp. 114–162). Rhode Island: Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences.Google Scholar - Carlson, M., & Bloom, I. (2005). The cyclic nature of problem solving: An emergent multidimensional problem-solving framework.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58*(1), 45–75.Google Scholar - Carlson, M., Bowling, S., Moore, K. C., & Ortiz, A. (2007). The role of the facilitator in promoting meaningful discourse among professional learning communities of secondary mathematics and science teachers. In T. Lamberg & L. R. Wiest (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meetings of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(pp. 841–848). Reno, University of Nevada: PME–NA.Google Scholar - Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33*(5), 352–378.Google Scholar - Carlson, M. P., Moore, K. C., Teuscher, D., Slemmer, G., Underwood, K., & Tallman, M. (2012). Affecting and documenting shifts in secondary precalculus teachers’ instructional effectiveness and students’ learning. In
*Paper Presented at the 2012 Math and Science (MSP) Learning Network Conference (LNC)*. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar - Carlson, M., & Oehrtman, M. (2010). Precalculus: Pathways to calculus: A problem solving approach. Rational Reasoning.Google Scholar
- Carlson, M. P., Oehrtman, M., & Moore, K. (2013). Precalculus: Pathways to calculus: A problem solving approach (4th ed.). Rational Reasoning.Google Scholar
- Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Franke, M., Levi, L., & Empson, S. B. (2000).
*Cognitively guided instruction: A research-based teacher professional development program for mathematics*(Vol. 03). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.Google Scholar - Chapman, M. (1988).
*Constructive evolution: Origins and development of Piaget’s thought*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar - Clarke, B. (2008). A framework of growth points as a powerful teacher development tool. In D. Tirosh & T. Wood (Eds.),
*International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Tools and processes in mathematics teacher education*(Vol. 2, pp. 235–256). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar - Clark, P. G., Moore, K. C., & Carlson, M. P. (2008). Documenting the emergence of “speaking with meaning” as a sociomathematical norm in professional learning community discourse.
*The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27*(4), 297–310.Google Scholar - Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1992). A constructivist alternative to the representational views of mind in mathematics education.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,**23*(1), 2–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Franke, M. L., Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Ansell, E., & Behrend, J. (1998). Understanding teachers’ self-sustaining change in the context of professional development.
*Teaching and Teacher Education,**14*(1), 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Franke, M. L., & Kazemi, E. (2001). Learning to teach mathematics: Focus on student thinking.
*Theory into Practice,**40*(2), 102–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Franke, M. L., Turrou, A. C., & Webb, N. (2011). Teacher follow-up: Communicating high expectations to wrestle with the mathematics. In L. R. Wiest & T. Lamberg (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Groups for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*. Reno, NV: PME-NA.Google Scholar - Franke, M. L., Webb, N. M., Chan, A. G., Ing, M., Freund, D., & Battey, D. (2009). Teacher Questioning to elicit students’ mathematical thinking in elementary school classrooms.
*Journal of Teacher Education,**60*, 380–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Goos, M. (2004). Learning mathematics a classroom community of inquiry.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,**35*, 258–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.),
*Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning*(pp. 65–97). New York: Simon & Shuster Macmillan.Google Scholar - Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester Jr (Ed.),
*Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning*(Vol. 1, pp. 371–404). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,**41*(2), 169–202.Google Scholar - Johnson, E. M. S., & Larsen, S. P. (2012). Teacher listening: The role of knowledge of content and students.
*The Journal of Mathematical Behavior,**31*(1), 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kazemi, E., & Stipek, D. (2001). Promoting conceptual thinking in four upper-elementary mathematics classrooms.
*The Elementary School Journal,**102*(1), 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lamon, S. J. (2005).
*Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers*(2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar - Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching.
*American Educational Research Journal,**27*(1), 29–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Learning Mathematics for Teaching Project. (2011). Measuring the mathematical quality of instruction.
*Journal for Mathematics Teacher Education,**14*(1), 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Levin, D. M., Hammer, D., & Coffey, J. E. (2009). Novice teachers’ attention to student thinking.
*Journal of Teacher Education,**60*(2), 142–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mason, J. (2002).
*Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing*. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar - Mason, J., & Spence, M. (1999). Beyond mere knowledge of mathematics: The importance of knowing-to act in the moment.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics,**38*, 135–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mehan, H. (1979).
*Learning lesson: Social organization in the classroom*. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mercer, N. (2000).
*Words and minds*. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Moore, K. C. (2013). Making sense by measuring arcs: A teaching experiment in angle measure.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83*(2), 225–245. doi: 10.1007/s10649-012-9450-6. - Moore, K. C., & Carlson, M. P. (2012). Students’ images of problem contexts when solving applied problems.
*The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31*(1), 48–59.Google Scholar - Nathan, M. J., & Knuth, E. J. (2003). A study of whole classroom mathematical discourse and teacher change.
*Cognition and Instruction,**21*(2), 175–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989).
*Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics*. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991).
*Professional standards for teaching mathematics*. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000).
*Principles and standards for school mathematics*. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - National Governors Associations Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers (NGA Center and CCSSO). (2010). Common core standards for mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/.
- O’Connor, M. C. (1998). Language socialisation in the mathematics classroom: Discourse practices and mathematical thinking. In M. Blunk (Ed.),
*Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning*(pp. 17–55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Piaget, J. (1955).
*The language and thought of the child*. Cleveland: Meridian Books.Google Scholar - Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1967).
*The child’s conception of space*. New York: Norton.Google Scholar - Rittenhouse, P. S. (1998). The teacher’s role in mathematical conversation: Stepping in and stepping out. In M. Lampert & M. L. Blunk (Eds.),
*Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning*(pp. 163–189). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Silverman, J., & Thompson, P. W. (2008). Toward a framework for the development of mathematical knowledge for teaching.
*Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,**11*, 499–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M. (1975).
*Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils*. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar - Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (2011).
*5 Practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions*. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar - Steffe, L. P., & Olive, J. (2010).
*Children’s fractional knowledge*. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Interaction or intersubjectivity? A reply to Lerman.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,**31*(2), 191–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Steffe, L. P., von Glasersfeld, E., Richards, J., & Cobb, P. (1983).
*Children’s counting types: Philosophy, theory, and application*. New York, NY: Praeger Scientific.Google Scholar - Thompson, P. W. (2000). Radical constructivism: Reflections and directions. In L. P. Steffe & P. W. Thompson (Eds.),
*Radical constructivism in action: Building on the pioneering work of Ernst von Glaserfeld*(pp. 412–448). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar - Thompson, P. W. (2008). Conceptual analysis of mathematical ideas: Some spadework at the foundations of mathematics education. In O. Figueras, J. L. Cortina, S. Cortina, T. Alatorre, T. Rojano & A. Sepulveda (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(pp. 45–64). Morelia, Mexico: PME.Google Scholar - Thompson, P. W., & Saldanha, L. A. (2003). Fractions and multiplicative reasoning. In J. Kilpatrick, G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.),
*Research companion to the principles and standards for school mathematics*(pp. 95–113). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - Truxaw, M. P., & DeFranco, T. (2007). Lessons from Mr. Larson: An inductive model of teaching for orchestrating discourse.
*Mathematics Teacher,**101*(4), 268–272.Google Scholar - von Glasersfeld, E. (1995).
*Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning*. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Walshaw, M., & Anthony, G. (2008). The teachers’ role in classroom discourse: A review of recent research into mathematics classrooms.
*Review of Educational Research,**78*(3), 516–550. doi: 10.3102/0034654308320292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Wertsch, J. V., & Toma, C. (1995). Discourse and learning in the classroom: A sociocultural approach. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.),
*Constructivism in education*. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Wood, T. (1998). Alternative patterns of communication in mathematics classes: Funneling or focusing. In H. Steinbring, M. G. B. Bussi, & A. Sierpinska (Eds.),
*Language and communication in the mathematics classroom*(pp. 167–178). Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar - Woodward, J., & Irwin, K. C. (2005). Language appropriate for the New Zealand numeracy project. In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough, R. Pierce, et al. (Eds.), Building connections: Theory, research and practice.
*Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia*(pp. 799–806). Sydney: MERGA.Google Scholar